Sexual Offences Flashcards
Sexual Violation by Rape liability
Sexual violation by rape Section 128(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
- a person
- rapes
- another person
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection liability
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection Section 128(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961
- a person
- has unlawful sexual connection
- another person
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation liability
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation Section 129(2) Crimes Act 1961
- a person
- assaults
- another person
- with intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
Sexual conduct with a child under 12 liability
Sexual conduct with a child under 12
Section 132, Crimes Act 1961
- a person
(1) has sexual connection with a child
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with a child
(3) does an indecent act on a child
Sexual conduct with a young person under 16 liability
Sexual conduct with a young person under 16
Section 134 Crimes Act 1961
- a person
(1) Has sexual connection with a young person
(2) Attempts to have sexual connection with a young person
(3) Does an indecent act on a young person
Indecent Assault liability
Indecent Assault
Section 135 Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Indecently Assaults
- Another person
Rapes definition
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis
(1) Without person B’s consent to the connection
AND
(2) Without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection
Penetration definition
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection
Genitalia definition
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex).
Penis definition
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex).
Unlawful sexual connection definition
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B
(1) without person B’s consent to the connection
AND
(2) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Sexual connection defined
(a) Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia OR anus of one person, other than for genuine medical purposes, of:
(i) a part of the body of another person;
OR
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person;
OR
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus
OR
(c) the continuation of the connection described in A or B
What must be proved in all cases of sexual violation
- there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant
AND - the complainant did not consent to the sexual act
AND - the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting
OR - If he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable
Proving penetration
- The complainant’s evidence
- Medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
- The defendant’s admissions
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina
Mouth or Tongue
In the case of oral sexual connection, it is not necessary for there to be penetration; any touching of a person’s genitalia or anus with another person’s mouth or tongue is sufficient.
Continuation defined
Continuation captures situations where sexual activity is commenced consensually, but consent is later withdrawn
Subjective and Objective tests
The crown must prove that:
- The complainant did not consent to the sexual act (subjective test)
- The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (subjective test)
- If he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable (an objective test)
R v Cox
Consent must be full, voluntary, free, and informed. Freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment
Subjective test - absence of consent
Whether or not the complainant was consenting is a subjective test from the complainant’s point of view - ie, what was the complainant thinking at the time?
The Crown must prove that the complainant was not consenting to the sexual act at the time it occurred - it is not for the defendant to prove that she was consenting.
Objective test - reasonable grounds for belief in consent
The objective test is: what would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant.
If a reasonable person would, in the same circumstances, have believed the complainant was consenting, the jury may well acquit the defendant. If a reasonable person would not have believed she was consenting, the jury is more likely to convict.
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test, the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought she was consenting”.
Lack of protest or resistance
A lack of protest or resistance does not mean a person is consenting, even if the lack of consent has not been communicated to the defendant; what is relevant is the complainant’s state of mind.
Force, threat, or fear of force
There is no consent if a person submits to sexual connection because of the actual or threatened application of force to any person, or because of an honestly held fear of force, whether or not that fear was reasonable. The issue is whether the complainant allowed the sexual activity because of it.