Sexual Offence Definitions Flashcards

1
Q

Rape

A

Person a rapes person b if person a has sexual connection with person b effected by penetration of person b genitalia by person a penis without person b consent or without reasonable grounds believe they were consenting to the. Connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

U/L sexual connection

A

Person a has unlawful sexual connection with b if person a has sexual connection with b without their consent and they did not believe in reasonable grounds they were consenting to the connection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sexual connection

A

Introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person (other than genuine medical purpose) of
A part of the body of another person or
An object held or manipulated by another person
Connection between the mouth or toungue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
Or the continuation of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consent

A

Is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to do something desired by another
R v cox - full, voluntary ,free and informed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasonable grounds

A

Subjective - the victim did not consent
Subjective - the defendant did not believe she was consenting
Objectionable- if the defendant believed victim was consenting the grounds for that belief was not reasonable
R v gutuama
Crown must prove no reasonable person in the accused shoes would believe the complainant was consenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circumstance that don’t constitute consent

A

FAAILMM
F- force, threats, violence
A- alcohol or drugs
A - asleep/ unconscious
I- impaired mentally/physically
L- lack of resistance, protest
M- mistaken identity
M - mistaken to quality and nature of act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Indecency

A

R v court - conduct a right thinking person would consider an affront to the sexual modesty of the victim
R v Dunn - indecency must be viewed in light of the time place circumstances. Must be more than trifling and be sufficient to warrant the sanction of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Indecent assault

A

R v Leeson - Is an assault accompanied by circumstances of indecency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dependant family member

A

Power and authority over dependant member
AND
Has responsibility or significant role in upbringing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Incest 10 years imprisonment

A

Sexual connection between
- parent and child
- siblings
- half siblings
- grand parent and grand child
AND
Person knows of the relationship
AND
Over 16 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defence to s131b

A

Taken reasonable steps to find out the person was 16 or over
AND
Believed on reasonable grounds the cyp was 16 or over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Significant impairment

A

Intellectual, physical, mental condition:/ impairment that impairs the capacity to; FUUC

-Forsee the consequences of decisions about sexual conduct or;
-Understand nature of sexual conductor;
-Understand nature of decisions about sexual conduct or;
-Communicate decisions about sexual conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

S138 sexual exploitation of person with significant impairment

A

Sexual connection with impaired person knowing impaired person has significant impairment and has obtained the persons acquiescence by taking advantage of the impairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Acute sexual response victim
Advisement

A

Advise not to
-Eat or drink
-Wash or shower
-Go to toilet
-Wash hands
-Brush teeth
-Smoke
-Change clothes
-Brush or comb hair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Child neglect

A

Intentional neglect / ill treatment causes or permits neglect/ ill treatment.
Likely to cause actual bodily harm, injury to health or mental disorder or disability. Must be serious and avoidable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Child neglect examples

A

Not providing shelter, food, clothes.
Not protecting from physical harm or danger.
Not accessing appropriate medical treatment.
Allowing child to be exposed to illicit drug manufacturing.

17
Q

Child abuse

A

Abusing of any child or young person
Physically. Emotionally. Sexually. Ill treatment. Abuse. Neglect. Deprivation.

18
Q

Sexual connection with a child
/ sexual violation

A

R v cox
Except in rare circumstances full, voluntary, free informed consent not possible from a child of 10 or 11 years old
R v cox no reasonable adult would have grounds to believe a 10 or 11 year old girl would have the experience or maturity to understand the nature and significance of the act.

19
Q

Indecent act

A

Generally accepted as an act accompanied by circumstances of indecency

20
Q

S 134 1,2,3 sexual conduct with a young person under 16
1. Sexual connection
2. Attempted sexual connection
3. Indecent act

A

-Everyone who
-Has sexual connection/ attempts/ does indexnt act
-With/on a young person under 16

21
Q

Evidence act s103 application grounds

A
  • age and maturity of witness
  • trauma suffered by witness
  • fear of intimidation
  • nature of evidence the witness is to give
  • the physical, intellectual, psychological/ psychiatric impairment of the witness
  • if the witness is outside of NZ
22
Q

Alternative ways to give evidence for victim/witness

A

-While in room but unable to see offender or specific person (screens)
-From an appropriate place outside of courtroom(cctv)
- by video recording made prior to the hearing (video recording)

23
Q

Reg 28

A

Prosecutor to give transcript to defence after not Guidry plea

24
Q

Defence to 134

A

Defence must prove
- defendant took reasonable steps to ascertain age as above 16
- defendant believed on reasonable grounds they were 16 or over
- the young person consented

25
Q

R v gutuama

A

Prosecution must prove “no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting”

26
Q

Calmtea

A