Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law > SLS cases > Flashcards

SLS cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MPRE flashcards MBE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

R v Chambers

A

pleaded on base of a superceeded law
‘profoundly unaceptable if law is not practically accessible even to courts and litigants’
this is due to lack of codified law and little statutory consolidation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Companies Act 2006

A

example of consolidation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interpretation section

A

specify the meanings of words and prases within an act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sunset clause

A

AOP are in force until repealed or ammended unless have termination date- s.27 Terrosim act 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Thobrn v Sunderland City Council

A

re meausrements of fruit. this case set precedent that implied repeal only applies to non-constitutional statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Destitude

A

act not been enforced for long time- peopel acting in contrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

direct ammedment

A

substitutes new provision for old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

indirect ammendment

A

leave original text- describe how should be changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Commencement order

A

statutory instrument giving the govt power to decide on commencement of an act after has been given royal assent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘Consolidiation; A plea’- Samuals, 2005

A

The consolidation process has slacked recently with only 1/3 of UK bills having been consilidated. SLC had before devolution produced 20 consolidation accts.
Uk example- Income and corporation taxes acct 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The legislative and Regulatory reform act 2006

A

Allows govt ammend exisisting legislation in order to remove vaguely expressed ‘burdens’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Article 1 s.9 US constitution

A

blanket provision on retrospectivity- ‘no ex post facto’ law shall be passed’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ECHR art 7

A

no criminal legislation to be treated retrospectivly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Local government (s) act 1973

A

this gives the local govt authority to make bylaws- byelaws need approval by confirrming authority- stated pre-devolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mulloch case

A

Turned on scottish education act- held the act was ultra vires as outwith the enabling act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Enabling act

A

sets out purpose, limits, terms of delegation

SI must meet Statory Instruments act 1946

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

negative resolution procedure

A

common and applied to routine legislation- means SI approvved unless action to anull it within 40 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

affirmitive resolution procedure

A

SI not in force unless affirmed by parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

henry 8th clause

A

constituional reform and governeance act 2010- give ministers power to envoke provision of primary leg- give borad power to unelected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

enacting formula

A

at start of UK statutes- say what you aare now reading is law and declares source of authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Roe v Russel

A

LJ Scrutton state the obscurity of statutes and drafter mean legislation often hard to understand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Schedules

A

appendices at end of AOP containing detailed matter to complicated for body of text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Evolvira the cow

A

bizarre case- never actually worked out what happened tot he cow- that evidence never given. this case proves that the evidence has to be relevent - ask would it change outcome? must also be proven under standerd of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

‘The vast majority of statutes never come before the courts for interpretation’

A

Cross, statutory interpretation, 1995- staatutory interpreation is rare.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Symantic ambiguity

A

word has 2 or more meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

synantic ambiguity

A

meaning can be derived from sentance structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Williams v Evans

A

ambiguity of ‘fixed plant or machinery’- outcome for this case based on the NATURAL MEANING OF WORDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Obson case

A

the statement in legislation was unccertain so took interpretation that MOST FAVOURED DEFENCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Pepper v Hart

A

Did teacher have to pay tax on reduced school fees- NO based on purposive approach
Try to get parliaments intention- go for natural meaning of words.
‘It is for the courts to construe these words and it is the courts duty indoing so to give effect to the intention of parliament using these words.’
In interpreting legislation… give effect so far as language permits to intention of legislature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Zang case

A

‘the court must deduce the intention of parliament- may deport form the natural meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Holliday

A

‘car without gearbox on rollerskates’- is it on the road?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

J.lyons

A

cream filled swiss rolls- used artificial cream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Cross on interpretation

A

where appropriate use ordinary and gramattical meaning- apply secondry meaning if neccessary.
May read words if implied
can resort to presumptions
refrain from contradictiing existting law or eu law/conventions
Must be read in line of convention rights- scotland act section 29- scotland act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Munsell and olins

A

Was a farm shed ‘premisis ‘for a rent act? example of PURPOSIVE approach being used in the CJEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

R v Judge of London city court

A

‘if the words of an act are clear you must follow them’

suppports the literal rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Grey v Pearson

A

Regards to a will.
‘the grammattical and ordinary sense of the words is to be adhered to, unless that would lead to an absurdity’
supportive of golden rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Lord blackburn on golden rule

