Short form questions Flashcards
Firm has requested second opinion on adverse opinion audit given due to a disagreement over the accounting policies. What are the ethical issues and how should the firm deal with the issue?
Threat
- May compromise the opinion of the existing auditor
- Client may be opinion shopping
- Threat to professional competence and due care if they are only being asked to review it and give an opinion. May not gather full facts
- May be tempted to give an unqualified opinion in order to obtain the audit in the future
Actions required
- Obtain clients permission to contact the existing auditor
- Notify the auditor of the work to be undertaken
- Ensure your firm is in full possession of the facts
- If the client refuses permission to contact, refuse the audit
Regular fees from client company constitutes substantial proportion of fee income of an audit firm. Creates self-interest threat that may affect objectivity. What safeguards should be used and what procedures offsets it?
Safeguards
- Take regular reviews of the client position to ensure not becoming too higher proportion of income
Actions to offset risk
- Consider whether the client would be open to criticisms
Would need to refuse appointment or put safeguards in place to ensure the threat does not become active
- E.g. an indep review, and giving disclosure about the proportion of the fee to the ethics partner and those charged with governance
- Don’t accept the assignment if the total fees regularly exceed 15% of the annual income fee (or 10% for a listed company)
- Although it may be possible for another part of the firm to carry out this work
In planning an audit, the company still owes you £15,000 from last years audit fee. What is the threat to independence and what action should be taken in respect of this matter?
Overdue fees create a self-interest threat to independence
Issue of unmodified opinion this year may increase the chances of getting the fee back
Ideally would arrange to settle the overdue fees
Would consider resigning from the engagement if not settled and the fees are significant and in dispute
If don’t resign, apply appropriate safeguards e.g. second partner review
Notify the ethics partner
Discovery of periodic duplicate payments from a customer. Client has no intention to pay money back unless asked for it and is recording it as sales. State what action should be taken and why
Actions taken
Don’t tip off client, as this would harm any judicial proceedings.
This is a case of money laundering
Must be reported to the money laundering reporting officer (MLRO) of the firm
Must be reported to the National Crime Agency (NCA)
Must correct mis-allocation of duplicate payments into liabilities
Encourage the client to return the money
Why
Represents proceeds of crime/theft
It is a criminal for the auditors not to report it
Fraud has been discovered, including buyer in purch dept and purchase ledger clerk in acc dept for last 2 years. Managing director wrote to company auditor to say it is their responsibility to have found it and want an explanation of how the auditor missed it.
Duty is to report on the financial statements
No responsibility to detect such fraud
Audit conducted in accordance with ISAs is to provide reasonable assurance that FS are free from material misstatement caused by fraud or error
Auditors may not find material frauds
Frauds involving collusion are more difficult to find than say material misstatements by errors
Responsibility is set out in the engagement letter
Management is responsible for implementing and monitoring the systems of control
Company with doubled revenue each year, rapid expansion is expected to continue. Requires heavy inv in working capital, especially WIP and receivables. Company is seeking increase in borrowing facility when present facility is due for review in Sept. Growth this year has taken them over exemption threshold this year. What are the benefits they will obtain from the audit
Possible benefits
Independent confirmation of profits earned/net assets
Assurance of compliance with CA 2006
Recommendations on systems via management letter
Management is responsible for implementing and monitoring the system of control
Invited to tender for audit for hotel chain. You currently audit another chain with all similar towns and prices. What are the ethical issues that must be consider when deciding whether to tender and consider the procedures you may need to implement if successful in tender.
Principle issue is confidentiality.
They will both be worried that there will be a disclosure/use of information
Creates conflict of interest for the audit firm
Difficult to act in the best interests of both clients
Procedures
Ensure the staff are all aware of confidentiality issues
Staff must certify they are aware of confidentiality issues
Obtain informed consent from both clients
Inform both clients of situation
Use different partners and teams
Put information barriers in place
Arrange independent review of arrangements for ensuring confidentiality maintenance
Company has faced disappointing perf in last 3 months and seeking for extension to overdraft facility. Bank has asked audit to provide a report on working capital focusing on the trade receivables and inventory. Explain benefits and limitations to both bank and client of obtaining the working capital report
To the bank:
Reduces uncertainty about the reliability of the info and increases credibility
Reduces the risk of management bias/ improves independence of info
Enables to bak to determine risk in advancing more more to the company
May allow company to gain the overdraft they require to keep growing which might not have been possible without the audit report
Limitations to the bank
Only testing a sample, won’t look at all inventory and receivable balances can be looked at
There is always still a possibility of collusion/ misrepresentation
Evidence is likely to be persuasive rather than conclusive. Audit can’t provide absolute info. Will either be reasonable or limited depending on whether audit/assurance job
Report may not report the full extent of the problem/ may lack sufficient info
Inherent limitations of accounting system/ integrity of data
Audit partner in her firm has been appointed as a trustee of a trust, with owns 20% shares in the audit firm. She replaced the family solicitor whose retired. The audit manager has given one months notice that he’ll be leaving to become finance director of the company. State the threats to independence that these situations impose, and the safeguards that should be carried out to maintain objectivity.
