session 6: cancer genetics & treatment Flashcards
what is AML?
clonal expansion of myeloid progenitors (blasts) in the peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM) or other tissue.
how is AML diagnosed clinically?
at least 20% blasts are present in PB or BM UNLESS:
- molecular diagnosis
- myeloid sarcoma present - tumour mass consisting of blast cells
- erythrocyte leukaemia
what is breast cancer?
Heterogeneous group of neoplasms mostly arising from epithelial cells lining milk ducts. most common cancer in women (30% of new cancer cases). 1/8 risk. risk factors include, weight, age, genetics, alcohol and HRT but family history is strongest. 20% of cases are familial
Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants is suspected if?
- early onset <50 years
- 2 or more breast primaries
- both breast & ovarian cancer in single person
- BrCa in close relatives from same side
- at-risk populations eg. ashkenazi jewish
- family member with confirmed mutation
- male breast cancer
- ovariant cancer at any age
what guidelines are there for BrCa diagnosis?
- probability models eg. BOADICEA, Myriad II).
- NICE 2013 lowered prior BC risk from 20 to 10% to access genetic testing meaning referrals of unaffecteds has increased
- NICE 2018 recommends BRCA1 &2 testing for all <50 with TNC regardless of family history
what complications are there to clinical diagnosis of BrCa?
- incomplete penetrance, sporadic cancer and phenocopies
what is HBOC syndrome ?
- increased risk of early onset BR and Ov, pancreatic, prostate Ca and melanoma(BRCA2 only)
- up to 7% of BrCa cases
- incomplete penetrance - up to 87% risk of breast and 63 % risk of ovarian, 20% prostate, 7% pancreatic
- BRCA1 accounts for 66% of cases and BRCA2 accounts for 34%
what is the role of BRCA1and 2 proteins?
DNA repair including homologous recombination repair of ds-breaks and nucleotide excision repair.
- BRCA1 forms complex with BARD1 and colocalises with BRCA2 and RAD51 at DNA damage site and BRCA2/RAD51 mediate homologous recombination
- BRCA1 also involved in cellular pathways controlling cell cycle progression and check-point control, gene transcription and regulation
describe the mutation spectrum of BRCA1 and 2 genes?
- majority are LOF in coding regions of both genes
- 20% are VUS
- 10% are large rearrangements
- founder mutations eg. 1.40 ashkenazi jewish have one of the three founder mutations
what is the testing strategy for BRCA1/2 testing?
- NGS sequence anlaysis for all coding exons and intron boundaries
- dosage analysis
- targeted sanger for founder mutations
- sanger for familial testing
- NGS screen for unaffecteds where there is no DNA from affected family member
- may test FFPE from affected if no other sample available but sensitivity may differ
- VUS - segregation and tumour DNA from FFPE can be examined for LOH (WT allele deleted increases pathogenicity)
what ethical issues should be considered with BRCA testing?
- counselling for diagnostic and predictive testing
- PNT and minor testing not usually offered
- age of onset and severity very variable - make sure patient understands
- family member may not share result. also a family members result may be inferred through testing other family members
what treatments are available for BRCA?
- surgery, chemo, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted drugs: Herceptin for HER2+ or tamoxifen for ER+
- mastectomy reduces BC risk by 90%
- oopherectomy reduces ovarian cancer risk by 53%
- Tamoxifen used for ER+ BC. 25% of BRCA1 and 80% of BRCA2 breast cancers are oestrogen-receptor + . Drug reduces risk of BC by up to 50%
- PARP inhibitors
how do PARP inhibitors work?
Parp is an enzyme that repairs ss DNA breaks by base excision repair. In BRCA null cells, double stranded breaks are not repaired and PARP inhibition leads to cell apoptosis
what surveillance strategies are there for BRCA families?
self-examination, clinical examination, mammography and MRI,
which cancer predisposition syndromes give an increased risk of breast cancer ?
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) -TP53 60% risk of BC by age 45
- · Cowden Syndrome PTEN - increased risk of malignant tumours including BC
· Neurofibromatosis type I - NF1 - moderately increased risk
which genes can give rise to predisposition to familial breast cancer?