A

literal meaning to be take unless it produces ‘an inconsistenty or absurdity’- in the grey v pearson case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Heydons case (english)

A

very old example of the mischeif rule coming into play. look at the act in order to ‘suppress the mischief and advance the remedy’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

leadbutter case

A

supportive of mischeif rule- regards to a moterbike used for slamon poaching- look at aim of the act- mischief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Smith v Hughes

A

The prostitutes were found to be liable as were visable- this was the mischeif designed to be overcome. in this sense the miscief rule is better than the literal rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Fisher v bell

A

is it an offence if the flick knife is in the window- yes- mischeif rule again.
apply wisceif rule if is ambiguit in statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Pickstone v Freemens

A

House of lords case. woman said her work was equl to males whose work was equal to higher paid males.

The House of Lords decided that the literal approach would have left the United Kingdom in breach of its Treaty obligations to give effect to an EU directive. It therefore used the purposive approach and stated that Miss Pickstone was entitled to claim on the basis of work of equal value even though there was a male employee doing the same work as her.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Lord Clyde Fitzpatrick

A

‘presumption is that updating general constuction is to be applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

IRC v Hindley

A

All acts should be read as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Nosciatr a sociis

A

governing of a linguistic priciple that the menaing of a term is to be governed by the common features it share with other terms in a list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

expressio unius, exclusio alterius

A

‘if you don;t say it you don’t mean it’- presumtion sometimes applied i.e. in R v Attorney general

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

presumptions (4)

A

against unclear alteration of settled law
against absurd results
against criminalising behaviour
against retrospectivity and against injustice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Sweet v Parsley

A

was there an offence under the 1965 Drugs Act- if others unaware . landlord completly unaware of residents smoking in his premesis.
Lord reid ‘there has been a presumption for many years that parliament does not intend to make criminals of persons in no way blameworthy’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Anderson

A

preambles can be used in inact terpretatioin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Interpretation 1978

A

governs interpretation of standard definitions i.e. brittish summer time and gendered words. In scotland- interpretation and legislative reform scotland act 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Salvensen and Cameron v Cotton

A

when legislation chalanged, usually found to be compatible- not in these cases.
statutes found to be incompatible with human rights conventions andd thus outwith competetencceed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

R v Peters

A

Dictionaries are not to be taken as authoritive exponents of the meanings of words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Ejusdem generis

A

of some kind close nature

look at general description following specific descriptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

mental health act

A

are neices and nephews family?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

In pari materia

A

when sttute ambiguois meaning determiined by loooking at it in the light of other statutes on the same subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Duncan v Jackson

A

Represenation of the people act- did ‘any house, ware house, counting shed, shop or other building’ cover a structure designed to hold a gas meter? no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Monarrch airlines case

A

use of paliamentary debates is not allowed unless using the test set down in pepper v hart
they also supported the use of traveaux preparatoires as an aide to satatutory interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

pepper v hart on debates

A

test- cannot use hansard unless
the act leads to absurdity
act is ambiguois or obscure
the material relied on consists of staements from ministers and the satements relied on are clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Lord Denning (on hansard) in Davis

A

to ignore hansard would be ‘to grope around in the dark for the meaning of an act without actually switching on the light’ - HOL abolished this argument saying- paliamentary debates were’ not conclusive to a clear and unbiased explanation of statutory language’

60
Q

L. styne in pepper v hart

A

‘much for of the work of the courts is now concerned with interpreation of documents i.e. statutes rather than examination of precedents’
‘the relevent exchanges sometimes take place late at night… these are not ideal conditions for the making of authoritive statements on the meaning of a clause in a bill’

61
Q

L Styne in article ‘Pepper v Hart; A re-examination (2001)

A

it goes against art 9 bill of rights that are taking into question parlaimentary debates.
this is the governements view of what parliament want- shifting power from legislative branch to exectutive branch.

62
Q

s. Vogeneour- A retreat from pepper v Hart?’

