Shareholders Flashcards
SHAREHOLDER MANAGEMENT OF CORPORATION
Can SHs manage a corporation?
Generally, NO!
the BOD manages the corporation
EXCEPTION: SHs CAN manage the business directly in a “close corporation”
CLOSE CORPORATION
What is a “close corporation”?
Close Corporation =
(i) A corporation w/ “FEW” SHs; AND
(ii) The stk is NOT publicly traded
5 REQUIREMENTS IF CORPORATION CHOOSES TO HAVE SHAREHOLDER MNGMT
Do you NEED to have SH management in a close corporation?
You do not HAVE to have SH mgmt; you CAN have a BOD
BUT, if you want to have SH mgmt, you need 4 things…
1) a prvn in the certificate restricting or transferring bd pwr to SHs (or others);
2) ALL incorporators OR SHs (voting AND nonvoting) must approve the certificate;
3) ALL subsequent SHs have notice of the special certificate; AND
4) share are NOT listed on an exchange or regularly quoted OTC dealer
WHO IS OWED A DUTY IN CLOSE CORPS
In a close corporation run by SHs, who owes the duties of care AND loyalty?
The managing SHs owe the duties of CARE and LOYALTY to the corporation
DUTIES OWED TO MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS IN CLOSE CORP
In a close corporation, what duties are owed to the minority SHs?
In close corporations FIDUCIARY DUTIES are imposed on SHAREHOLDERS in their dealing w/ EACH OTHER:
CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS cannot use their pwr…
(i) for PERSONAL GAIN at the expense of the minority SHs or the corporation; OR
(ii) to OPPRESS minority SHs or the corporation
CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS owe a duty of UTMOST good faith
Policy: Courts want to give minority SHs a remedy for behavior that “defeats their reasonable expectations for investing”
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
What is a professional service corporation?
Professional Service Corporations:
Members of a LICENSED profession (doctors or lawyers) CANNOT practice the the profession through a general business corporation→ INSTEAD they form a professional service corporation
Abbreviated “P.C.”
Certificate MUST meet the general corporation reqs of the BCL: must also indicate the profession to be practiced AND the names/addys of original SHs, directors or officers
SHs, officers AND directors MUST be licensed, but can hire non-profs as employees (certification of status MUST BE in the certificate)
If a SH dies or is disqualified→ the P.C. MUST buy their stock
MALPRACTICE: Each professional is resp for his OWN malpractice, BUT not that of the others (thus, better than a partnership)
CONTRACT LIABILITY: Each professional is NOT resp for Ks entered into by the entity in its OWN name → the ENTITY will be liable
PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL (PCV)
What 2 ways can SHs “pierce the corporate veil”?
REMEMBER: general rule is that SHs are NOT liable for what the corp does;
BUT in a CLOSE corporation, SHs can be PERSONALLY liable if:
(i) they abuse the privilege of incorporating; AND
(ii) fairness requires holding them liable (to prevent fraud)
FAIRNESS will require PCV IF:
(i) The shareholder exercises COMPLETE DOMINION and CONTROL over the corp; AND
(ii) the exercise of dominion is done to perpetuate FRAUD or INJUSTICE
[ALWAYS STATE THE ABOVE RULE FIRST]
Note: If close corp and one shareholder commits the fraud or injustice and the other does NOTHING wrong, the bad shareholder only will be held liable
Two common fact patterns…
1) ALTER EGO:
the SHs exercises COMPLETE domination over the company “to perpetrate fraud or injustice” to the πs: (i) Commingling personal and corporate funds; and
(ii) Use of corp assets for personal use
NOTE: the “SH” can be another corp entity – e.g. A corporation forming a subsidiary to avoid its obligations and totally controls the subsidiary
2) UNDERCAPITALIZATION: SH failed to INVEST ENOUGH to cover prospective liabilities
NOTE: undercapitalization ALONE is NOT enough to PCV in NY→ you’d ALSO need complete domination ORfraud/injsutice
NOTE: PCV is more likely to be in TORT vs. K
LIABILITY OF TOP 10 SHAREHOLDERS OF A CLOSE CORPORATION
In a close corporation, what are the Top 10 SHs personally liable for?
