Short Answers 2 Flashcards
Criteria for a surveillance device warrant - Section 51 S&S Act 2012
There are reasonable grounds:
1. To suspect that an offence has been committed or is being committed or will be committed in respect of which this Act or any enactment specified in column 2 of the schedule authorizes the enforcement officer to apply for a warrant to enter the premises for the purpose of obtaining evidence about the suspected offence and
2. To believe that the proposed use of the surveillance device will obtain information that is evidential material in respect of the offence and
The restrictions in section 45 do not prevent the issue of a surveillance device warrant in the circumstances.
A high standard of evidence is required to satisfy the judge which means that you will have to disclose in the application certain matters that you would normally regard as confidential.
Detail Internal search section 13a - summary on pg 74
Differences between 13A MODA 75 and section 23 SASA2012 (internal searches) pg 73
MODA 75 - Reasonable cause to believe (and not arrested)
S&S 12 - Must be under arrest for offence against Section 6,7 or 11 of Moda75. Constable must have reasonable grounds to believe person has secreted within body any property that may be evidence of the offence with which person is charged or other offence against Section 6, 7 or 11 of Moda.
A person is arrested for a drug dealing related offence, suspect that he is possibly concealing drugs internally, can you search that person under 13A moda75?
Section 16 bail act pg 114
A defendant who is charged with or convicted of a drug dealing offence may be granted bail:
(a) In any case by order of a High Court Judge or
(b) If the Defendant does not have any previous conviction for a drug dealing offence, by order of a District Court Judge.
12 things you must do for initial action at clan labs where CYPs located
- Removal of the CYP from the immediate scene
- Assigning of an Officer to look after and monitor the CYP
- Assessment of the CYP for injury, illness, or respiratory distress- If a CYP is in need of immediate medical attention this may take priority over decontamination requirements.
- The O/C investigation must ensure that the Medical facility is notified of the contamination issue prior to admission
- Request for CYFs attendance at the scene
- Distribution of suitable personal protective equipment to OT staff together with a decontamination kit for each CYP.
- Most appropriate decontamination for the CYP.
- Photographing of the CYP at the scene.
- Recording of the physical condition of the CYP including any injuries
- Recording of the mental state of the CYP
- Consideration of swabbing the CYP for chemical residues ESR - Ensure the application and search warrant authorizes Police to cause swab or sample to be taken from any CYP present at the premises.
- Securing the clothing worn by the CYP as an exhibit.
Things to cover in initial interview with CYP at clan lab
- Basic health questions such as headaches, nausea, breathing, difficulty, dizziness, fatigue etc
- The occupants details
- Details of other siblings or CYPS at the address
- The sleeping arrangements
- The playing and eating areas
- School and preschool details
- The name of the cyps doctor
- Knowledge of drugs, manufacturing, dealing activities
- Police do not arrange placement for the CYP. That is CYFS role
How many days can a surveillance warrant be in force?
60 days
Who leads the controlled drug delivery operation?
Customs
Two methods of delivery of drugs to ESR pg 116
- Delivery in person to the to the analyst who is to issue the certificate or to a person authorised by the analyst to receive it.
- Delivery via Registered post or registered courier with a signature required in a sealed package to an employee who has been authorized by the analyst in charge at the laboratory.
What was held in R v Rua?
The word Produce or Manufacture broadly covers the creation of a controlled drug by some form of process by changing the original substance to a particular controlled drug.
Does a CHIS have to be named in a warrant - legislation section 64 evidence act or case law (R v McGintry) pg 85
It is good practice not to state the name of any covert human intelligence source.
You are not required by law to name your CHIS. Disclosure of the identity of alleged informants was not required under the Act, and the trial judge was correct in deleting from the application certain parts which would have been likely to lead to the identification of informants. However, the trial Judge was entitled to insist on disclosure if he saw fit.
Is it possible to be charged with attempted possession (Police v Jay) pg 33
Yes it is Chilwell J held that the commission of the offence of receiving cannabis was not legally impossible, although in the circumstances it was factually impossible. As the respondent had criminal intent and did an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object he was guilty of an attempt to commit an offence.
In relation to importing, when is someone liable and when does liability cease? pg 11
Criminal liability arises as soon as the drugs cross the NZ border and an importer may therefore be convicted under section 6 (1) (a) even if the drugs are intercepted by Customs and never reach the addressee.
However, the offence does not end at the border, the process of importation continues while the goods are in transit and only concludes when they have reached their final destination and available to the consignee.
4 things that must be done in first 24 hours (o/c phones) pg 96
- Trapping or preloading phone data
- TSP liaison- Establish an effective working relationship with the TSP. Find one person at your TSP to deal with the enquiry. Ownership is critical.
- Draft a Production Order application early, A production order application outlines the backbone of the enquiry. This will form the basis of all future production order and potentially search warrant applications.
- No search warrant required for Emergency situations
What must be proved for importation (men’s rea) pg 12
This will involve proof that the Defendant:
1. Knew about the importation and
2. Knew the imported substance was a controlled drug and
3. Intended to cause the importation.
How do you prove age for a victim? (R v Forrest and Forrest)
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victim’s age.