A

‘the scope of pepper v hart has been reduced to such an extent that the ruling has become almost meaningless’

63
Q

Macwilliams

A

using law commission reports to aide interpretation

64
Q

R v National asylum

A

using explanatory notes to aide interpretation

65
Q

Human rights act- when

A

1998

66
Q

President Hope in T petitioner

A

followed the general principles of eu law of which human rights is one of

67
Q

Ghadian

A

HOL initially said living together as husband and wife didnt cover same sex- after 1998 act deision overturned

68
Q

‘Interpreation of statutes’- j. flemming wallace

A

consolidation acts are- ‘acts which bring together in one act the statutory provision relating to a particular topic without any changes in law and not subject to any ammendments.

69
Q

5 rules on statutory interpreation according to cross

A

must give effect to grammatical, ordinary meaning of words given context
if result obserd/ cotrary to purpose of statute- apply second meaning
if necessary judge can read in missing words implied by present words and ignore certain words leadin to absurditiys
can resort to materials and presumptions
must interpret statute to give full effect of eu and convention laws if directly applicable

70
Q

EU interpreation

A 
is purposive (teleological approach) 
treaties written in erms of general principle and are not exhausitve i.e. ARTICLE 45(1) is vague as doesn't properly define 'workers' 
sees itself as comunicative (community minded)
71
Q

Case 9/70 (opinion on the literal approach)

A

‘a literal interpreation of article 4 would not correspond to the aims of the directive in question’
‘every provision of law should be placed inits context and interpreted in the light of community law as a whole

72
Q

Lord Templemen on CJEU

A

‘the uk is under an obligation to follow the practice of the CJEU by giving purposive construction to D and R’s’

73
Q

Mcbryde on common law (painting)

A

‘common law is a canvas on which a picture is being painted’ mcbryde on contract

74
Q

powers of declartor and nobile officium

A

‘equitable power’ issued to court of session and HCJ to provide remedy where none exists - stair in hi sinstitutions mentions 7 examples.
LP emeslie’it may be excersised in highly special or unforseen circumsatnces’

75
Q

nobile officium

A

used in crminal cases in ‘unforseen circumstances to which law provides no provision’ Alison
used to avoid injustice/ opression

76
Q

declaratory power

A

declare behaviou sees as morally wrong to be a criinal offence
Kaliq- glue sniffing kits

77
Q

ratio decedendi

A

the rule or principle of law for which a competent outsider considers the law to be priciple
no ratio stands alone and it is not verbally fixed
identify relevent facts and conditions that judges have stated or impled to relevent exclude those that are irrelevent
elaborted in england and us but not so much in scotland
to be binding ratio needs to be in point or on all fours and in relative position in court heirrchy

78
Q

Donoughue v stevenson

A

re drinks in cans
determine the right level of generality . lord atkin- general approach. Lord macmillan- narrow.
does the ratio extend to drinks manufacturers only?
decision in this set a precedent which was followed in Australian Knitting mills and Shaw v DPP

79
Q

obiter dicta

A

things said by the way often obsevations or hypothetical examples may still be pursuasive
R v Howe and Bannister-House of Lords held that the defence of duress was not available to murder. This was the ratio decidendi of the case. The House of Lords went on to consider whether the defnce should be available to those who attempt murder and stated obiter dicta that the defence of duress should not be available to attempted murder.

80
Q

stare decesis

A

ratio of precedents will determine ow a case is decided by later courts

81
Q

when is precedent not binding

A

subsequent legislation- if precedent been taken over by legislatiom- cannot be reppealed
Per Incurium- if court have not considered all relevent law and have made erranous decision as per incurium and this means is not binding - MITCHELL V MACKAY
Age and defective reporting- may render precedent unbinding- Shands Trs/ defect- morgan guarantee
Societal changes- may not be binding if cessante ratione legis… applies- ‘where reason for law ceases to exist then so does the law itself’ allows court respond to changes- Beiths Trs

82
Q

Over-rule precedent

A

when court higher in heirarchy departs from a decision made ina lower court. the previous decision is no longer binding but not retrospctive- Rv R
can also occur in courts of same level

83
Q

Reversing a precedent

A

this is when a higher court departs froma decision of the lower court on appeal- i.e. the gillick case

84
Q

Distinguishing a precedent

A

this is where the facts of a case are deemed sufficently different so the previous case is no longer binding-
Balfour v Balfour

