Sexual Offences, Definitions and Case Law Flashcards
Sexual Violation by Rape Definition
“Rape” is a specific form of sexual violation that involves the non-consensual
penetration of the complainant’s genitalia by the offender’s penis, and the offender knows that the complainant is not consenting.
Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection Definition
“Unlawful Sexual Connection” has a wider meaning than rape, and includes any form
of non-consensual penetration or oral connection with a person’s genitalia or anus without the complainants consent, and without the belief from the defendnats that the complainant was consenting.
What must be proved beyond reasonable doubt in all cases of Sexual Violation?
- there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant,
AND - the complainant did not consent to the sexual act,
AND - the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting and acted anyway
OR
- if the offender did believe the complainant was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable and acted anyway
Does being married or being a spouse give any defence to sexual violation?
No, a spouse who sexually violates their spouse has no legal defence due to the fact that the couple are legally married.
Sexual violation punishment and 2 exceptions to the nature of the punishment…
Everyone who commits sexual violation is liable to imprisonment up to 20 years.
A person convicted of sexual violation must be sentenced to imprisonment unless the court thinks:
(a) the particular circumstances of the person convicted; and
(b) the particular circumstances of the offence, including the nature of the conduct constituting it means the offender should not be imprisoned.
Sexual Violation by Rape Section and Elements
Crimes Act 1961, Section 128 (1) (a)
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection Section and Elements
Crimes Act 1961, Section 128 (1) (b)
- A person
- Has unlawful sexual connection
- With another person
Is being married to a person a defence to a sexual violation?
No, one person may be convicted of the sexual violation of another person at a time when they were married to each other.
Sexual
connection
defined under section 2 (Need to know)
Sexual connection means—
The introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind previously described
How much penetration is required to be sufficient?
The extent of penetration is not relevant, any degree of penetration, no
matter how slight or fleeting, is sufficient.
Proving
penetration
Proof of penetration may be established by:
* the complainant’s evidence
* medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
* the defendant’s admissions
Genitalia defined.
The penis and testicles of a male, and the vulva and vagina of a female, also includes surgically constructed or reconstructed genitalia to allow for offences involving trans-gender individuals.
Case Law for Definition of Genitals..
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior and includes the vulva and the labia, and the opening of the Vagina
Penis Definition
The penis forms part of the male genitalia and includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed Penis.
Anus definition
Anus is not included within the definition of genitalia, and therefore non-consensual penile penetration of the anus is not rape.
Genuine medical purposes definition
Some medical procedures involve penetration of a patient’s genitalia or anus by a doctor. Provided this is done for genuine medical purposes, such penetration is excluded from the definition of sexual connection.
however, that if a doctor penetrates a patient on the pretence of medical necessity, when it is actually for sexual gratification, it may amount to sexual violation.
No
presumption
because of age
This provision means that any person of any age is capable, in a legal sense, of being involved in sexual connection.
Therefore it would not be a defence to a sex-related charge to say that either of the parties was too young or too old to have sexual connection
What makes
sexual
connection
unlawful?
The Crown must prove that:
* the complainant did not consent to the sexual act (a subjective test), and
* the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (a subjective
test), or
* if he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable (an objective test).
Consent definition and Case Law (x3)
“Consent” is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
R v Cox
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed, freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational and informed judgment”.
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting”.
R v Koroheke
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable.
For example, submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or co-operate, is not true consent.