sinav 2 Flashcards
Bill of Rights Bill’i kim sunmustur?
the uk government - dominic raab (dönemin adalet bakanı)
bill of rights bill ne zaman sunulmustur?
22 june 2022. a week after the interim measure ruling of the ECtHR
ingilterede aihsi ic hukuka entegre eden anlasma?
human rights act 1998
human rights act kimin donemi?
tony blair isci partisi hukumeti
name two duty that bill excludes
- convention-compatible duty of interpretation of the courts
- strasbourg jurisprudence
in the bill, there are phrases like “courts” and “may”. what does may refers?
the word “may” refers to discretionary power. /takdir yetkisi
there is a provisiond stating that the courts may have regard to the preparatory work of the convention. what kind of doctrine this provision reflect?
this provision reflects an originalist doctrine associated with conservative- republican appointed judges in the us
what does echr system based on?
echr system based on the living instrument doctrine and evaluative interpretation
by excluding the positive obligations regarding a convention right, complete protection before courts and public authorities is not possible. true/false?
true
name two cases that proves hra’s positive obligations importance?
- hillsborough. liverpool
- regina v. secretary of the state for the home department (respondent) of Parte Amin (FC) (Appelant)
what does make the bill of rights bill amorphous?
discretionary power whether the courts shall apply common law precrdents or strasbourg jurisprudence ot its legal philosophy
what determines the meaning and effect of convention rights for domestic law?
supreme court
not echr
the bill explicitly prescribes that judgements of the ECtHR are not part of domestic law. true/false?
true but the strasbourg court has never become a superior court in the british constitutional order.
what leads to the principle of legislative supremacy in the british constitutional order?
non existence of a codifies/rigid constitution
not parliamentary democracy
bill policy making konusunda competing interest ve convention rightsa gore agir bi yuk veren hukme sahip mi?
evet ve bu provision is absurd and non functional cunku zaten anayasa yok westminister parlamentosundan kaynaklanan/ prevails over/ bi yasama //judiciary var
quash, strike down, annul, set aside the uk’de hangisi var? bunlarin farklari ne?
quash, strike down, set aside = declare void -> fiilen hukumsuz kilinir mevzuattan kalkmaz. annul’da mevzuattan kalkar/iptal edilir. kita avrupasinda annul var. ingilterede quash var
hra regime balances judicial supremacy and parliamentary sovereignty. true false?
true
under the hra system, the courts already lack the power of to quash or strike down legislation because of inconsistency with conversation rights. true false
true
provisions diverging from the echr
- the right to be tried before a jury draw attention. fair trial is already protected by echr and hra
- freedom of speech
- limited protection for convincted prisoners
- prohibit courts from finding deportation law to be incompatible with the right to family and private life w/o the existence of any extraordinaru circumstances
- forbid human rights litigations arising from acts of public authorities during overseas military operations
what is not changing in the bill?
- declaration of imcompatibility procedure
- acts of public authorities which are incompatible with convention rights are deemed unlawful
which courts may issue a declaration of incompability?
only the high courts
declaration of incompatibility
- only the high courts may issue
- not mandatory
- it doesnt affext the enforceability of the law to be applied in the particular case nor applies to the parties of the proceedings in which it is made.
what is the primary instrument of hra?
convention friendly interpretation
what is the hra’s aim?
- domestic integration of the echr system into the british legal system
is the bill of rights bill a upgrade of hra?
no. it s a complete repeal
the bill reflects a substantial deviation from the human rights regime and mindset which has been entranched for more than 20 years. true false
true