85
Q

aargments pro precedent

A 
certainty and predictibility 
guidance for judges and practitioners 
consistentcy 
timesaving 
justice- alike should be treated alike
86
Q

anti precedent

A

ridgidity
infexibility
expense- overturning means going to a higher court
injustice- not free to decide case based on law but instead follow precedent
unconstitutional- role of courts is not to make law

87
Q

Erskine, Institutions

on precedent

A

Precedents- decisions, though they bind the parties litigating create no obligation for judges to follow the same track if contrary to the law’ this was written when there were no law reports to be consulted just partick of judges in scotland

88
Q

Alfons Luttick case

A

CJEU not a huge fan of precendent and can depart from previos decisions

89
Q

Murphey v Brentwood

A

English HOL case over-ruled previous scots law case

90
Q

courts reform s act 20014

A

change court stucture
new sheriff appeal court
summary sheriffs hear low value civil cases
introduce specialist sheriffs
sheriff principle decisions to be binding on lower sheriffs
can hear cases of up to £100,000

91
Q

Elliot

A

courts can depart from earlier precednt if the courts feel their attention was not drawn to relvent authority

92
Q

Mostyth

A

ratio must be consistent with actual outcome of the case

93
Q

protasis

A

if part of decision-

94
Q

apodecisis

A

then

95
Q

Twing v Miers

Bund treasure rule

A

every case has pre-detremined ratio
ratio cannot be found in reading case
ratio cannot change over time

96
Q

corpus juris civilis

A

insitutes
novels
digest
code

97
Q 
P
P
R
A 
'private law;
A

Persons
Patrimony
Rights
Acts (judical)

98
Q

procedral law

A

rules by which court hears and determines proceeding delas with evidence, pleadings and practice and how legal rights enforced

99
Q

Substantive law

A

is statutory or written law that defines rights and duties such as cirmes and punishments in criminal law and civil rights and responsibilities- is codiefied in legislative stautes or can be enacted thorugh initive process.
P and S law work together to ensure that in criminal an civil cases the appropriate laws are applied an proper procedures followed in order to bring a case to trial

100
Q

Patrimony

A

the totatility of a persons assets and liailities. it is the container not the contents
2 parts- assets and liability

101
Q

judical act

A

act tht changes atte of legal universe i.e. making contract

102
Q

victim uris

A

‘the chain’ the idea that rights and obligations are the same things

103
Q

Current codification project- Eric clive

A

the benefits of codification would greatly improve the style and elegance of staute law in that area
should it be heavy- BGB or light- france
lack of flexibility avoided by specially designed provisions- draft criminal code has provision enabling 3 or mmore judges in HCJ to recognise and decalare a new defence
advantage of phasing- provisde consistent terminology- acts priorities accoring to imprtance- tricky left till later
Would codification change legal culture? tke famly law act- alot of it is alreday statutory, maybe contract- this area prides iteslf in having clear defined rules for parties- yet codification and turnign cases into statutory provision would be dificult but would provide solid statutory provisions- maybe law of UE would mean getting rid of conditiones?
a well drafted code shouldnt have gaps
the nature of law has changed i.e Afults with incapacity act 1995- mixture public and private- civil code need not be just cnfined to private matters although still predominantly.
CSA couldnt be coded due to lack of competency of the scottish governement
some could be left to schedules/subordinate leg
have been talks of creating a SOG code for major sales
draft criminal code and substantive civl code already been drafted- draft stimulates thought on law and how best to organise and set out scots law- cannot rule sout possibilitys.

104
Q

1st division

A

lord president

105
Q

second divions

A

lord justice clerk

106
Q

HCJ

A

lord justice general

107
Q

solem proedure

A

has jury

108
Q

summary procedure

A

no jury

109
Q

de

A

decree for pursuer- undefended- decree of absense
decree for pursuer- defended- decree in foro
decree for defender- dismissal- cnat be raised again
decree for defender- decree of absolviter- can’t raise action on same thing
decree for defender- Res judicata- cannot be litigated ever again

110
Q

eurpoeal coal and steel community act

A

1951

111
Q

treaty of rome

A

1958
signed by 6 statesprovides for 4 freedoms- extended under internal market rules of SEA and strengthened in protocol 27 of lisbon treaty
created institutional governement structue
provides basis for devevelopment of specific common policies i.e. fishing and agriculture
since lisbon in 2009 has been repackaged and is now TFEUobligations
establishes eu governence and once signedmembers are bounds to

