sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour Flashcards
what does anisogamy refer to?
the differences between male and female gametes
what are some differences between male and female gametes?
- sperm= small, mobile and continuously produced from puberty to old age
- ova= larger, static and produced at intervals for a limited number of years
explain how anisogamy is thought to impact on human reproductive behaviour
the consequences of anisogamy are that there are plenty of fertile males but fewer famles and this gives rise to different mating strategies
inter-sexual selection is the preferred strategy of the female- quantity over quality. Explain how
- inter-sexual selection is the selection of mates between sexes e.g. females selecting or males selecting females
- the female makes greater investment of time, commitment and other resources, before, during and after the birth of her offspring = more crucial females are more choosy in term of a mate’s reproductive fitness than it is for males
- both sexes are choosy to some extent about their partner but the consequences of making a poor choice of partner are most serious for the female= pays for her to be especially choosy in terms of inter-sexual selection= females seek a mate that will not only provide healthy offspring but who will support them with resources
how do inter-sexual selection factors impact on human reproductive behaviour?
- the preferences of both sexes determines which attributes are passed on
- for example, if height is a genuine marker of fitness in males, the females who choose the tallest males will have greater reproductive success
- their innate preference for tallness is passed onto their daughters who also choose taller men and are more reproductively successful
- over time this leads to taller and taller men being selected
= RUNAWAY PROCESSS
intra-sexual selection is the preferred strategy of the male- quantity over quality. Explain how
- intra-sexual competiton involves males competing with other males
- they have to compete because females are a limited resource and are choosy
- the males who compete successfully are able to pass on their genes to the next generation and therefore those traits that led to their success are perpetuated
intra-sexual selection pressures lead to certain patterns of human reproductive behaviour :
1- male aggression: males who act aggressively may be more likely to succeed in mating as they are more likely to win a competition with another male
2- male preference for youthful and fertile women since such characteristics are a better guarantee of reproductive success= the genes of those males with such innate preferences are more likely to be represented in the next generation= successful reproduction strategy
3- male desire to optimise mating chances by fertilising as many females as possible also ensures the passage of such preference genes to the next generation
what are the evaluation points for sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour?
- support for relationship between intra-sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour (Buss)
- further support for the relationship between intra-sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour (Clark and Hatfield)
- one limitation is that this relationship ignores social and cultural influences
- support from waist-hip ratio (WHR)preferences of males for females
explain how there is support for relationship between intra-sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour (Buss)
- Buss surveyed over 10,000 adults in 33 countries asking about partner preference
- he found that females placed greater value on resource-related characteristics than males did e.g good financial prospects and ambition whereas males valued reproductive capacity e.g. good looks, chastity and youth
- this supports sex differences due to anisogamy and partner preference derived from sexual selection theory
- what’s more, findings can be applied across many cultures!
explain how there is further support for the relationship between intra-sexual selection and human reproductive behaviour (Clark and Hatfield)
- Clark and Hatfield sent students onto campus to approach other students with the question: “I have noticed you around campus. I find you to be very attractive. Would you go to bed with me tonight?”
- NO FEMALES DID but 75% of males did
- this supports the suggestion that female choosiness is a reality and males have evolved a different strategy to ensure their reproductive success
explain how one limitation is that this relationship ignores social and cultural differences
- partner preferences have impacted over time by changing social norms and cultural practices and have occurred too rapidly to be explained in evolutionary terms
- for example women have a more significant role in most workforces and as such, are less reliant on male resources
- Chang et al report that some preferences have changed and others have remained the same over 25 years in China
- this suggests that both evolutionary and cultural influences must be taken into account when explaining human reproductive behaviour
explain how there is support from waist-hip ratio (WHR) preferences of males for females
- Singh measured WHR preference of males for females
- the findings were that any hip and waist size can be attractive as long as the ratio of one to the other is 0.7- this is thought to signify that the female is fertile but not currently pregnant
- this shows that evolutionary factors are reflected in patterns of human reproductive behaviour through partner preferences