Audit partner
Creates self-interest threat as has position of power in both
Trustee interest held by a person in a position of influence to the audit is only allowed by ES S2 where
She is not a beneficiary of the trust
The Financial interest held by the trust in the company is not material to the trust
The trust isn’t able to exercise signif influence over the trust
The audit partner doesn’t have signify influence over investment decisions made by the trust
Therefore, must transfer the audit responsibility onto another partner
Audit manager
Creates a familiarity/self-interest/intimidation threat
He should be removed immediately from the audit role
Review of the audit work performed by the audit manager who is leaving in the current year must be done
Firm should reassess composition of the audit team
The following is an extract from an indep profit forecast: ‘Based on evidence of assumptions, nothing has come to our attention to believe the assumptions don’t provide a reasonable basis for the forecast.’ Describe the level of assurance provided by this statement and explain how it differs from the level of assurance provided by an auditors report on annual historical FS
Accountants report provides -ve assurance (limited assurance)
How it differs
Audit provides a high level of assurance which is reasonable/not absolute assurance
Audit opinion is expressed in +ve terms - that the statements give a true and fair view in accordance with CA/directors’ report consistent
Why it differs
FS are based on facts as well as judgements
Persuasive evidence is available
Often the delay between reporting date and auditor’s report means that even items such as provisions/estimates can be substantiated
Scope of work on forecasts is limited as forecasts are based on assumptions about the future and as such as subject to uncertainty
Discover during audit that company’s sales manager, helped by the accounts clerk, has deliberately falsified details of the value of vehicles sold to increase his monthly bonus issue. Set out the responsibilities of auditor for this, and contrast with the responsibilities of the management of company.
Auditors responsibility
Not their responsibility to prevent fraud
Responsibility is to detect material misstatements in the FS, whether due to fraud or error
Must design audit procedures to obtain reasonable assurance that FS are free from material misstatements, whether caused by fraud or error
Must make a report to relevant authorities under money laundering regulations
Mustn’t tip off the accounts clerk or the manager as this may damage judicial procedures
Management responsibilities
Responsible for preventing fraud
Responsible for detecting fraud
Must implement system of internal control suitable for business
Must monitor their internal control systems
Responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company
Firm’s largest client account (non-listed) has audit fee of £468,000 per year. They also provide tax services for £179,000 per year. Total fee income is estimated at £6,200,000, including the above fees. Outline the ethical issues
Ethical issues
Fee income from company is 10.44% of firms total income
This is above to 10% ‘review’ limit for non-listed clients
But under 15% limit for being allowed to carry out the work
Creates self-interest threat- if the firms objectivity is impaired if they are worried they might lose the audit, which accounts for signify proportion of firms income
Creates self-review threat for tax work if the numbers significantly impact the FS
How to address the situation
Disclose fee % to ethics partner and those charged with governance at the company
Independent quality review required by a partner not connected with the audit
If it is likely to exceed the 10% on ar regular basis, they should arrange an external quality reviewer
Separate teams for the audit and tax work can reduce the self-review threat
Consider resignation from the tax work if the issues can’t be sufficiently safeguarded agains
1.13 An audit firm is the external auditor for Kerry Ltd for year ended 31 May 20X9. Following due diligence claim, Kerry acquired trade and assets of Blue Ltd from liquidator in Jan 20X9 .These are included in SFP in 31 May 20X9. Identify and explain the principal threat to your firm’s objectivity in respect of audit of FS for Kerry for ye 31 May 20X9 and state safeguards that should be applied.
Self review threat- auditors may be reluctant to identify impairments
Audit team may rely too heavily on their colleagues work
Safeguards
Members of audit team shouldn’t be involved in due diligence investigation
Explain why external auditor of a company should be objective and independent
because issues arising in FS are often judgemental
Audit needs to be unbiased in preparing the opinion
Need to determine if the directors have made biased judgements
Needs to adopt a rigorous and robust approach to identify bias or inappropriate judgement
Audit opinion must only be based on the evidence available to them
Independence increases the likelihood of objectivity
Lack of independence may negatively harm the public confidence in the auditors objectivity
This would reduce the credibility and reliability of audit reports
This would render them useless
Objecitivity and integrity are required by Ethical Standard S1 and the CA2006
Long standing auditor for a firm. The engagement partner has held the position for 4 years and they are in the process of becoming a listed company. Directors have requested they continue as audit partner once the company is listed. What are the ethical issues arising and what safe guards should be adopted in respect of the request
Creates long association issue between company and auditor
May give rise to familiarity threat
Audit partner may be too trusting of the client/client representations
Ethical Guidelines S3 are rotation of unlisted company eng partner is 10 years
For listed company, only 5 years
Where the entity becomes listed, length of time they have already acted as partner must be considered
If partner has served 4 years or more, can only continue for 2 years once listed with safeguards in place
So if he does continue for allowed further 2 years, safeguards must be put in place
Examples
Independent partner review of audit work
Communicate the maximum number of years with the client
Document reasons for allowing him to continue
Self-interest threat may arise for fear of losing the client if he doesn’t remain eng partner per their request
Seek advice from ethics partner
Describe the role of the ethics partner within the external audit firm
Responsible for the adequacy of firms policies and procedures regarding integrity, objectivity and independence
Responsible for compliance with FRC Ethical Standard
Responsible for effectiveness of communication of ethical requirements with partners and staff
Provides ethical guidance to other partners and staff
Give consideration to whether policies and procedures are properly covered in training
Provide guidance where difficult and objective judgement needs to be made or a consistent position reached
Assesses the implications of any breach of the FRC Ethical Standard
Determines whether any safeguards are put in place o where there is a need to resign from engagements
During audit, employee states MD asked employee not to record a transaction in acc records because it was not business related. It was a cash deposit paid into company bank account, and then a week later was paid out to friend of MD. Amount isn’t material in the context of any key figures in FS. How should the auditor deal with this matter?
