Sexual Offences and their elements Flashcards
What type of crime is Rape?
Where is it found?
A statutory crime
s.1(1) SOA 2003
How serious is rape?
What does this mean?
out of the 4 we study
The most serious
You always start with the most serious (if applicable)
Always convict most serious, even if others apply
Where are any clarifications found for rape (3)
What are they on?
79(3) -> ‘penis’ can be any body parts that have been surgically added
s.79(9) -> vagina includes vulva for legal purposes
s.79 (2) -> penetration is a continuing act
Which case adds to the clarification s.79(2)?
R(F) v DPP [2013]
What is the actus reus and mens rea of rape?
AR -> penetrating …
MR -> ‘intentional’ penetration & no reasonable belief as to consent
Circumstance element for rape?
Consequence element?
Absence of consent
None
What type of crime is Assault by penetration?
Where is it found?
statutory
s.2(1) SOA
Any clarifications for assault by penetration? (2)
AR doesn’t involve mouth
‘a part of his body’ can inlcude penis, but you would go for the more serious offence
Actus reus and mens rea of Assault by penetration
AR -> penetrating …
MR -> ‘intentional’ penetration, no reasonable belief as to consent
Circumstance element for assault by penetration?
Consequence element?
Absence of consent & penetration needs to be sexual
None
What type of crime is sexual assault?
Where is it found?
statutory offence
s.3(1)
Any clarifications for sexual assault (3)
Any case law? (3)
s.79(8) -> clarifies touching -> R v H [2005]
s.78 -> sexual
s.78 -> reasonable -> objective standard -> Attorney General’s Reference (No. 1 of 2020) [2020] & R v Ciccarrelli [2011]
Actus reus and mens rea for sexual assault
AR -> conduct element - touching
MR -> ‘intentional’ touching, absence of reasonable belief
Circumstance element for sexual assault
Consequence element?
touching has to be sexual, no consent
None
Which case provides a richer definition of touching under s.78?
Why?
R v Abdulahi [2022]
CoA argued that manner of conduct is what is important
What are the views of Simester and Sullivan of s.78?
Which case has a response to this?
- argues that s.78(a) is very rarely applicable
- but s.78(b) isn’t that helpful because anything could be sexual
depending on what’s going on in people’s minds- but AG [2020] argues that you need to implement common sense
What does s.6 Interpretation Act 1978 state?
- all Acts of Parliament with reference to the masculine gender also include the female gender and vice versa -> unless a contrary intention appears
- we’d include non-binary in this
What type of offence is ‘Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent’?
Where is it found?
Is it new?
Statutory
s.4(1)
Yes, it didn’t exist pre-SOA
What is the actus reus and mens rea of s.4(1)?
AR -> conduct element ‘ causing to engage …’
MR -> ‘intentionally’ causing, no reasonable belief as to consent
Circumstance element for s.4(1)?
is mens rea required for all of these?
Sexual -> no MR required for this element
Absence of consent -> yes, MR required
Why are there 2 levels of seriousness for s.4(1)?
Where are the levels clarified?
Technically 2 different offences -> Depends on whether it is penetrative or not
s.4(4) and s.4(5)
What do you do if there is more than 1 defender?
Each individual defendant must be considered separately in relation to
each individual complaint