Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Melissa's Social Psychology Class > Sherif- Classic Study > Flashcards

Sherif- Classic Study Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

What was the aim of Sherif’s study?

A

To test in-group behaviours development to include related out-group hostility (through competition) and how this can be reduced (using a super-ordinate goal).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which participants took part in the study?

A

22 boys from Oklahoma who were 11 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The participants were similar on

A

IQ and sporting ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phase 1 was known as?

A

Ingroup formation stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened in Phase 1?

A

The groups were kept separate and were left to bond with tasks like camping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Phase 2 was known as?

A

the friction phase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the results of Phase 1?

A

The boys built social norms and hierarchies etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Phase 3 was known as?

A

Integration phase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in phase 2?

A

The boys took part in a tournament including tug of war baseball and bean counting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the results of phase 2?

A

The rattlers and the eagles showed prejudice like name calling scuffles flag burnings and raids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Did bringing the boys together to watch a film reduce their prejudice in phase 2/3?

A

No- they boys showed prejudice making comments like ladies first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in stage 3 of Sherif?

A

The boys were given superordinate goals like fixing the watersupply together so they could access clean water

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the results of Phase 3?

A

Boys were actively seeking opportunities to mingle entertain and treat each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What percentage change did we see in rattlers who saw eagles as a friend from S2 to S3?

A

30pc from 6.4 to 36.4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which four research methods were used in the study?

A

Tape recordings Observations Sociometric data and tasks like the bean counting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are three superordinate goals?

A

Fix the water supply Pull the broken down truck Chip in to pay for a movie

17
Q

Sherif is not generalisable because

A

It is both Androcentric and Ethnocentric because it only uses 22 american boys. This means the results about prejudice caused by competition dont apply to females or other cultures

18
Q

Sherif is reliable because

A

Yes because there were certain things that were standardised like the tasks and the measures like the tape recordings

19
Q

Sherif is not reliable because?

A

Much of what happened at the camp couldnt be standardised e.g. extraneous variables in the summer camp making it hard to repeat the same

20
Q

What are three strengths for validity of Sherifs study?

A

High ecological validity Reduced Demand Characteristics and Triangulation of data

21
Q

Why is Sherif high in ecological validity?

A

The summer camp is a natural setting for the boys so their prejudice behaviour might be like what they would show in real life

22
Q

How did this study get triangualtion of data?

A

The four measurements of the boys mean the results can be checked against each other giving concurrent validity

23
Q

Does this study have an issue with extraneous variables?

A

Yes because there are factors in the summer camp beyond the competition/superordinate goals which could effect the boys e.g. interactions with the counsellors

24
Q

Does this study have high or low demand characteristics?

A

Low Demand Characteristics because the boys didnt know they were being studied about prejudice

25
Q

Does this study have issues with informed consent?

A

Yes because the boys didnt know they were being studied/why their parents had however given some level of consent

26
Q

Does this study have an issue with protection from harm?

A

Yes because the children got into fights which could have resulted in injuries

27
Q

Does this study have issues with withdrawal?

A

To some degree some boys did leave because they were homesick but they didnt know they were being studied which means they couldnt leave the study

Melissa's Social Psychology Class (12 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions