Sexual Offences Flashcards
Elements and section - Sexual violation by rape
Section 128(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Elements and section - Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection
Section 128(1)(b) Crimes act 1961
-a person
-has unlawful sexual connection
-with another person
Elements and section - Assault with intent to commit sexual violation
Section 129(2) Crimes 1961
-a person
-assaults
-another person
-with intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
Elements and section - Sexual conduct with a child under 12
Section 132 Crimes Act 1961
-a person
(1) has sexual connection with a child
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with a child
(3) does an indecent act on a child
Elements and section - Sexual conduct with a young person under 16
Section 134 Crimes Act 1961
-a person
(1) has sexual connection with a YP
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with a YP
(3) does an indecent act on a YP
Elements and section - Indecent assault
Section 135 Crimes Act 1961
-a person
-indecently assaults
-another person
What must be proved in all cases of sexual violation
-intent by offender involving sexual connection with the complainant
-the complainant did not consent to sexual act
-the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting OR if they believed complainant was
consent, the grounds for such belief were not reasonable
Define sexual connection
-connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of -
(i) a part of the body of another person; OR
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; OR,
-connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; OR,
-the continuation of connection of a kind described above
Define penetration
introduction to the slightest degree no matter how slight or fleeting
Proof of penetration may be established by..
-the complainant’s evidence
-medical examination, including physical injuries and
DNA evidence
-the defendant’s admissions
Genitalia case law
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior, the include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina
Explain “no presumption because of age” under Section 127
any person of any age is capable, in a legal sense, of being involved in sexual connection.
THEREFORE not a defence to a sex-related charge to say either parties was too young or too old
What must the Crown prove for an unlawful sexual connection
-the complainant did not consent to the sexual act, AND
-the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting, OR
- if they believed complainant was consenting, the grounds for such belief were not reasonable
Define consent and name related case law
consent is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
R v Cox
R v Gutuama
R v Cox
Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed, freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement
Notes on reluctant consent
true consent may be given reluctantly or hesitantly and may be regretted afterwards but if given without fear or application of force or the result of actual or threatened force, then it is true consent
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting
Notes on recklessness as to consent
not consistent with having reasonable belief in consent
What are the six elements to prove in a withdrawn consent case
1 - Person A sexually penetrated person B
2 - Person B did not consent to penetration
3 - Person A knew that Person B was not consenting to penetration
4 - Person A continued with penetration knowing Person B was no longer consenting
5 - Person A did not believe on reasonable grounds that Person B was consenting to the penetration
6 - Person A continued penetration when a reasonable person would not believe Person B was still consenting
Specified non-consent under Section 128A
- lack of physical resistance
- consent under fear, threat or application of force
- asleep or unconscious
- intoxicated to degree unable refuse to consent
- intellectual, mental or physical condition or
impairment to degree unable refuse to consent - mistaken identity of accused
- mistaken about nature and quality
Attempts case law
R v Harpur
The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops, the defendant’s conduct may be considered in its entirety
Define assault
intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to another person, directly or indirectly, or threatening by any act or gesture to apply such force to the person or another, causing the other to believe on reasonable grounds that they have the ability to effect the purpose
Age (CYP) case law
R v Forrest and Forrest
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victim’s age