Sexual Violation Flashcards
What is the definition and two classes of sexual violation?
non-consensual sexual connection
- sexual violation by rape
- sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection
Definition of rape (generally)?
sexual violation that involved the non-consensual penetration of the complainants genitalia by the offenders penis
Definition of unlawful sexual connection (generally)?
any form of non-consensual penetration or oral connection with a persons genitalia or anus
In all cases of sexual violation what must the Crown prove?
- there was an intentional act by the offender involving a sexual connection with the complainant
- the complainant did not consent to the sexual act
- the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting
- if the offender did believe they were consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable.
What does s128(4) make clear?
A spouse who sexually violates their spouse has no legal defense due to the fact that the couple ore legally married.
Definition of sexual connection?
Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purpose, of -
a) a part of the body of another person, or
b) an object held or manipulated by another person.
How can proof of penetration be established?
- the complainants evidence-
medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA - the defendants admissions.
Definition of genetalia as per section 2 of the CA 61?
includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genetalia
R v Koroheke (genitalia)
The genetalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior … they include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
Definiton of penis as per section 2 of the CA 1961?
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis.
Section 127 CA 1961?
No presumption because of age.
There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age. Therefore it is not a defense to say that either of the parties was too young or too old to have sex.
Consent subjective/objective test?
The crown must prove that:
- the complainant did not consent to the sexual act
- the offender did not believe that complainant was consenting
- if they did, the grounds for such a belief were unreasonable
Definition of consent
A persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
Must be real, genuine, true, and may be conveyed by words or conduct or both.
R v Cox
Consent must be full voluntary free and informed … freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting”