Short and Long term memory Flashcards

1
Q

give a history of memory:

Hint (Plato, Freud and James)

A

First idea of STM: Plato (424-348bc) (wax model)
Distinctions between 2 types of memory:
Late 19th century
Freud: Surface ( transitory, temporary) and Deep (Permanent)
William James: Primary (stream of consciousness) and Secondary ( Memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline the three memory systems

A

Sensory memory
Stm (working memory)
Ltm `

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outine sensory memory

A

A large capacity, literal record of perceptual experience
Lost very quickly (transient)
Sensory memory: Visual and auditory
• Iconic memory (or ‘Visual sensory register’) – Holds visual input for 50 msec – Representation is pre-categorical (literal record of percept)
• Echoic memory (or ‘Auditory sensory register’) – Holds auditory input for 2-3 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

give a piece of research conducted to study iconic element of sensory memory

A

Sperling’s (1960) Iconic Memory Research
Whole report procedure – Flash a matrix of letters and digits for 50 milliseconds
– Identify as many items as possible
– Participants typically remembered 4 items

• Partial Report Procedure
– Flash a matrix of letters and digits for 50 milliseconds – Participants are told to report items in just one row – Participants were able to report any row requested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline the model fo free recall

A

serial position curve
first few items recall high…reall then drops on next few items before rising again for last
excellent recall on kst few items= recency effect
excellent recall on first few items= primacy effect
-less pronounced than recency effect
if recall delayed by additional task- no recency effect seen
Glanzer and Cunitz (1966)
first few items held in LTM
last few held in STM
-extra attentional tasks eliminate STM contribution so recency disappears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the capacity
code
duration
of STM?

A
capacity: 
digit span: digit span-
 7+/- 2 (Miller, 1956) items
- can be improved via chunking  
Cowan 2000- 7 is an over-estimate (more like 4 +/-1) 

Code: Short-term memory thought to be based on a verbal (“phonological”) code
duration: short (around 30 seconds)
Evidence for phonological coding in short-term memory
• Phonological similarity effect – words that ‘sound’ alike more poorly recalled than dissimilar sounding words (Baddeley (1966a, cited in Baddeley, 1990))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the evidence for phonologica lencoding in memory

A

Word length effect: recall of words is worse for longer words than for shorter words
• The word-length effect is eliminated if phonological coding is prevented through ‘articulatory suppression’ (e.g., counting or repeating an Irrelevant word, “the, the, the…”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline the multistore model of memory

A

stimuli –> sensory store –> STM (maintance) –> rehersal–> LTM
Maintenace rehearsal

Then transferred from STM to LTM by rehearsal
To be recalled has to be transferred back to STM
(Attkinson and shiffrin image)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline baddeleys working memory model

A

model of STM
imput -> sensory memory -> attention–> central exec–>VSS/phonological loop(artiulary control and phonoligcal store) –> episodic buffer –>LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Characteristics of Ltm?
Duration
Capacity
Code?

A

Duration: decreases rapidly at first but slows down after 3 years
capacity: Standing (1973): “Learning 10,000 Pictures”
- Participants could recognise 133/160 pictures selected randomly from about 10,000 pictures studied earlier - Must have had a long-term memory trace of ~6,600 of the pictures
- “The capacity of recognition memory for pictures is almost limitless.” - Pictures better recognised than words. Why…?
Because of dual coding (Paivio, 1969)- seeing an image and describing it yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline the dual coding hyptohesis

A

Paivio, 1969

  • seeing an image and describing it yourself
  • 2 methods of encoding
  • 2 routes of retreival (visual and verbal)
  • theroefore easier
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline the differences between implicit and explicit memory

A

• Explicit memory – when retrieval of a memory is deliberate/requires conscious recollection. Also called declarative memory

  • note that short-term remembering is also typically ‘explicit’

• Implicit memory – when behaviour indicates that memories are being retrieved in the absence of a deliberate, conscious, attempt to retrieve them

E.g., - procedural memory

  • much of recognition memory is implicit (e.g., for very familiar faces; the meaning of common words)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the sub-types of explicit memory:

A

Explicit memories typically divided into two types (Tulving, 1983):
– Semantic memories (general knowledge about the world)
– Episodic memories (memories for experiences/events)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the differences between episodic and semnatic memory types?

