Situation Ethics Flashcards
relativistic meaning…
recognises no universal moral norms or rules and proposes that each situation should be looked at independently
consequentialist meaning…
the application of agape also makes moral judgements based on the outcome of an action
teleological application because…
its concerned with the end goal which is always Christian love
Fletcher’s Book
“SE: the new morality” was based on the message that the absolute principle of right and good are not realistic and problematic when applied blindly
Fletcher argument
in order to make meaningful ethical decisions, the situation needs to be considered and doing what is right requires the practical application of agape
what is agape?
loving kindness, seen as the best form of love (Christian love)
each situation is…
not a blueprint of other circumstances so each situation is considered/judged independently and uniquely.
the churches ethical stance…
took a legalistic approach using “fabricated rules and regulations” as directives but was only “hurting people instead of helping people”
what is legalism?
the ides that ethics should be about accepting and adhering to laws and rules, these are considered to be absolute. e.g. a Christian legalist would feel obliged to follow all 1663 commandments to the very letter.
what is antinomianism?
the idea that ethics should not be bound by laws and rules, and should actively promote freedom from imposed rules. e.g. a Christian antinomianism would not feel obliged to follow the 10 commandments.
fletchers situation ethics approach
he takes “the middle way” between legalism and antinomianism so calls this situation ethics. for fletcher, freedom to reason is crucial. he didn’t embrace total autonomy as only saw love as the only principle as deciding on what to do should produce the most loving outcome.
What ‘God-given’ laws does Joseph Fletcher reject?
all except to ‘love God’ and ‘love thy neighbour’
at the time what was happening?
during the 1960s there was huge rejection of authority. like in the 50s illegal to be gay as stated in NML but fletcher changes this view.
why does fletcher reject legalism?
he believe that there should be flexibility and not absolute laws for morality.
why does fletcher reject antinomianism?
he believe that there should be flexibility and not absolute laws for morality. antinomians had no strategy and had no principles or maxims whatsoever