Shareholders' rights and remedies Flashcards
What is the principle of ‘majority rule’?
Important decisions of a company are reserved to (the majority of) shareholders - often little a minority can do unless they join forces with other shareholders to block minority
As minority protections/remedies are costly/uncertain, what is preferable?
Entering into a shareholders’ agreement - establishes how a company is to be run between shareholders and how they vote on certain matters
What are all (7) remedies/protections available to shareholders?
- Membership rights under the Articles (s33)
- Shareholders’ agreements
- Shareholders’ rights CA 2006
- Removal of directors (s168)
- Derivative actions (s260)
- Unfair prejudice actions (s994)
- Just and equitable winding up (s122 IA)
What is the effect of s33 for members re Articles and what remedy does it provide?
I.e. membership rights under the Articles
- Members can sue under s33 if membership rights are infringed (as Articles are effectively a contract between members/each other and members/company)
- Remedy will usually be damages
What have been considered to be membership rights of any shareholder (and thus enforceable under s33)?
- Right to dividend (once delcared)
- Right to share in surplus capital on winding up
- Right to vote at meetings (or appoint proxy)
- Receive copy of accounts
- Inspect minutes and company registers
- Right to receive notice of GMs and AMs
- Use remedies - derivative claim, unfair prejudice, j+e winding up
What are the membership rights of those with 5%/more and 10%/more?
- 5%/more = require directors to call GM, require circulation of written statements regarding proposed resolutions for GM, circulate WR
- 10%/more = demand a poll vote
What are the membership rights of those with over 25% and over 50% shareholding?
- Over 25% = block special resolution
- Over 50% = pass or block ordinary resolution (those with 50% can block but cannot pass OR alone)
What will not be enforceable under s33?
Rights of members which are not ‘membership rights’ e.g. right to be appointed as company solicitor not a membership right (Eley)
Will the court imply terms into Articles for business efficacy? Should something different be used?
No - Articles are a complete contract. Any rights that are not membership rights should be set out in separate contract (shareholders’ agreement)
What is the purpose of a shareholders’ agreement?
An extension to Articles to contain provisions that the law does not permit Articles to contain
Could rely solely on Articles - but SA usually entered into
Will a shareholders’ agreement overrule law?
No - but gives personal rights/obligations that can be enforced personally
What are the likely provisions in a SA?
- Unanimous voting over certain matters e.g. removing a director
- Quorum for GMs
- Dividend policy
- Allotment of new shares
- New and departing shareholders
What is the difference between SA and Articles?
SA = contract between some/all of shareholders to agree how to regulate company - provisions are agreed more freely and constitute personal rights/obligations on shareholders
Articles = ‘contract’ between company and shareholders in their capacity as shareholders and does not deal with personal rights/obligations - provisions are subject to CA
What right of action does a SA give to a minority shareholder?
If a SA term is breached, it can be enforced by a member under contract law principles
Provision that would not be regarded as membership right can be enforced
If certain matters are reserved in SA as requiring the consent of all/certain shareholders, will a resolution passed without the required unanimity be void?
E.g. reserved matter in SA that removal of a director must be with unanimity, but then an OR is passed with the required majority (>50%)
- No! Resolution will still be valid as it is in accordance with CA 2006 - company must accept the vote of a shareholder in spite of SA (so a director will be removed!)
- But a director has a claim against other shareholders for breach of SA
The threat of breach = influence over the resolution
The right of the shareholders are not removed by the SA, but it does provide a personal right to be enforced against them
How might amending Articles be different to amending SA?
Whereas Articles can be amended with SR, SA may require unanimity to amendments = minority party can veto any proposed changes
What resolution must be used to remove a director (before the expiration of their office period)?
Ordinary resolution
I.e. the ‘removal resolution’
Can the Board remove a director?
Not unless the Articles specifically permits
Can directors (who are also shareholders) vote in their capacity as shareholder on the OR to remove them?
YEs!
What can not be used by a company to remove a director?
A written resolution
What kind of notice is required for a removal resolution from a proposing shareholder and how long is this (before what event)?
A special notice - 28 clear days before GM at which removal resolution voted on by shareholders
I.e. shareholders proposing removal resolution must give notice of it to board at least 28 days before GM
If the board places the removal resolution on the agenda of the next GM, what notice must it give shareholders? What if this is not practical?
- 14 clear days’ notice of removal resolution (at same time as it gives notice of GM)
- If not practical - e.g. notice of GM already sent out - may be given in any other mode (e.g. advert) allowed in Articles at least 14 days before GM
Must a board place the removal resolution from shareholders on the agenda of the next GM?
No - can simply ignore proposed removal resolution = not considred at GM
What can shareholders do to get around the fact that directors may ignore their removal resolution?
Use s303 request - shareholders holding together not less than 5% of paid up voting share capital can serve a request on board requiring it to call a GM
Must state general nature of business shareholders wish to be dealt with
Is the power of shareholders to call a GM (s303) limited to removal resolutions?
No - the power of directors to require board to call a GM is a general power
If a director receives a s303 request - i.e. not less than 5% shareholders require them to call GM - when must directors call GM and when must this be held?
Call = say it is going to happen
Held = actually host it
Call GM within 21 days from date they become subject to s303 request which should be held no longer than 28 days after date of notice calling the GM
I.e. subject to S303 > call GM within 21 days > hold no more than 28 days after calling
What happens if directors fail to call GM after receiving s303 within the 21 day period?
I.e. 21 day period to call GM passes
All shareholders who submitted s303 request/any representing more than half of voting rights of those who submitted can call GM themselves on normal notice (14 days) - recovering reasonable expenses for doing so from company