112
Q

Maastrict treaty

A

signed in 1992 formally known the TEU

113
Q

Art 261

A

4 freedoms

114
Q

Exclusive competencec Art 3 TFEU

A

customs union
establishing of competeition rules for internal market
monetry policy
common fisheries policy- conservation of marine biological resources
common commercial policy

115
Q

Shared competence Art 4 tfeu

A 
internal market
social policy 
agriculture and fisheries
environment 
transport 
public health matters
116
Q

Supporting competence/supplement actions of member states Art 6

A

protection and improvement of human health
industry
tourism

117
Q

competency to provide arrangements within EU member states ust co-ordinate plicies Art 5

A

economic policiys
social policies
employment

118
Q

article 13 TEU

A

sets out i

institutions

119
Q

teu

A

sets out all principles/basic constitutional principles
aims and obejectives of EU
legislative competence
enhance co-operation- france applied article 47 other states to show their support and sovreignity

120
Q

art 1 (3) TEU

A

that teu and tfeu shall have same legal value

121
Q

tfeu

A

provisions on how objectives to be achieved
provision for 4 freedoms and eu citezenship - art 20
outlines legislative competence and powers of insitutions

122
Q

article 2 teu

A

eu founded on values of respect for human dignity, free dome and democracy

123
Q

art 3 teu

A 
aim to promote peace and wellbeing 
2- offer free movement of persons 
3- establishes an internal market
4- establish monetry unnion
5- contribute to peace security and sustainability of earth 
6- principle of conferral (limitation)
124
Q

principle of cnferral

A 
art 4(1) on exclusive competence- competencies not transferred remain with member states
art 5(1) limits of a unions competences are governed by principle of conferral 
5(2) competencies nto transferred reamian with emmebr states
125
Q

art 157(3) tfeu

A

have to adopt measures to promote equal treatment of men and woman and equal pay- example of facct you have to find treaty article

126
Q

Article 5 (1) teu

A

use of union competences governed by principles of s and p

127
Q

art 4(2) teu

A 
respect equality of MS and national identities respect 
essential state function
ensure territorial integrity 
maintain law and order 
safegueard national security
128
Q

subsidiarity

A

doctrine managing legislaiv intervention under art 5(3)
areas which do not fal under exclusive competence act only if action cannot be sufficiently achieved by MS at central, regional or local level and better achieved at union level

129
Q

proportionality

A

art 5(4) union shall not exceed what is neccessary to achieve objectives of treaties

130
Q

art 288

A

defines the types of eu legilation

131
Q

art 50 tfeu

A

promotes the use of directives

132
Q

art 289

A

ordinary legislative procedure - joint adoption by ep and council of r,d ,d on proposal from commission- co decision

133
Q

protocol 2 on s and p lisbon

A

promotes national govts role as a watchdog

134
Q

art 48 TFEU

A

forsees the procedure for ammedment- either ordinary or simplified

135
Q

artt 18 tfeu

A

no discrimination

136
Q

art 19 teu

A

cjeu includes cj, general court and specialised court (cvivil service tribunal since 2005

137
Q

art 256

A

general court

138
Q

art 252

A

court of justice

139
Q

art 258

A

enforcement action

140
Q

art 267

A

preliminary references

141
Q

art 291

A

what to use? d,r, d ect

142
Q

article 17 teu

A

comission are the guardian of the treaties

143
Q

art 263

A

reviewable act
need to be legally binding and been adopted by institution
sets out applicants
2- privilaged within 2 months
3- semi- ct to rotect perogitives
4- non- adressed to them or of direct individual concern

144
Q

grounds for review

A

lack of copetence
infingement of essentiL procedural requirement
infringement of treatty or anay rule on application
misuse of powers

145
Q

les verts

A

relied on art 173 of eec treaty- that neither the intitutions nor the MS could avoid a review of the question weather the measures adopted by them are in conformity of the treaties

146
Q

pluamann

A

if an act affects them by reason of certain attributes peculiar to them or by circumstances differentiated from all other persons. must belong to closed class of potential applicants- fixed memebrship when act comes into force

Law (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions