Sex Flashcards
With a case of sexual violation, what you must prove beyond reasonable doubt?
There was an intentional act by the defendant involving sexual connection with the complainant AND
the complainant did not consent AND
the defendant did not believe the complainant was consenting OR
If the defendant did believe the complainant was consenting the grounds for the belief were not reasonable
Is there a defense if the person you rape is your spouse (legally married)’?
No, unless the offending happened before 1986
Section 128B CA 1961?
The term of imprisonment is not exceeding 20 years and everyone who commits sexual violation must be sentenced to imprisonment unless the Court thinks that person should not be sentenced to imprisonment;
-the particular circumstances of the person convicted and
-the particular circumstances of the offence including nature of conduct
Section 128(1)(a)
A person
Rapes
Another person
Section 128(1)(b)
A person
Has unlawful sexual connection
With another person
Definition of sexual connection
Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes of;
-a part of the body of another person
-an object held or manipulated by another person
Connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus
The continuation of a kind of described connection in paragraph a and b
What is the difference between penetrate and introduce into?
There is no difference and it’s not necessary to differentiate between the two
Definition of penetration in the slightest degree?
Any penetration no matter how slight or fleeting is sufficient
How do you prove penetration?
-Complainants evidence
-Medical exam, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
-The defendants admissions
Definition of genitalia
Includes the penis and testicles of a male and vulva and vagina of a female
Also includes surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occuring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male female or or indeterminate sex)
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprises of reproduction organs, interior and exterior. They include the vulva and the labia both interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina
What was held in R V N?
The offence is sufficiently proved by penetration of the vulva by the penis, proof of penetration of the vagina is not required
Definition of penis
Includes surgically reconstructed or constructed organ analogous to a naturally occuring penis (whether the person is male, female or of undetermined sex)
Why is anal penetration not considered rape?
The anus is not defined as part of a person’s genitalia, the charge would be unlawful sexual connection
What are genuine medical purposes?
When a doctor is legitimately performing something such as cervical screening or a prostate exam this is not a violation.
If the doctor pretends it’s for a medical procedure but does it for sexual gratification this may amount to sexual violation
Define continuation?
Where sexual activity starts consensually but the consent is later withdrawn
What was held in R v Kaitamaki in relation to continuation
If after penetrating the victim the defendant realises the victim is not consenting but continues anyway that amounts to rape
What is section 127?
There is no of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age. It therefore is not a defence that the victim was too young or too old to have sexual connection
What is the subjective and objective test in relation to consent that the crown must prove?
Subjective: victim did not consent
Subjective: offender did not believe the complainant was consenting OR
objective: if the offender believed the victim was consenting, the grounds for the belief were not reasonable
R v Cox - consent
Consent must be full, voluntary and informed, freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement
R v cook - consent
To be effective consent must be real, genuine or true consent and that it is conveyed by words conduct or both
What is reluctant consent (R v Herbert)
The court held that true consent may be given hesitantly or reluctantly and may be regretted afterwards, provided it’s given without fear of the application of force of the result of actual or threatened force then the act of sexual connection would not be rape
What is it up to the crown to prove be for the subjective test in relation to absence of consent?
That the complainant was not consenting, it is not up to defence to prove that the victim was consenting
Who’s point of view is the subjective test of belief in consent?
The defendants, what were they thinking at the time? If the defendant believed the victim was consenting you need to applying the objective test to see if they had reasonable grounds for their belief