Shareholders Flashcards
Can SHs manage a corporation?
Generally, NO! (the BOD manages the corporation)
EXCEPTION: SHs CAN manage the business directly in a “close corporation”
What is a “close corporation”?
Corporation w/ “FEW” SHs
Stk is NOT publicly traded
Do you NEED to have SH management in a close corporation?
NO!
You do not HAVE to have SH mgmt; you CAN have a BOD
BUT, if you want to have SH mgmt, you need 4 things…
1) Prvn in certificate restricting or transferring bd pwr to SHs (or others);
2) ALL incorporators or SHs (voting AND nonvoting) must approve the certificate;
3) ALL subsequent SHs have notice of the special certificate; AND
4) Share are NOT listed on an exchange or regularly quoted OTC dealer
In a close corporation run by SHs, who owes the duties of care AND loyalty?
Mmanaging SHs owe the duties of CARE and LOYALTY to the corporation
In a close corporation, what duties are owed to the minority SHs?
Fid duties are imposed on SHs dealing w/ EA.
OTHER:
(1) Cntrling SHs cannot use their pwr… for PERSONAL GAIN at the expense of the minority SHs or the corporation; OR to OPPRESS minority SHs or the corporation
(2) Duty of UTMOST good faith
Policy: cts want to give minority SHs a remedy for behavior that “defeats reasonable expectations for investing”
What is a professional service corporation?
Corp for members of a LICENSED profession (doctors or lawyers)
Abbreviated “P.C.”
Certificate MUST meet the general corporation reqs of the BCL:
ALSO:
(i) indicate profession to be practiced AND
(ii) names/addys of original SHs, directors or officers
SHs, officers AND directors MUST be licensed, but can hire non-profs as employees (certification of status MUST BE in the certificate)
If a SH dies or is disqualified→ the P.C. MUST buy the stock
Each profn’l is resp for his OWN malpractice, BUT not that of the others (thus, better than a partnership)
Profn’ls are NOT resp for Ks entered into by the entity in its OWN name
What 2 ways can SHs “pierce the corporate veil”?
General rule - SHs are NOT liable for what the corp does
BUT in a CLOSE corporation, SHs can be PERSONALLY liable if
(i) they abuse the privilege of incorporation; AND
(ii) fairness reqs holding them liable (to prevent fraud)
[ALWAYS STATE THE ABOVE RULE FIRST] Two fact patterns…
1) Alter ego:
SHs exercises COMPLETE domination over the company “to perpetrate fraud or injustice” to the πs
Commingling personal and corporate funds Use of corp assets for personal use
NOTE: the “SH” can be another corp entity
2) Undercapitalization:
SH failed to INVEST ENOUGH to cover prospective liabilities
NOTE: undercapitalization ALONE is NOT enough to PCV in NY→ you’d ALSO need complete domination ORfraud/injustice
NOTE: PCV is more likely to be in TORT vs. K
In a close corporation, what are the Top 10 SHs personally liable for?
TOP 10 SHs are personal liable for wages AND benefits of the company’s emps
What is a SH derivative suit?
When a SH is suing to enforce the CORPORATION’S claim (NOT her own personal claim)
Always ask: “Could the CORPORATION have brought this suit?”
YES?→ it’s a derivative suit
Normally for breaches of fid. duties owed to the corp (care/loyalty)
What is a “direct suit”?
When a SH is suing for a PERSONAL claim (NOT one on behalf of the corporation, derivative)
What happens if a SH wins OR loses a derivative suit?
1) Corp gets money
If recovery by the corporation would return the money to the violators, then maybe SH gets award (e.g. in a close corporation)
2) Suing SH gets atty’s fees
SH loses:
a) SH cannot recover costs & expenses
b) SH probably liable to the Corp for its costs
c) SHs CANNOT sue the same ∆s on the same trxn (i.e. res judicata)
What are the 6 reqs for a proper SH derivative suit?
1) Stock ownership when claim AROSE until JUDGMENT (or gotten it by operation of law from someone who did, like inheritance or divorce decree)
2) SH must adequately rep the interests of the corp AND the SHs
3) SH can be req’d to post a BOND for ∆’s costs NOT req’d if she owns ≥5% of the stock OR her stock is worth more than $50k
4) SH must make a DEMAND on directors that the corporation sue
NOT req’d if doing so would be FUTILE…
(i) Maj of BOD is interested (or under cntrl of interested dirs)
(ii) BOD violated duty of care
The trxn was SO egregious on its face that it COULDN’T have been based on sound jdmt
If bd REFUSES after demand, SH could sue ONLY IF… (a) Maj of BOD is interested; OR (b) PROCEDURE was incomplete/inadequate (e.g. didn’t use a special litigation committee, SLC)
5) SH must plead w/ “PARTICULARITY her efforts to get the BOD to sue or why it was FUTILE to do so”
6) The CORPORATION must be joined in the litigation AS A ∆(!!!)
What 2 factors do a ct consider when deciding to dismiss a derivative suit (based on SLC motion)?
1) The INDEPENDENCEof the those making the investigation
2) Sufficiency of the INVESTIGATION
If these two things are OK, the ct WILL dismiss
Can parties DISMISS or SETTLE a derivative suit?
Yes, but ONLY with ct approval
Can a director OR officer ever bring a derivative suit?
CAN sue another director or officer to compel her to ACCOUNT for violation of dutiesOR MISAPPROPRIATION of corp assets
Suing director or officer does NOT have to meet the reqs for bringing a SH derivative suit
Director or officer sues in OWN name, but recovery goes to the CORP