Sex Offences Flashcards
Unlawful sexual connection (the definition not the liability)
non-consensual
penetration or oral connection with genitalia or anus
Max penalty for rape/ULSC
20 years
In all cases of sexual violation the crown must prove beyond reasonable doubt
there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant AND
The complainant did not consent AND
The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting OR
If the offender did believe the complainant was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable
Define sexual violation
A person who:
- rapes
- has unlawful sexual connection
Proof of penetration may be established by (3)
- complainants evidence
- medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
- the defendants admissions
R v Koroheke
Definition of genitalia
The genitalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina
Penis includes
surgically constructed organ
True or false:
Anybody with a penis can rape
True. If they have a surgically constructed penis biological gender doesn’t matter
Yes or No
Anus is included within definition of genitalia
No
Reproductive organs only
“Continuation” of act
Where sexual activity is started con sensually but consent is later withdrawn
R v Cox
Definition of consent
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed… freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement
R v Gutuama
objective test for consent
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting”
When is consent relevant?
At the time the act actually took place
Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances.
What section covers this and what are 5 examples?
128A CA 1961
- If she does not protest/ offer physical resistance
- She allows the activity because force was applied
- she was asleep
- she is so affected by alcohol/drugs she cannot consent or refuse
- she is mistaken of the identity
R v Koroheke
Consent
Distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable.
E.g. submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or cooperate is not true consent
Mental impairment:
If the threshold for sexual violation has not been met, but the defendant has taken advantage of the complainant’s vulnerability, what charge should be considered?
s138: sexual exploitation of a person with significant impairment.
section, act and ingredients:
rape
Section 128, 1)a), CA 1961
Any person who
rapes
another person
section, act and ingredients
unlawful sexual connection
Section 128, 1)b) ca 1961
Any person who
has unlawful sexual connection with
another person
Person
Proved by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence
Is age relevant under 128?
no
Define rape
sexual connection by penetration of genitalia by penis
without consent AND without reasonable grounds for consent
Can the offender be penetrated by the victims penis in 128(1)(a)?
No
Can the offender be penetrated by the victims penis in 128(1)(b)?
Yes
What distinguishes between attempted sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation?
- An attempt to commit sexual violation does not necessarily involve an assault
- An assault with intent to commit sexual violation may not be close enough to charge with an attempt (of sexual violation)