Report MD to Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)
Must avoid tipping off the client as this may harm judicial procedures
Must report to National Crime Agency (NCA)
Legal requirement for auditor to do this
As there is a suspect of money laundering
Appears to be transferring/disguising proceeds
No ‘de minimis’ where money laundering is concerned
i.e. no materiality level
1.18 Explain fundamental principle of professional competence and due care. Provide 2 examples of how chartered acc can identify whether partners and staff are complying with this principle.
Professional competence states that the CA must maintain a high standard of professional skill to ensure they can provide a professional service, based on current development in practice and techniques.
Due care means must act diligently in all professional work and in accordance with applicable technical and professional standards when providing an professional service.
Identify compliance
If there is on the job supervision of junior staff
Review of staff work by more senior members
Hot/internal quality control reviews
Cold reviews/monitoring
Staff appraisals
Staff training
1.19 During audit, discover the directors have accounted for research costs inappropriately, creating material misstatement. Firm plans to issue modified statement if not corrected. During conversation, MD indicated man intend to seek the removal of the firm of you as external auditors if a modified opinion is given. Explain what actions should be taken in response to conversation.
Discuss the issue with directors and request that they amend the FS, as a modified opinion would be avoided if they amend appropriately and understand the problem of the incorrect accounting treatment.
Creates intimidation threat if they are threatening to remove them
This suggests the integrity of the man may be compromised, may want to consider further independent internal quality review, as this knowledge may mean the objectivity of other areas of the audit has been compromised.
Seek legal advice or advice from the ethics partner to ensure that the firm’s exposure to any risk is limited
Consider resignation as the directors’ actions represent an intimidation threat and could break down trust as well as raising doubts about the integrity of management
Your firm receives notice that a listed company won’t reappoint you as the external auditor as the audit committee has recommended another firm. Set out the rights and responsibilities of your firm, including those under CA2006, relating to the change in appointment
Rights
Make written representations and request directors to circulate it to members
Attend and speak at a general meeting
Responsibilities
Prepare a statement of circumstances
Specifying reasons for ceasing to hold office
To be deposited at the company’s registered office and sent to the Registrar and Companies House
As they are listed, there is no option to state no circumstances
Obtain permission from client to reply to the prospective auditors’ communications
Return promptly all books and records of the company
Maintain client confidentiality after ceasing to act
Maintain anti-anti-money laundering identification records
Audit irm has been approached to accept appointment as external auditor for YE 30 June 20X6. Previous auditor issued a qualified opinion, due to a disagreement in acc policies for inventory valuation. Was cited in their letter in response to your letter requesting info that might influence your decision about whether to accept the engagement Previous auditor stated existing fees remained unpaid
Ethical issues
Previous auditors don’t appear to have been reappointed due to giving an unqualified opinion
Directors may now be opinion shopping
Raises doubts over the man integrity and objectivity
Suggests possible intimidation threat, which could result in self-interest threat if the firm fees non-payment of their own fees
However, these don’t preclude the acceptance
Actions to take
Review prior year FS and auditors report to establish the acc policy for inventory valuation and ascertain the basis for the qualification
Consider whether you agree with the qualification basis
If the firm agrees, discuss with man whether they intend to change the acc policy
Ascertain from management the reason for overdue fees in respect of prior year audit
Consult with audit firm’s ethics partner
Decline appointment if they suggest that non-payment is a result of previous auditors’s qualification report
Carry out a background check on management
Explain why external auditors must monitor length of time of eng partners serving on eng team for each audit
Audit firm is required by Ethical Standard S3 to establish policies and procedures because of long association with the audit eng, as this may create threats to objectivity and independence resulting from
Self interest
Self-review
Familiarity
E3 sets out mandatory requirement for audit of listed companies, where eng partner must be rotated every 5 years
E3 also sets out recommendations for rotation of eng partners for non-listed companies, which is every 10 years. However, this isn’t compulsory
A firm may need to
Apply safeguards to reduce any threats to an acceptable level
Resign from the audit if appropriate safeguards can’t be applied