Short Answer + Multiple Choice Questions Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of Perjury?

A

Perjury is an assertion as to any matter of fact, or belief, or opinion, or knowledge in any court proceeding that forms part of that witnesses evidence on oath, and known by that witness to be false, and intended to mislead the tribunal in court proceedings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Does mere preparation of an offence constitute as an attempt?

A

No. For it to constitute as an attempt the proximity to completing the full offence must be close.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List FOUR elements under S243(2) Crimes Act 1961 - Money Laundering

A

In respect of ANY property
That is the proceeds
Engages in a Money Laundering transaction
Knowing or Believing that all or part of the property is proceeds of an offence, or being reckless as to whether or not the property is proceeds of an offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What enquiries should you conduct to prove a person was a party to an offence?

A
  1. Witnesses providing information that someone else was involved.
  2. Suspect acknowledging someone else was involved.
  3. Suspect or witness admissions
  4. Information from other sources suggesting someone else was involved.
  5. Reconstruction of the scene suggesting someone else was involved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

List all elements for Parties to an offence - Section 66(1) C.A. 1961

A

Everyone is a party to an offence if they:
a. actually commit the offence
b. to do or omit an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit an offence
c. abets any person to commit an offence
d. incites, procures, or counsels any person in the commisison of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the difference between s66(1) and s66(2)?

A

s66(1) is the offending of persons involved are a party to the intended offence. Where as s66(2) deals with offenders with the same common intention who commit an offence, and then go on to commit another offence as a result of the first offence .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline the knowledge/belief needed to prove a charge of money laundering?

A
  • MUST be an interest in the property and
  • hide/conceal how they obtained that property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can a person be charged with a conspiracy to commit an offence overseas?

A

Yes, if it is an offence in New Zealand. They only have a defence if it is not an offence in the country they are going to commit it in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline FOUR points when interviewing an offender on conspiracy

A
  • Was anything written down
  • Existence of the agreement to commit the offence
  • Persons involved
  • Intention of all parties involved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

List all the elements for an Attempts s72(1) Crimes Act 1961

A
  • Having intent to commit an offence
  • Does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his/her objective
  • Is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name three things you must prove for an Attempt:

A
  1. Intent (mens rea)
  2. Act (Actus reus)
  3. Proximity to completion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is your understanding of sufficiently proximate to the full offence?

A

Preparation, then steps taken towards completing an offence, (i.e. multiple acts undertaken), and the judge decides whether it is sufficiently proximate to the full offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was held in R v Harpur?

A

Have regard to the conduct viewed together up to the point where the conduct stops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the test for Proximity and who decides it?

A
  1. Has the offender done anything to get themselves into a position to embark on an attempt, or
  2. Has the offender actually commenced execution (taken a step towards committing it)

If the answer is YES to either then the judge decides as its a question of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the difference between aiding and abeting/ counsels/procures.

A

Aiding and Abeting requires someone to be present at the scene. Where as Incites/Counsels/Procures they all occur before the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What needs to be proved to be a party to?

A
  1. The suspect is identified
  2. The offence has been completed.
  3. Elements of s66(1) has been committed.
17
Q

In relation to proof of assistance what was held in Larkins v R

A

There must be actual proof the Principal was aware of assistance

18
Q

Name four factors of misleading justice

A
  • Preventing a witness from testifying
  • As a witness ‘not turning up’
  • Bribing a jury member
  • Arranging a False Alibi
  • Giving false information to Police to disrupt their enquiries
  • Hiding the fact an offence was committed.
19
Q

Explain the concept of title

A

Title is a persons legal right to the good/s
Voidable Title is a title obtained by deception

20
Q

Explain how title can be voided:

A
  • Complaint to the Police
    -Communication with the deceiver
  • All reasonable steps taken to advise the deceiver.
21
Q

What is Tainted Property?

A

It is property that has been acquired from criminal activity OR directly or indirectly derived by criminal activity