A

source of info: snesory experience (episodic) comprehension (semantic)

units of info: events (epsiodic) Knowledge (semantic)
orgnanisational: time-related (episodic) conceptual(semantic)
emotional content of memory: more important (episodic) less importnat (semantic)
liklihood of forgetting great (episodic) small (semantic)
time reuqired to remember great (episodic) small (semantic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how is semantic memory organised?

A

Collins, A. & Quillian, M. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247

semantic knowledge organised like a Hierarchy- reaction times slower –> takes a while to get down the pathway.
)
tested using facts of association and reaction times e.g. should be easy to decide “cananry is yellow” because they’re stored on same leel of hierarchy however “cananry” can fly” two nodes stored seperately so should take longer
-found prediction correct
However, Conrad found that when you controlled for familiarity in this study, the effect disappears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline Collins and Loftus interpretation on organisation of semantic memory:

A

Spreading activation through the semantic memory network Collins and Loftus (1975)
sematic knowledge based on basic relatedness can be studied by asking people how closely related pairs are
acording to this model
when a concpet is thought about the appropriate node is activated which spreads to more storngly associated concpets
as a result producing the typicality effect.

Semantic priming effect shows as evidence (Bread more likely to be recognised if procceeded by butter than by nurse) Meyer & Schvaneveldt, 1976

17
Q

Explain the ‘Moses illusion’

A

This ‘Moses illusion’ depends on semantic similarity/links
• Due to spreading activation, and reliance on partial matches (Kamas & Reder, 1995) - We don’t always encode information perfectly, because it’s typically safe to rely on a partial match.

18
Q

define chunk

A

“integrated piece of information”

19
Q

difernece between LTM and STM in forgetting, encoding speed

A

Peterson- Forgetting in STM due to trace decay – automatic fading of a memory trace

By contrast frogetting in LTM is due to interferecne- one memory trace impacting with another.
Another difference between visual STM and LTM is in encoding speed. This is quite rapid for visual STM. Figure 3.6 shows the results of a study by Vogel, Woodman and Luck (2006) who presented arrays of one to four colored squares, interrupting the display with a mask, after delays ranging from 100 to 350 ms. As Figure 3.6 shows, participants were able to register individual objects at a rate of approximately 50 ms per stimulus, leveling off in this study at around a capacity of 2.5 squares. In contrast, visual LTM tends to benefit from longer exposure, in line with the total time hypothesis (see p. 108), with the Standing (Standing et al., 1970) study presenting stimuli for 10 seconds each, and the later studies described by Brady et al. (2011) typically using 3 to 5 seconds per picture.

20
Q

On an SDT graph what does discriminability change?

A

the more discriminability then the further apart the “lures” and “target” curves are.

21
Q

How does lineup presentation affect ROC and CAC (Simultaneous and sequential)

A

simultaneous= all perps in a line up together
sequential= perps come in one by one
sequential decreases ROC
CAC:
simultanoeus= higher accuracy on lower, middle and higher confidence
sequential = similar to standard CAC curve.

22
Q

what is the difference between discriminability and reliability in EWT

A

discriminability -> ability to distinguish between innocent and guilty suspects measured by ROC

Reliability -> liklihood that chosen suspect is guilty
measured by CAC -> confidence- accuracy characteristic
-> plays big role for judges and jurors

23
Q

How does verbal overshadowing (describing perp before line up)
affect ROC and CAC

A

describing perp before line up

  • > decreases ROC (discriminability)
  • > no real affect on CAC
24
Q

On a SDT graph, how do the respondents answers effect the dotted line

A

less yes = conservative, line moves right, less hits, less false alarms

more yes = libral, lines moves left, more hits, more false alarms