Shareholders Flashcards
Can SHs manage a corporation?
Generally, NO! (the BOD manages the corporation) EXCEPTION: SHs CAN manage the business directly in a “close corporation”
What is a “close corporation”?
A corporation w/ “FEW” SHs The stk is NOT publicly traded
Do you NEED to have SH management in a close corporation?
NO! You do not HAVE to have SH mgmt; you CAN have a BOD BUT, if you want to have SH mgmt, you need 4 things… 1) a prvn in the certificate restricting or transferring bd pwr to SHs (or others); 2) ALL incorporators or SHs (voting AND nonvoting) must approve the certificate; 3) ALL subsequent SHs have notice of the special certificate; AND 4) share are NOT listed on an exchange or regularly quoted OTC dealer
In a close corporation run by SHs, who owes the duties of care AND loyalty?
The managing SHs owe the duties of CARE and LOYALTY to the corporation
In a close corporation, what duties are owed to the minority SHs?
Fid duties are imposed on SHs dealing w/ EA. OTHER: cntrling SHs cannot use their pwr… for PERSONAL GAIN at the expense of the minority SHs or the corporation; OR
to OPPRESS minority SHs or the corporation They owe a duty of UTMOST good faith Policy: cts want to give minority SHs a remedy for behavior that "defeats reasonable expectations for investing"
What is a professional service corporation?
Members of a LICENSED profession (doctors or lawyers) CANNOT practice the prof’n thru a general business corp→they form a professional service corporation Abbreviated “P.C.”
Certificate MUST meet the general corporation reqs of the BCL: must also indicate the profession to be practiced AND the names/addys of original SHs, directors or officers SHs, officers AND directors MUST be licensed, but can hire non-profs as employees (certification of status MUST BE in the certificate) If a SH dies or is disqualified→ the P.C. MUST buy the stock Each profn'l is resp for his OWN malpractice, BUT not that of the others (thus, better than a partnership) Profn'ls are NOT resp for Ks entered into by the entity in its OWN name
What 2 ways can SHs “pierce the corporate veil”?
REMEMBER: general rule is that SHs are NOT liable for what the corp does; BUT in a CLOSE corporation, SHs can be PERSONALLY liable if (i) they abuse the privilege of incorporation; AND (ii) fairness reqs holding them liable (to prevent fraud) [ALWAYS STATE THE ABOVE RULE FIRST] Two fact patterns… 1) Alter ego: the SHs exercises COMPLETE domination over the company “to perpetrate fraud or injustice” to the πs Commingling personal and corporate funds
Use of corp assets for personal use NOTE: the "SH" can be another corp entity 2) Undercapitalization: SH failed to INVEST ENOUGH to cover prospective liabilities NOTE: undercapitalization ALONE is NOT enough to PCV in NY→ you'd ALSO need complete domination ORfraud/injsutice NOTE: PCV is more likely to be in TORT vs. K
In a close corporation, what are the Top 10 SHs personally liable for?
TOP 10 SHs are personal liable for wages AND benefits of the company’s emps
What is a SH derivative suit?
When a SH is suing to enforce the CORPORATION’S claim (NOT her own personal claim) Always ask: “could the CORPORATION have brought this suit?”; If YES→ it’s a derivative suit
Normally for breaches of fid. duties owed to the corp (care/loyalty)
What is a “direct suit”?
When a SH is suing for a PERSONAL claim (NOT one on behalf of the corporation, derviative)
What happens if a SH wins OR loses a derivative suit?
SH wins: 1) Corp gets money If recovery by the corporation would return the money to the violators, then maybe SH gets award (e.g. in a close corporation)
2) Suing SH gets atty’s fees SH loses: 1) SH cannot recover costs & expenses 2) SH probably liable to the Corp for its costs 3) SHs CANNOT sue the same ∆s on the same trxn (i.e. res judicata)
What are the 6 reqs for a proper SH derivative suit?
1) Stock ownership when claim AROSE until JUDGMENT (or gotten it by operation of law from someone who did, like inheritance or divorce decree) 2) SH must adequately rep the interests of the corp AND the SHs 3) SH can be req’d to post a BOND for ∆’s costs NOT req’d if she owns ≥5% of the stock OR her stock is worth more than $50k
4) SH must make a DEMAND on directors that the corporation sue NOT req'd if doing so would be FUTILE... Maj of BOD is interested (or under cntrl of interested dirs) The BOD violated duty of care The trxn was SO egregious on its face that it COULDN'T have been based on sound jdmt If bd REFUSES after demand, SH could sue ONLY IF... Maj of BOD is interested; OR The PROCEDURE was incomplete/inadequate (e.g. didn't use a special litigation committee, SLC) 5) SH must plead w/ "PARTICULARITY her effors to get the BOD to sue or why it was FUTILE to do so" 6) The CORPORATION must be joined in the litigation AS A ∆(!!!)
What 2 factors do a ct consider when deciding to dismiss a derivative suit (based on SLC motion)?
1) The INDEPENDENCEof the those making the investigation 2) Sufficiency of the INVESTIGATION If these two things are OK, the ct WILL dismiss
Can parties DISMISS or SETTLE a derivative suit?
Yes, but ONLY with ct approval
Can a director OR officer ever bring a derivative suit?
A director or officer CAN sue another director or officer to compel her to ACCOUNT for violation of dutiesOR MISSAPPROPRIATION fo corp assets The suing director or officer does NOT have to meet the reqs for bringing a SH derivative suit
The director or officer sues in OWN name, but recovery goes to the CORP