severan art Flashcards

1
Q

Background on Sectilius Severus

A

becomes emperor in 193 AD - only african emperor (born in Leptis Magna in north africa)

claimed to be the illegitimate son of Marcus Aurelius and thus claims antonine heritage - links himself to them aesthetically

Came to power after a period of unrest caused by the power vacuum of the end of a dynasty (like post nero’s death) - uncertainty surrounding succession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Portrait head of Septimius Severus at Palazzo Massimo

A

196/7 AD, Rome

falls into the ‘adoption type’ -> greater emphasis on his beard than earlier accession portraits, hair becomes more flamboyant, in line with the tropes of antonine portraiture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Portrait head of Septimius Severus, Nicosia

A

AD 193, Nicosia

earliest portrait type so called ‘accession type’ -> has the curly hair from antonine period, still the prevailing ‘period face’ or ‘zeitgzeigt’ as those competing to be emperor wanted to be as close to the antonines as possible

COMPARANDA: coinage of the times of unrest - striking similarity and lack of individualising features in the portrait - all beards and curly hair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Portrait of Septimius Severus at Stuttgart

A

196-211 AD, Stuttgart

example of the ‘serapis type’ so named because of the likeness to roman statues of egyptian god sarapis - but this similarity doesn’t seem deliberate, its a retrospective name applied by scholars

introduction of the forked beard, deep divot in the centre and slightly longer - 3 locks of hair on the forehead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Portrait of Julia Domna, Louvre

A

200 AD

similar to antonine women but with the wig element of hair even more exaggerated -> even including strands of her real hair escaping from beneath the wig onto her cheek

wig as a luxury item and status symbol - wig has a corrugated, ridged effect and would have been made from real human hair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how wigs can help date statues of women in the severan period

A

in 220 AD the hair/wig is pushed behind the ears and the ears are fully exposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Colossal Julia Domna, Wilton House

A

193-211 AD, well preserved and even restored in the 1800s but ended up in a river -> iron pins from restoration work swelled and destroyed the features of the face

very nice example of the wig hair phenomena

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Imperial Family portrait of Severan Dynasty

A

Fayyum, 199 AD, portrait on tondu wood, survives because of dry conditions - same style as burial portraits from Fayyum

stylistically unusual imperial portrait - mother and father depicted in golden laurels with precious stones, and two sons all depicted together

men and boys wearing tunic and cloaks, recognisable facial hair and wigs, strays in some details ie: number of locks of hair

FACE OF GETA (son) MISSING - rubbed off, portrait also discovered in a sewer but that may be an accident. Caracalla had Geta killed so he could be sole emperor in the year of their joins accession (Damnatio memoriae)

INTERPRETATION: emphasising family cohesion and imperial succession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Arch of the Argentarii, Rome

A

Forum Boarium, AD 203/4

dedicated by local trades people who raised money to honour the emperor together - public monument at private expense

covered in friezes, panel of septimius severus sacrificing with Julia Domna preset, conspicuous gap to her side - recarved to remove Geta

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Arch of Septimius Severus at Leptis Magna (small details)

A

north africa, 282/3 AD (Severus’ home town!)

quadrafrons (4 faced arch), blanketed in carvings, fruits and crops in filigree to demonstrate abundance, mythological scenes and images of imperial family (inscription missing)

vine scroll with cupid figures -> quite early imperial imagery, decorative

trophee (wooden post with captured arms of an enemy pinned to the top, shows women in phrygian cap to show they are not roman but rather conquered people)

Spandrils (corners) have barbarian prisoners

Winged Victory figures - demonstrate stylistic changes -> figure is graceful still but more static, cloth is deeply incised but more a pattern of fabric rather than naturalistic, legs pressed together awkwardly, focus shifting to what is represented/symbolised by art rather than attempting naturalism. use of the drill also changed the style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Arch of Septimius Severus at Leptis Magna (significant friezes)

A

282/3 AD

sculpted panels depict imperial family surrounded by gods and making sacrifices, gods giving divine sanction to imperial family for acts of piety

Triumphal Procession: COMPARANDA: Arch of Titus in Rome (80s AD)

emperor with sons in chariot, similar components, horses, figures and arrangement to Titus

Severan is much flatter, with shallower relief, diminishing naturalism in public monuments, the perspective is messed with to fit elements into the scene

drill carving - deeper and thicker incisions can make drapery rigid - not just a provincial change - in rome in imperial monuments more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arch of Septimius Severus in Forum Romanum

A

AD 203

dedicated by senate and people of rome (inscription intact) for his ‘triumphs’ over parthians on the eastern frontier of empire. didn’t really expand, successfully consolidated river euphrates front, annexed settlement beyond - pushed them back a little

style: like columns of Trajan and Marcus Aurelius rather than other arches. story in spiral on columns, here it zigzags
figures have greater distortion even than trajan’s column - necessary for column because of the shape and space, here figures stumpier and stranger proportions, over sides heads etc

deep relief - accomplished with drill so smaller figures are almost free standing particularly in the battle reliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Portrait of Caracalla, Vatican

A

211 AD

new paradigm of representation of emperor in portraiture

curly hair still, but close cropped, short facial hair, frowning expression, creases around his nose and mouth, furrowed brow (expression over interpreted because why would he represent himself as cruel on purpose?)

positive interpretation (more likely): image of a soldier-emperor, man of action who actively campaigns with his troops - serious about job / thoughtful

though he is succeeded by young men who tend more idealising - they maintain the soldier emperor aesthetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Portrait of Maximinus Thrax

A

235-8 AD

similar hair, furrowed face, like many after him he is chosen my his army and then permitted by the senate -> makes sense because of increased presence and activity around the Euphrates so lots of Balkans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Trajan Decius in Capitoline Museum

A

has the caracallan furrows in brow and similar cropped hair, also has the concerned/preoccupied facial expression to show he’s deeply engaged in his role as emperor