should we have a codified and entrenched constitution? Flashcards

1
Q

what type of constitution does the UK have

A

the UK has a very flexible uncodified constitution which is unentrenched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does uncodified means?

A

it isnt written in a single document and that it is very easy to change - only a simple act of parliament is required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the arguments for a codified constitution?

A
  • to safeguard citizens rights - moves by the conservatives to overturn the HRA suggest that these rights could be easily attacked
  • rights being enshrined in one document would make people more educated and clear on their rights.
  • it would give clarity over what is not constitutional - too often people in the UK are not aware of what governments can and cant do - prorogation of parliament
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the arguments for a codified constitution (2)

A
  • it would provide clear separation of powers and limits to the powers of institutions - weak separation atm with executive generally dominating house of commons
  • chance to remove the undemocratic parts of the UK such as the house of lords
  • greater understanding of the values of the UK as their has been a push to promote british values in schools
  • at the moment there is quite an non-uniform, assymetrical constitution (no english parliament) the logical thing to do would be to create a uniform constitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the arguments against a codified constitution?

A
  • there is no agreement over how a codified constitution would be created and who would create it - we have not just experienced an independence war or a revolution.
  • there is no consensus over what it would contain - it would likely contain things of the time and would be outdated in a few decades especially because the world is changing so fast
  • the current constitution has shown it can be adaptable, look at all the changes since 1997
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the arguments against a codified constitution (2)

A
  • codified constitutions are very hard to change and thus lead to outdated laws e.g., second amendment
  • a codified constitution would take power off elected politicians and give it to unelected judges - prorogation of parliament blocked by supreme court
  • there is no popular support for this change, constitutional changes such as regional assemblies have been dramatically rejected, suggesting there is a lack of support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly