Shaffer’s Stages Of Attachment Flashcards
What is Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) study?
- Glasgow babies from majority WC families
- Mother asked to keep a diary
- researcher visited in their own homes asked them about everyday separation
- they identified 4 distinct stages in the development of infant attachment behaviour
Schaffer and Emerson’s first stage of attachment
Asocial stage
- treats inanimate objects and humans fairly similarly
- not completely asocial as babies tend to show preference to familiar people
- at this stage baby is forming bonds
Schaffer and Emerson’s second stage of attachment
Indiscriminate attachment
- from 2-7 months
- clear preference of humans over inanimate object’s
- accept cuddles and comfort from anyone
- show no separation anxiety or stranger anxiety
Schaffer and Emerson’s third stage of attachment
Specific attachment
- from around 7 months
- display signs of attachment to one particular person
- experience stranger anxiety and separation anxiety
- forms an attachment with a primary attachment figure
Schaffer and Emerson’s third stage of attachment
Specific attachment
- from around 7 months
- display signs of attachment to one particular person
- experience stranger anxiety and separation anxiety
- forms an attachment with a primary attachment figure
Schaffer and Emerson’s fourth stage of attachment
Multiple attachment
- extend attachment behaviour to multiple attachments
- these relationships are called secondary attachments
- by age 1 majority of babies had developed multiple attachments
Criticisms of Schaffer and Emerson’s research
(W/ counterpoint)
- lacks population validity
- sample consisted of 60 WC mothers and babies from Glasgow who may form different attachment compared to infants from other countries of wealthier families
- can’t generalise the results
- high external validity, as they were in a natural environment and can generalise to children with similar demographics
Criticism of Schaffer and Emerson’s research
- possibility of social desirability bias
- they interviewed the mother who may not have been truthful/ accurate in order to appear like ‘better’ mothers
- this would reduce the internal validity since natural behaviour was not recorded
Problem with Schaffer and Emerson’s theory of the stages of attachment (w/ counterargument)
- asocial stage is difficult to study
- e.g babies have poor co-ordination and pretty immobile
- Therefore difficult to make judgement about their behaviour
- observations cannot be relied on
- however it has lead to real life applications in day care
Weakness of Schaffer and Emerson’s theory
- conflicting evidence from different t cultures on multiple attachments
- not clear when multiple attachments happen
- e.g when multiple caregivers are the norm, multiple attachments may be form the outset
- their theory can be criticised as being ethnocentric