Situation Ethics - AO2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the strength and weakness of Situation Ethics being teleological?

A
  • The ‘‘rightness’ of an action is determined by outcome - Strength
    How can one know an outcome, one can guess but never truly know, do we have enough time, info and capacity to determine the outcome - weakness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Fletcher believe about actions and their “rightness” or “wrongness”

A

Actions are never intrinsically right or wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Anthony O’hears objection?

A
  • Some actions are surely intrinsically wrong
  • He asks if it could ever be right to throw living babies onto a bonfire
  • Some actions may be right in a situation but it does not mean all actions in a situation will be right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What would Fletcher argue love does?

A
  • He would argue love does what is ‘good; for someone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Fletcher fail to define?

A
  • Fletcher never defines what ‘good’ truly is

- He only ever speaks of love and justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Would Fletcher Argue that SE is a religious ethic?

A
  • Fletcher would argue that SE is a religious ethic and follows the example of Jesus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What would Evangelicals say about SE?

A
  • Evangelicals would say the bible has clear rules to be followed
  • No exceptions to the 10 commandments
  • Following Situation Ethics is ‘Cherry Picking’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What would Fletcher argue gives us confidence in our moral decision making?

A

Fletcher would argue acting out of love gives one confidence in their moral decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is DZ Phillips view? (Quote)

A
  • Questions whether we can truly be confident in our moral decisions, do actions resolve moral dilemmas involving evil or do we just do the only action available to us
  • “even after a person has decided what he must do in these situations, he may still feel remorse for having committed the evil”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What would William Temple suggest? Give the counter-argument too.

A
  • Temple suggests doing the most loving thing equals doing a ‘good’ thing
  • Can motivation influence good or bad, e.g giving to the poor to show off
  • Adding to Philips, killing self-defence may be right but does not make it good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Whats the situational argument for SE?

A
  • Decisions are made for each situation one finds themselves in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the counter-argument to the situational argument?

A
  • What is a “situation”, is it defined by time or a particular set of actions?
  • Would terminating a pregnancy be immoral at one stage but upon learning it was Hitler would it become moral? - How much time does this situation include?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a strength of SE’s approach to the moral life?

A
  • SE means legalistic rules do not have to be followed

- We can do whatever the situation requires to achieve love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What would WD Ross say about SE’s approach to the moral life?

A
  • Not knowing what to do in a situation doesn’t mean we do not throw rules away
  • Ross suggests we should apply the most relevant rules
  • Prima Facie Duties - Duties that should always be followed unless there is a reason for applying another duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What would Fletcher outcomes demonstrate?

A

Outcomes demonstrate how moral we are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Philiippa Foot’s objection? (Virtue Ethicists)

A
  • Focusing on outcomes does not allow us to develop as moral characters
  • Suggests we there are virtues that should be develop over time
  • Instead of thinking ‘what is the most loving outcome’ you should think ‘how can I live more virtuously’
17
Q

What would Fletcher say about situationism as a strength?

A

We do not need to look back on past experience to make a decision

18
Q

Aquinas’ objection?

A
  • It is human to look back on past experience and assess how well something worked
  • Aquinas believes that conscience is god given to help us evaluate past actions, current possibilities to deduce the right decision