Sex Offences Flashcards
Rape
Person A rapes Person B if Person A has sexual connection with Person B effected by the penetration of person B;s genitalia by Person A’s penis
(a) without person B’s consent ot the connection
AND
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that Person B consents to the connection
S128(2) CA 1961
Sexual connection
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person, otherwise for a genuine medical purpose of
(i) a part of the body of another person or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind desfibed in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
S2 CA 1961
Penetration
Introduction and penetration have the same meaning
introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection
S2(1)(a) Ca 1961
proof of penetration
the complainants evidence
medical examination
accused admissions
Genitalia
Genitalia includes any surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogues to a naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex)
S2 CA 1961
Case law related to Genitalia
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior, they include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina
Penis
Penis includes any surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex)
S2 CA 1961
Consent
Consent is a persons concious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
Case law related to consent
R v Cox
Consent must be free, full, voluntary and informed, freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to make a rational judgement
Matters that do not constitute consent
- not protesting or offering physical resistance to use of force
- application, threats or fear of force to self or others
- asleep or unconscious
- so affected by drugs or alcohol they cannot consent
- so affected by mental or physical impairment they cannot consent
- mistaken identity
- mistaken as to nature and quality of act
Reasonable grounds
The establishing of reasonable grounds is a three step process.
Sunbective test - absence of consent
What was the complainant thinking at the time? Was s/he consenting?
Subjective test - Belief in consent
Is s/he was not consenting did the offender believe the complaint was consenting. What was the offender thinking at the time
Objective test - Reasonable grounds to believe in consent
If the offender believed the complainant was consenting, was that belief reasonable in the circumstances. What would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?
Case law relating to Reasonable grounds
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
Person
Gender neutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.
Unlawful sexual connection
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if Person A has sexual connection with Person B
(a) without Person B’s consent to the connection
and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B was consenting to the connection
S128(3) CA 1961
Sexual Connection
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person, other than for some genuine medial purpose
(i) a part of the body of another person or
(ii) any object held or manipulated but another person or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) and (b)
S2 ca 1961