In a close corporation, the Top 10 SHs ARE personally liable for WAGES AND BENEFITS of the COMPANY’s EMPLOYEES
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE SUIT
What is a SH derivative suit?
***HIGHLY TESTED MATERIAL
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE SUIT = When a SH is suing to enforce the CORPORATION’S claim (NOT her own personal claim)
Always ask: “could the CORPORATION have brought this suit?”; If YES→ it’s a derivative suit
Normally brought for breaches of fid. duties owed to the corp (care/loyalty)
DIRECT SUIT
What is a “direct suit”?
DIRECT SUIT= When a SH is suing for a PERSONAL claim (NOT one on behalf of the corporation, derviative)
Seeking declaration of a dividend is probably direct b/c SH seeking to put money in her OWN pockets
EFFECT of WINNING OR LOSING A DERIVATIVE SUIT
What happens if a SH wins OR loses a derivative suit?
***HIGHLY TESTED MATERIAL
IF SH WINS
1) CORP GETS MONEY
If recovery by the corporation would return the money to the violators, then maybe SH gets award – e.g. in a close corporation where A commits the wrong and B and C shareholders ONLY recover so that A doesn’t get back 1/3 of the recovery
2) SUING SH GETS ATTY FEES
IF SH LOSES
1) SH CANNOT RECOVER COSTS AND EXPENSES
2) SH PROBABLY LIABLE TO CORP FOR ITS COSTS
3) NO OTHER SHs CAN sue the SAME ∆s on the same trxn (i.e. res judicata)
6 REQUIREMENTS FOR A PROPER DERIVATIVE SUIT
What are the 6 reqs for a proper SH derivative suit?
***HIGHLY TESTED MATERIAL
The 6 requirements for bringing a shareholder derivative suit =
1) Stock ownership WHEN CLAIM AROSE AND UNTIL JUDGMENT (or gotten it by operation of law from someone who did, like inheritance or divorce decree)
2) SH must adequately rep the interests of the corp AND the SHs
3) SH can be req’d to post a BOND for ∆’s costs–BUT NOT req’d if she owns ≥5% of the stock OR her stock is worth more than $50k
4) SH must make a DEMAND on directors that the corporation sue—BUT NOT req’d if doing so would be FUTILE…
FUTILE IF:
(i) Maj of BOD is interested (or under cntrl of interested dirs)
(ii) The BOD violated a duty of care
(iii) The trxn was SO egregious on its face that it COULDN’T have been based on sound jdmt
NOTE: If bd REFUSES after demand, SH could sue ONLY IF…
(i) Maj of BOD is interested; OR
(ii) The PROCEDURE was incomplete/inadequate (e.g. didn’t use a special litigation committee, SLC)
5) SH must plead w/ “PARTICULARITY her efforts to get the BOD to sue or why it was FUTILE to do so”
6) The CORPORATION must be joined in the litigation AS A ∆(!!!)
What 2 factors do a ct consider when deciding to dismiss a derivative suit (based on SLC motion)?
***HIGHLY TESTED MATERIAL
IF S makes the demand and the board refuses to have the corporation sue, S will be able to bring the derivative suit anyway IF she can show:
1) The LACK OF INDEPENDENCEof the those making the investigation
2) The INSUFFICIENCY of the INVESTIGATION
If these two things are NOT PRESENT, the ct WILL dismiss
Can parties DISMISS or SETTLE a derivative suit?
***HIGHLY TESTED MATERIAL
Yes, Parties can DISMISS or SETTLE a derivative suit
BUT ONLY with ct approval
DERIVATIVE SUIT BY DIRECTOR OR OFFICER
Can a director OR officer ever bring a derivative suit?
***HIGHLY TESTED MATERIAL
A director or officer CAN sue another director or officer to compel her to ACCOUNT for violation of dutiesOR MISAPPROPRIATION of corp assets
The suing director or officer does NOT have to meet the reqs for bringing a SH derivative suit
The director or officer sues in OWN name, but recovery goes to the CORP