Sexual Ethics Flashcards
Intro
Christian views vs secular views on sexual ethics:
The debate between private (liberalism) and public (conservative authoritarianism).
The application of any of the four normative ethical theories to sexual ethics.
The issues of homosexuality, pre-marital sex and extra-marital sex.
The three main Christian approaches to sexual ethics:
Conservative Christianity: Biblical teachings & traditional theologians.
Natural moral law: typically a conservative catholic view.
Liberal Christianity: the bible is not the literal word of God so we need to update Christian ethics for modern times. Fletcher’s situation ethics is an example of this.
Keyword
Pre-marital
- sex before marriage - often linked to promiscuous
- commitiing a grave sin
- Introduction of conraceptive pill has been creditied with large social change around sex - 1960
- the increase in importance placed on virginity was partly religious, partly so male memebers of Bristish aristocracy would ensure their children was correct
- christians viewed sex outside marriage as a sin = lack of displine and threat to marriage and the family
- Jesus’ first miracle at a wedding suggest God’s approval of marraige
- cohabitation is seen as less stable
- ‘‘Human love does not tolerate ‘trial marriages’’‘ - CCC 2391
other views of pre-marital sex
- some christians reject this, and others ‘although still reject casual sex accept premarital sex as a step in the process towards marriage
- In western societies, attitudes and laws do not follow the Church’s teachings = civil marraiges now outnumber relgious ones.
Extramarital sex
- usually described as adulterous sex
- catholic church forbids divorce through annulments and view remarriages as extramarital sex
- catholics view marriage as a sacrement
- Lisa Cahill: ‘sex, gender and christian ethics’ argues that christianity’s opposition to divorce was orignally an attemot to stop men’s ablity to manipulate women for power and wealth, within the marriage
- ban on adultery and divorce stopped men having many wives (limited their role as property) and protected women/children.= why they used laws {marriage is about commitment} - links to Mary Daly religion/society oppresses woman - catholic tried to protect women
homosexuality
- Radical change in legal frameworks around homosexuality
- In the 20th century, homosexuality was still illegal (only between men) = It was considered a mental illness
- Age of consent lowered to 18 in 1994 and 16 in 2001 (same as heterosexual) = the age of consent was higher for gay people (21)
- First same-sex marriage occurred 2014= when it was legalised
- Increased tolerant approach to spectrum of gender identities = children needed to be protected [Equality and human rights]
- Catholic Church blesses it, but do not accept it
keyword
Betrothel
Traditonally the exchange of promises, which in earlier times marked the point at which sex was permitted.
Christianity and homosexuality
- “men who have sex with men” will not inherit the Kingdom of God
1 Corinthians 6 - Sodom and Gommarrah - look in to this
- These acts are usually in the context of adultery/ prostitutes - not exclusive committed relationships
- Pederasty was common (sex between a man and a prepubescent {younger} boy)
- People accept immorality of homosexuality but reject passages that advocate for beheading as punishment
- Procreation cannot happen in same-sex relationships violating natural law
- Scripture is used inconsistently to reinforce prejudices
- Vardy notes Paul’s idea that homosexual acts are against nature (they are impure) seems to contradict Jewish view of impurity
The Anglican Church and homosexuality
- CoE opposes same-sex marriage
- They require gay / lesbian clergy who are in same-sex relationships to remain celibate
-
Gene Robison = an example in the change of Christianity - allowing homosexuality to go into the Christian church = he was the first gay priest in a major Christian denomination.
Thinking questions: - Can homosexuality relationship have ethical validity?
- Does monogamy make sense if one is bisexual?
- Whether a persons God given sexual identity is determined by their physical nature of self-perception = Did God really make them that way
The Catholic Church and homosexuality - Progressive view
Not opposing views to Anglican but an additional point
- Homosexual attraction not a sin but a trial
- All people should be respected and no one should face discrimination
- called to chastity (abstinence)
- “If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?” Pope Francis
methodist
Changing Christian moral thought on homosexuality - Add more
- All being made in the image of God shows our nature is acceptable to God
- some christians churches goes beyond, challenging the traditional disapproval of homosexuality (found in LT. and the Bible) maintaining that the quality of relationships is what determines its value
St Augustine on sexual desire and original sin
- Augustine references Genesis, where after disobeying God Adam and Eve became aware of their nakedness and covered up out of shame.
- Augustine claims it is ‘just’ that we feel shame about our naked bodies, since it is just that we feel shame over having lust because it being beyond our control is the result of our fallen state
- Augustine argues this is universal – people of all cultures cover up their genitals, and sex is done in private, which Augustine suggests is due to the shame associated with it.
- Augustine concludes that sex must be confined to marriage for the purpose of having children.
- This means that homosexual sex is not allowed.
- Anything else is just giving in to original sin in a depraved and disordered way.
liberal
Secular thinking on sexual ethics
J.S. Mill
- Wanted a free liberal society
- Wanted artificial contraception available to the poor (prohibited by the Catholic Church)
- advocates for women’s right, gender equality
- In ‘On Liberity’ = ‘Sex is a principle of perfect quality, admitting no power or privielge on side, nor disability on the other’
- Regulation around marriage/sex rooted in Christianity’s normalisation of monogamous heterosexual marriage as the ideal
- However, there have been changes, e.g. cohabitation is common, women just as easily divorce, children out of wedlock, illegal to discriminate someone based on sexuality / gender
Secular views on sexual ethics
- Freud’s rejection of Christian approaches to sex as overly repressive.
- Freud himself was quite conservative regarding sex in many ways
- He thought that traditional Christian attitudes towards sex resulted in a feeling of shame about sexual desire which led to unhealthy repression and mental illness.
- The liberal secular attitude towards sex is influenced by Freud.
- It claims that sex is a natural biological desire which shouldn’t be a source of shame but of well-being.
- Conservative religious attitudes towards sex are therefore unnecessarily repressive and puritanical.
- Traditionalists always fought against the sexual liberalisation of society, concerned it would harm social order, and yet society seems fine if not better.
Secular thinking on sexual ethics
Natural law = Capabilities approach
- Focusing on the freedom humans need for wellbeing
- Emotional attachment to things and people who love and care - not having fear or anxiety around their attachments
- People should be free to create consensual sexual relationships however they as long as no one is harmed.
Sexual ethics: application
Natural laws
- Natural law implies that masturbation, homo, sex, contraception all wrong
- it is knowing Right and wrong which are absolute and connected to human flourishing
- follows the Primary precepts: protecting life, ensuring reproduction, education and loving God
- Creation of new life is central to the purpose of sex, therefore if it separates it, it is morally questionable
- “marital act must retain its intrinsic relationship to the procreation of human life” Pope Paul VI in Humanae Vitae
- Homosexuals therefore cannot procreation therefore it is wrong
- Contraception is wrong
- sex is mistaken for apparent good
- PSA: be careful of LANGUANGE - NL THEORY MIGHT NOT BE IN FAVOUR I.E. DOUBLE DOCTRINE