Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection Flashcards
Section
Section 128(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961
Penalty
20 years
Ingredients
1) A person
2) Has Sexual Connection
3) With another person
A person
Name the three things
- Gender neutral
- Proven by judicial notice or
- Circumstantial evidence
Unlawful sexual connections Section 128(3), Crimes Act 1961
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B is Person A has sexual connection with person B-
a) without person B’s consent to the connection AND
b) Without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection
Sexual connection
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
a) Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of
i) a part of the body of another person, or
ii) an object held or manipulated by another person, or
b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and part of another person’s genitalia or anus, or
c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph a) or b)
Are introduction and penetration the same thing?
Yes
What degree of introduction must be effected to constitute connection?
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect connection
What three things can be used as proof of penetration:
a) CCTV footage
b) Witness accounts
c) Medical examination (DNA , injuries)
d) Offenders admissions
e) The complainants evidence
c) d) and e)
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organ, interior and exterior…they include the Vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
R v Koroheke
Genitalia
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (weather the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
Consent must by full, voluntary and informed…freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form rational judgment.
R v Cox
Name the matters that dont constitute consent
Matters that don’t constitute consent
- Not protesting or offering physical resistance to use of force.
- Application of force to self or other, threats of force o self or other, or fear of force to self or other.
- Asleep or unconscious
- So affected by drug/alcohol they cannot consent.
- So affected by mental or physical impairment they cannot consent
- Mistaken ID
- Mistaken as to the nature and quality of the act
Reasonable Grounds:
What was the complainant thinking at the time? Was s/h consenting?
Subjective test- step 1
Absence of consent
Reasonable Grounds
if S/he were not consenting did the offender believe the complainant was consenting? What was the offender thinking at the time.
Subjective test-step2
Belief in consent