Session 8 - Validity Flashcards
Internal Validity
The study measures what it’s supposed to measure and its conclusions accurately reflect the studied relationship.
A study that is internally valid is one that has
minimized error
minimized alternative explanations for the findings (chance, bias, confounding)
drawn appropriate conclusions from the data obtained.
Is a study that includes a diagnostic test valid if you have not confirmed that the test you are using in valid?
NO!
Content Validity
the extent to which measure is judged to reflext the underlying concept (construct) of the measure, without also including irrelevant or extraneous elements.
Criterion-Related Validity
Compared to criterion or some “gold standard”
Concurrent (done simultaneously)
Predictive (big in PT) the extent to which the measure being taken is associated with some future measure or event.
problem with validation of new tests on gold standard
new tests can appear to perform poorly compared to standard (but weaker) traditional tests.
Construct Validity
has to do with identifying the construct or theory being tested. this is largely used because there is no standard available for criterion validity
Face Validity
BECAUSE!
What does a validity statistic compare?
Two DISSIMILAR ways of measuring an outcome rather than comparing the same measurement between two testers or over two different times.
allows assessment of association between two dissimilar measures with or without similar units of measure
Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient.
what does Cronbach’s Alpha asses?
Internal Consistency.
the degree to which items in a scale correlate to each other or the total score. therefore it appears more related to the construct of the scape than to it’s reliability.
how well items are correlated to each other or to the total score.
What could a very strong Cronbach’s alpha indicate?
an item may actually be redundant and the scale can be streamlined.
Nonparametric correlation coefficients
Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (ordinal data)- most common of non parametrics
contingency coefficient ( dichotomous data)
Odds Ratio (dichotomous data)
Kendall coefficient of concordance (ordinal data)
Sensitivity, specificity , predicitve value and likelihood ratios
Pitfalls in ascertaining test performance characteristics
we don’t have a gold standard for most PT_related medical diagnoses.
tests are frequently tested on a different population than they will later be used on.
Statistically significant tests
given testing conditions, the prevalence is already atypical of what exists in the real population .
Responsiveness
the degree to which the test score can be expected to change when people actually change (sensitivity to change)