Shaffer’s Stages Of Attachment Flashcards
What is Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) study?
- Glasgow babies from majority WC families
- Mother asked to keep a diary
- researcher visited in their own homes asked them about everyday separation
- they identified 4 distinct stages in the development of infant attachment behaviour
Schaffer and Emerson’s first stage of attachment
Asocial stage
- treats inanimate objects and humans fairly similarly
- not completely asocial as babies tend to show preference to familiar people
- at this stage baby is forming bonds
Schaffer and Emerson’s second stage of attachment
Indiscriminate attachment
- from 2-7 months
- clear preference of humans over inanimate object’s
- accept cuddles and comfort from anyone
- show no separation anxiety or stranger anxiety
Schaffer and Emerson’s third stage of attachment
Specific attachment
- from around 7 months
- display signs of attachment to one particular person
- experience stranger anxiety and separation anxiety
- forms an attachment with a primary attachment figure
Schaffer and Emerson’s fourth stage of attachment
Multiple attachment
- extend attachment behaviour to multiple attachments
- these relationships are called secondary attachments
- by age 1 majority of babies had developed multiple attachments
Criticisms of Schaffer and Emerson’s research
(W/ counterpoint)
- lacks population validity
- sample consisted of 60 WC mothers and babies from Glasgow who may form different attachment compared to infants from other countries of wealthier families
- can’t generalise the results
- high external validity, as they were in a natural environment and can generalise to children with similar demographics
Criticism of Schaffer and Emerson’s research
- possibility of social desirability bias
- they interviewed the mother who may not have been truthful/ accurate in order to appear like ‘better’ mothers
- this would reduce the internal validity since natural behaviour was not recorded
Problem with Schaffer and Emerson’s theory of the stages of attachment (w/ counterargument)
- asocial stage is difficult to study
- e.g babies have poor co-ordination and pretty immobile
- Therefore difficult to make judgement about their behaviour
- observations cannot be relied on
- however it has lead to real life applications in day care
Weakness of Schaffer and Emerson’s theory
- conflicting evidence from different t cultures on multiple attachments
- not clear when multiple attachments happen
- e.g when multiple caregivers are the norm, multiple attachments may be form the outset
- their theory can be criticised as being ethnocentric
What year was Schaffer and Emersons study done?
1964
Schaffer and Emerson attachment conclusion?
attachments were most likely to form with those who responded accurately to the babies signals, not the person they spent the most time with.
What is sensitive responsiveness?
The ability to perceive and interpret a child’s signals and communications accurately, and respond to them appropriately and promptly.