Sexual Flashcards
In all cases of Sexual violation what must the crown prove beyond reasonable doubt?
That there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant AND
The complainant did not consent to the act AND
The offender did not believe that the complainant was consenting to the act or If the offender did believe the complainant was consenting the grounds for that belief were not reasonable.
Any investigation must prove either that the offender did not believe the victim was consenting and acted anyway or that he did believe the victim was consenting but the grounds for such beleif were not reasonable
Explain section 128(4) CA61 in respect of spouses and liability
s.128(4) It shall be no defence to a charge under s.128 that the offender and victim were spouses at the time of the act.
Define sexual violation
s.128 1) SV is the act of a person who: a) rapes another person b) has unlawful sexual connection with another person 2) Person A rapes Person B if PA has sexual connection with PB effected by the introduction of PA’s penis into the genitalia of PB a) without PB’s consent AND b) without believing on reasonable grounds that PB consented to the connection. 3) PA has unlawful sexual connection with PB if PA has sexual connection with PB a) without PB’s consent AND b) without believing on reasonable grounds that PB consents.
Discuss sentencing requirements of Sexual Violation
everyone who commits sexual violation is liable for a sentence of imprisonment not exceeding 20 years. A person convicted of sexual violation must be sentenced to imprisonment unless having regard to the matters in sub section 3 the court thinks that the person should not be sentenced to imprisonment: s.128(3) matters are: a) the particular circumstances of the person convicted AND b) the particular circumstances of the offence; the nature of the conduct constituting it.
define sexual connection
Sexual connection s.2 CA61 Sexual connection means: a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person other than for genuine medical purposes of: i) a part of the body of another person OR ii) an object held or manipulated by another person OR b) connection between the mouth and tongue of a person and the genitalia or anus of another person OR c) Any continuation of a connection of a kind described in subsection a or b.
Discuss Introduction and penetration
In practise there is no real difference and it is not necessary to differentiate between the terms. s.2 For the purposes of paragraph a) in subsection 1) of ‘sexual connection’ introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect connection. Penetration of the genitalia or anus must be proved although the extent of the penetration is not relevant, any degree of penetration no matter how slight or fleeting is sufficient.
How can you establish penetration
Complainants evidence Medical examination including DNA and physical injuries Defendants admisions
Define Genitalia
Genitalia s.2 CA61 genitalia includes the surgically constructed and reconstructed organs analogous to any naturally occurring male of female genitalia whether male, female or indeterminate sex.
Define r v KOROHEKE (genitalia)
the genitalia comprise the reproductive organs interior and exterior, they include the vulva the labia interior and exterior at the opening to the vagina.
Define Penis
s.2 CA61 Penis includes any surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to any natural occurring penis whether male, female or indeterminate sex.
Discuss ‘continuation’ R v KAITAMAKI and the obligation on a person to stop sexual activity
R v KAITAMAKI a man broke into a house a raped a woman twice he argued that it was only in the second act of intercourse did he realise she was not consenting and he continued regardless. The court held that once he penetrated the woman and realised she was not consenting but continues the act becomes rape. There is an obligation on a person to stop sexual activity at the point they realise the other person is or may be unwilling failure to do so may render a previously considered consensual activity unlawful.
What must the crown prove in relation to consent? (tests)
Subjective test: victim did not consent to the sexual act AND the offender did not believe the victim was consenting AND Objective test: if he did believe the victim was consenting the grounds for such a belief were unreasonable.
Define R v Cox re consent
R v Cox Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed,freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.
Deine consent
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
Define R v GUTUAMA
Under the objective test the crown must rove that no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
Outline the matters that don’t constitute consent:
A person does not consent to sexual activity:
- because they dont protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.
- they allow the activity because of force applied to him/her or another person, threat (expressed or implied) of the application of force to him/her or another person or fear of the application of force to him/her or another person.
- if they are asleep when the activity occurs.
- If they are so affected by alcohol or some other drugs that they cannot consent to the activity.
- if they are so affected by intelectual, physical or mental condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that they cannot consent or refuse to consent.
- If they allow the activity because they are mistaken as to the other persons identity.
- If they allow the activity because they are mistake as to its nature or quality.
- This section does not limit the circumstances in which a person does not consent to sexual activity.
define r v Koroheke (true consent)
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable. For example submission by a woman becuase she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or co-operate is not true consent.
Define Rape
s.128 (2) PA rapes PB if PA has sexual connection effected by the penetration of PB’s genitalia by PA’s penis a) without PB’s consent AND b) without believing on reasonable ground that PB consents.
What distinguishes Attempted Sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation
There may be some overlap between the two offences but they are distinguished on the basis that; an attempt does not necessarily involve an assault AND An assault may not be sufficiently proximate to the full offence to constitute and attempt.
What is the definition of ‘Intent’ and how can it be proved?
In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intent to commit an offence, firstly an intent to commit an act and secondly an intent to get a specific result. Proved by: The defendants actions and words before, during and after the event The surrounding circumstances The nature of the act itself.
What must the crown prove for the offence of attempted sexual violation?
At the time of the defendants actions they: intended to have sexual connection with the victim. AND The victim did not consent to the intended sexual connection. AND the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the victim consented to the sexual connection intended. Establishing the defendant was reckless as to whether or not the victim was consenting satisfies the requirement that the belief was not reasonable.
Define R v HARPUR in relation to attempts
An attempt includes an act or omission constituting a substantial step in the course of conduct planned to culminate in the commission of the crime. Th court may have regard to the actions of the defendant viewed cumulatively up to the point in which the conduct in questions stops. The defendants conduct may be viewed in its entirety, considering how much remains to be done is always relevant although not determinative.
What are the ingredients of Assault with intent to Commit Sexual Violation?
S.192 CA61 10 years A person Assaults another person With intent to have sexual violation with that person. If the offender is only trying to change the victims mind to consent to having sexual connection that this charge applies.. If the offender is determined to have sexual connection and the assault is only a step in the process to that end then the appropriate charge is Attempted Sexual violation.
When might you charge someone with Assault with intent to commit sexual violation s.192 CA61
when the offender is intent on having sexual connection with the victim and assaults the victim in order to obtain consent to do that. As an alternative to Attempted sexual violation particularly when the proximity between the assault and completion of the offence may be at issue.