SGS 25 (Insolvency Transactions) Flashcards
Give an example of a situation in which a floating charge would be void?
An existing unsecured creditor is granted a floating charge by an insolvent company within the relevant time whereby the charge purports to secure the repayment of EXISTING monies owed to that creditor.
What is the meaning of insolvent liquidation / administration in wrongful trading?
= time when assets are insufficient for payment of debts and other liabilities and expenses of winding up / administration
ss.214(6) / 246ZB(6).
Both = balance sheet test (s.123(3)).
What must a liquidator or administrator prove under a wrongful trading claim?
Some time before commencement of winding up
director knew or ought to have concluded
that there was no real prospect the company would avoid going into insolvent liquidation / administration.
What does the reasonably diligent person test apply to?
‘Director knew or ought to have concluded’ s.214(2)(b)
Every step defence (s.214(3)).
What is the reasonably diligent test?
s.214(4)
Objective
Subjective
apply higher of two standards (e.g. if a finance director better able to understand financial position and direction of company and recognise point when insolvent liq / admin is unavoidable.)
What does ‘every’ step mean?
Examples?
every reasonable step.
Call BMs and voice concerns
Suggest savings
Request steps to avoid incurring further debt
Suggest advice of IP, lawyer, independent financial adviser.
What does s.1157 NOT apply to?
Wrongful trading.
Resignation in the context of wrongful trading?
Does not help a director escape liability - may be appropriate if other directors persistently ignore concerned director’s concerns.
Basis of sanction for wrongful trading?
additional depletion of assets caused by director’s conduct from point of no return until date company went into liquidation.
Preference?
If company went into liquidation or administration, the L or A’or could apply to the court for an order to set aside payment as a preference.
Relevant time?
calculated backwards from onset of insolvency = commencement of administration or liquidation procedure (s.240(3)).
Insolvency for voidable transactions?
cash flow or balance sheet basis.
Third limb of requirement for preference?
Company influenced by a ‘desire to prefer’ = Re MC Bacon = desire rather than intention. Subjective test.
Response to genuine commercial pressure will not suffice.
Burden of proof shift for preference?
Undervalue?
Desire presumed where preference given to connected person (s.239(6)).
Insolvency presumed where person is connected (s.240(2)).
Grounds for avoidance of floating charge?
created within relevant time
company insolvent (if granted to a person that is not connected nor an associate).
Given to secure past indebtedness.