Sexual Offences Flashcards
What must be proved in all sexual violation cases
Crown must prove beyond reasonable doubt
- Intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant
- Complainant didn’t consent and the offender didn’t believe they were consenting
- If they did believe, the grounds for belief were unreasonable
Legal Defence for spouse
Section and understanding
Section 128(4) a spouse who sexually violates their spouse has no legal defence
Sexual Violation by Rape
Section, Act, Elements
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection
Section, Act, Elements
Section 128(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Has unlawful sexual connection
- With another person
Sexual Violation
Definition
- The act of a person who rapes another person or has unlawful sexual connection with another person
Rape
Definition
- Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis
- Without person B’s consent and without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents
Unlawful Sexual Connection
Definition
- Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B without their consent or without believing on reasonable grounds that they consent
Sexual Connection
Definition
- Connection effected by the introduction of a part of the body, an object or mouth / tongue of another person into the genitalia or anus of one person
Penetration
Definition
- Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proving Penetration
three things
- Can be established by medical examination, complainants evidence or defendants admissions
Genitalia
Definition
- A surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia
R v Koroheke
Genitalia case law
- The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior
No presumption because of age
Section and understanding
Section 127, Crimes Act
- Any person of any age is capable of being involved in sexual connection
Objective / Subjective consent test
Prosecution must prove
- The Complainant did not consent AND the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (subjective)
- If the offender did believe they were consenting, the grounds for such belief were not reasonable (objective)
Consent
Definition
- A person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something proposed or desired by another.
R v Cox
Consent case law
Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.
R v Gutuama
Objective consent case law
The Crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought the complainant was consenting.
Invalid Consent
Section, Act and understanding
Section 128A, Crimes Act 1961
- A person does not consent just because they don’t protest or physically resist
- A person does not consent if they allow activity because of force applied, the threat of force applied or the fear of force
- A person does not consent if activity occurs while they are asleep or unconscious
- A person does not consent if activity occurs while they are so affected by alcohol or drugs that they can’t consent or refuse the activity
- A person does not consent if activity occurs while they are affected by an intellectual, mental or physical condition / impairment
- A person does not consent if activity occurs because of mistaken identity
R v Koroheke
Invalid Consent case law
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable.
To be guilty of an attempt to commit an offence
two things proven
- Intend to commit the offence
- Take a real and substantial step towards achieving that aim