Short Answers Flashcards
- What 2 points made in R v Harney: Recklessness
Recklessness involves foresight of dangerous consequences that could well happen together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of the risk
- When interviewing victim defrauded what 2 questions ask?
- Ask what identity used by the offender and descriptions and property obtained
- What the false representations and inducements that were made to them were
- Ingredients forgery offences set out 256(1) CA 61?
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who::
- Makes a false document
- With the intention of using it
- to obtain
- any property OR priviledge OR service OR pencunairy advantage OR benefit OR valuable consideration
- Four enquiries to make regarding offender opening acct with bank for chq fraud?
- The account number and date it was opened
- The nature and amount of first deposits
- The details used when the account was opened
- Descriptions of the suspect and any of their associates at the time
- Ingrediants of 228 CA ‘61 taking or using documents?
- With intent to obtain
- Any property OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR valuable consideration
- Dishonestly AND
- Without claim of right
- (a) Takes OR Obtains any document
- (b) Uses OR Attempts to use any document
- Apart from false representation what else constitutes deception as defined 240(2)?
240(2)(b)
- An omission to disclose a material particular with intent to deceive any person in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it;
OR
240(2)(c)
- a fraudulent device, trick or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person
- Offender uses false name and address to hire drill. Found at his home months later, claims was going to return it at some stage, what appropriate charge and who has title?
Obtaining ownership, possession or control by deception 240 (1)(a) CA 61
- By any deception AND
- Without claim of right
- Obtains ownership OR Possession OR control over
- Any Property OR any Privilege OR Service OR Pecuniary advantage OR Benefit OR Valuable consideration
- Directly OR Indirectly
- offender has no title as goods were not passed on, possession only
- Ingrediants obtain credit by deception, 240(1)(b)?
Everyone is guilty of obtaining by deception OR causing loss by deception who:
- By any deception AND
- Without claim of right
- In incurring any debt OR liability
- Obtains credit
- What was held in R v Morley as relates to 240(2) CA 61 - intention to deceive?
An intention to deceive requires that the deception is practised in order to decieve the affected party. Purposeful intent is necessary and must exist at the time of the deception
- Paul takes deposits for work can’t complete to pay bills. Is he liable for deception, explain answer?
Obtaining by deception OR Causing Loss by deception s240(1)(a) CA 61
- An ommision to disclose [s240(2)(b)] a material particular
- With intent to deceive any person
- In circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it
Paul is liable for deception as he omits to tell clients about a material particular (his situation and back log of jobs and financial situation) he deceives them by continuing to collect deposits anyway. As he is promising a service for the deposits he is collecting so he is duty bound to disclose the information about what state his business is in.
- What is meant by the terms Debt and Liablity:
- Debt = means money owing from one person to another
- Liability = legally enforceable financial obligation to pay, such as the cost of a meal
- Where person induced to part with goods, what 2 steps can take to avoid title being transfered to deceivers?
- Communicate to the deceiver. Taking all possible steps to bring it to their attention (eg in writting, text, phone etc)
- By advising Police the property has been obtained by deception
- 3 elements must prove under 259 CA 61 (using altered docs)
- Must know the relevant matters ie documents were altered with intent
- Must have intended to obtain by deception any property OR privilege OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR benefit OR valuable consideration
- Must be an intention to acquire/retain the property etc OR to cause loss ‘by deception’
- How is term ‘representation’ interpreted, state case law?
- Representation is a statement made by way of allegation or to convey opinion
- It can be made orally, by documents or conduct but must contain a proposition of fact.
R v Morley states “representations must relate to a statement of existing fact rather than statement of future intention”
- Offender presents item with 2 different price tags, shows lower amount, what offence, who has title:
Obtained Property by Deception 240(1)(a) CA 61
Everyone is guilty of obtaing by deception OR causing loss by deception who:
- By any deception AND
- Without claim of right
- Obtains ownership/possession of OR control over
- Any property OR any privilege OR service OR percuniary advantage OR benefit OR valuable consideration
- Directly OR Indirectly
- Offender has voidable title until store voids and they then get good title back