Sex offences Flashcards
In all cases of sexual violation the crown must prove beyond reasonable doubt:
- there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant and
- the complainant did not consent to the sexual act and
- the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting or
- or if the offender did believe the complainant was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable
So any investigation must prove that either:
- the defendant knew they did not have the victims consent but acted anyway (meas rea) or
- the defendants grounds for believing that the victim consented to the act were unreasonable
s128(4) no legal spousal defence
A spouse who sexually violates their spouse has no legal defence due to the fact that the couple are legally married (before 1986, man may have had such a defence)
s128- sexual violation defined
(1)
Sexual violation is the act of a person (gender neutral) who—
(a)
rapes another person; or
(b)
has unlawful sexual connection with another person.
(2)
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,—
(a)
without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b)
without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
(3)
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B—
(a)
without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b)
without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
(4)
One person may be convicted of the sexual violation of another person at a time when they were married to eachother
Important- if person gives consent- it will not be this liability. Look for another suitable one.
s128(b) Sexual violation
(1)
Every one who commits sexual violation is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 20 years.
(2)
A person convicted of sexual violation must be sentenced to imprisonment unless, having regard to the matters stated in subsection (3), the court thinks that the person should not be sentenced to imprisonment.
(3)
The matters are—
(a)
the particular circumstances of the person convicted; and
(b)
the particular circumstances of the offence, including the nature of the conduct constituting it.
Sexual violation may be committed in a number of different ways, each of which carries the same max penalty, but this does not mean that the acts are equally serious. The seriousness of an offence depends on the facts on a particular case
Proof of penetration may be established by:
- complainants evidence
- medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
- the defendants admissions
Objects held/manipulated:
Applies to anything other than part of a body, used by offender to penetrate the complainants genitalia or anus, eg viabrator, deodorant bottle, hand held objects
Genuine medical purposes:
Some medical practices involve penetration of a patients genetalia or anus by a doctor, provided this is done for a genuine medical purpose. such penetration is excluded from definition of sexual connection. Note if it is done on the need of sexual gratification, it may amount to sexual violation.
Oral sexual connection:
Not necessary for penetration, any touching of a persons genitals or anus with another persons mouth or tounge is sufficent.
Continuation of such acts:
Sexual connection starts consensually but consent is later withdrawn. Obligation on person to stop sexual activity at point he realises other person is or may be willing.
s127 No presumption because of age:
There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his/her age. Any person of any age is capable, in a legal sense or being involved in SC. therefore age is not a defence to sex related charge.
What makes sexual connection unlawful? crown must prove:
- the complainant did not consent to the sexual act (subjective test) and
- the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (subjective test)
- if he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such belief were reasonable (objective test)
Reluctant consent:
True consent may be reluctantly or hesitantly and may be regretted afterwards, but if the consent is given even in such a manner, provided it is without fear or the application of force, result of actual or threatened force, the the act of sexual connection would not be rape.
Subjective test: Absence of consent:
Crown must prove that the complainant was not consenting to the sexual act at the time it occurred, Subjective test from complainants point of view eg “what was the complainant thinking at the time”
Subjective test: Belief in consent:
If it is established that the complainant was not consenting, next question is whether or not the defendant believed he/she was consenting at the time. Subjective test from defendants POV. If he/she believed consent was present, an objective test must be applied to determine whether there was a reasonable basis for his/her belief.
Objective test: RG for belief in consent:
Objective test is: what would a reasonable person have believed if place in the same position as the defendant?
Recklessness as to consent:
Reckless as to whether the complainant is consenting or not is not consistent with having a reasonable belief in consent.
When is consent relevant:
Is at the time the act actually took place. Complainants behaviour and attitude before or after the act itself may be relevant. The real point is whether there was true consent, or a reasonably based belief in consent, at the time the act took place.
Matters not constituting consent:
s128A outlines situations where consent may not be valid, eg as a result of fear or force, or is asleep/unconscious, mental incapacity, mistake.
s128A- allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances
(1) A person does not consent to sexual activity just because he or she does not protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.
(2)
A person does not consent to sexual activity if he or she allows the activity because of—
(a)
force applied to him or her or some other person; or
(b)
the threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person; or
(c)
the fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person.
(3)
A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is asleep or unconscious.
(4)
A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
(5)
A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
(6)
One person does not consent to sexual activity with another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistaken about who the other person is.
(7)
A person does not consent to an act of sexual activity if he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its nature and quality.
(8)
This section does not limit the circumstances in which a person does not consent to sexual activity.
(9)
For the purposes of this section,—
allows includes acquiesces in, submits to, participates in, and undertakes
sexual activity, in relation to a person, means—
(a)
sexual connection with the person; or
(b)
the doing on the person of an indecent act that, without the person’s consent, would be an indecent assault of the person.
Lack of protest or resistance (consent):
Lack of protest or resistance does not mean person is consenting, even if lack of consent has not been communicated to the defendant. What is relevant is complainants state of mind.
Force, threat, or fear of force.
Force: allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent to SC if some degree of force has been used to obtain compliance.
Threat: Threat must be threat to use force against the victim or some other person.
Fear: the victim must be afraid that force will be used against them or another person, even if the force was not actually used or threatened.
Asleep of conscious:
s128(3) sexual activity while complainant is asleep or unconscious is non consensual- based on the fact at the relevant time for consent is the time of sexual activity, without reference to things said or done before or afterwards. therefore prior agreement to SA that is to occur once the complainant is asleep does not constitute consent.
Affected by alcohol or drugs:
May impact persons ability to give valid consent. Question is whether they were effected to such an extent that they were incapable of understanding the situation and giving rational and reasonable consent. It may be possible for crown to prove that a complainant was not consenting even though she may have no recollection of the events herself.