ATM - · Ataxia telangiectasia (AR) and heterozygous pathgenic variants cause 52% BC risk
CHEK2 - Li-Fraumeni type 2 but c.1100delC in particular has been associated with an 25-39% risk of breast cancer
PALB2 - 45% risk of BC, increased risk of prostate cancer. biallelic variants cause Fanconi anaemia
RAD50, BARD1
SNPs have been identified which each have small risk but PRS can be calculated for associated SNPs which could have significant impact on BC risk
what percentage of CRC are sporadic and what % are inherited?
- 85% are sporadic
- 15% inherited (3-5% lynch syndrome, >1% FAP and >10% other inherited cancer)
what causes lynch syndrome
AD mutation in a mismatch repair gene MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM followed by secondary somatic loss of remaining copy of gene (LOH)
1/250 affected and gene dependent & age-related penetrance with variable expressivity.
mean age of onset is 45 years but higher in MSH6 and PMS2 cases and frequently non-penetrant (mutation frequencies for these likely to be higher as often missed)
cumulative Incidences of cancer (up to 70):
MLH1 (GI cancers) and MSH2 (greater variety of cancers) = 72%
MSH6= 54%
PMS2 = 18%
what % of germline mutations are found in MLH1 and MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and 3’ deletions in EPCAM upsteam of MSH2? what other types of mutations account for lynch syndrome?
MLH1 and MSH2 = 90%
MSH6 = 10%
PMS2 (&PMS1) = <1%
EPCAM 3’ dels upstream of MSH2 = 3%
creating EPCAM-MSH2 fusion transcripts resulting in epigenetic hypermethylation of the MSH2 promoter and loss of MSH2 expression
- 10Mb inversion on 2p disrupts MSH2 and is cause of unexplained lynch
- LINE-1-mediated retrotranspositional insertion in PMS2 not identified by MLPA and sanger
- germline methylation of MLP1 promoter is heritable cause of lynch
what is the testing strategy for lynch syndrome?
- Amsterdam & Bethesda criteria (more sensitive less specific)
- FFPE testing for IHC and MSI prior to mutation screening
- MLH1 pm
- BRAF mutation (V600E)
- Germline testing
how is IHC used for lynch testing?
- antibodies test for presence/absense of MLH1 MSH2 MSH6 PMS2 proteins
- 95% senseitive for DNA MMR deficiency
- concurrent loss of MLH1-PMS2 or MSH2 and MSH6 (heterodimers)
- If IHC shows protein loss we do not test for MSI as we expect there to be MSI
- loss of MLH1/PMS2 > MLH1pm studies on DNA extracted from tumour before mutation testing
V600E done in combination with MLH1pm as this combo is stronger indication that the tumour is sporadic - patients with normal IHC undergo MSI as may be missense mutation that results in a non-functional but present protein (drawback of IHC) (5% of cases)
• Loss of MSH2 function manifests as absent IHC expression of MSH2 and MSH6
• Loss of MLH1 function (deleterious mutation or promoter hypermethylation) is detectable as absent IHC expression of MLH1 and PMS2
• Isolated absence of MSH6 or PMS2 protein suggests mutation in the respective gene
• LS-MLH1 type is frequently caused by missense mutations – resulting in altered, non-functional protein, but the mutant protein may be expressed and retain its immunoreactivity. Therefore MSI-H with normal or weak expression of MLH1 in association with loss of PMS2 protein could be due to an inactivating mutation in PMS2, or a missense mutation in MLH1
how is MSI used for lynch testing?
- DNA extracted from tumour tissue and tested for length alterations to microsatellites
- tests 5 microsatellite markers
- 2 or more altered markers between tumour and germline are MSI-H - indicates MMR gene defect
- MSS = not MMR defect
- 1/5 warrants further investigation
- may have tissue mosaicism
how is MLH1 pm used for lynch testing?
• Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter has been shown in a high proportion of sporadic cancers (approx. 15%). Results in absence of MLH1 protein on IHC
- any IHC showing loss of MLH1 need MS-MLPA for MLH1pm. The kit tests for abnormal methylation at 5 sites in the MLH1 promoter, 4 sites in MSH2 promotor (indicative of 3’EPCAM deletions) and other MMR promoter regions
- samples with no abnormal methylation should be tested for germline MLH1 mutation
- hypermathylation is a somatic change in tumour but has rarely been seen in blood as a heritable mutation so blood can be tested at same time as tumour
how is BRAF (V600E) testing used in lynch syndrome?
- associated with MLH1 methylation = sporadic cancer
V600E occurs in non MSI-high tumours and used as a screen to avoid unnecessary MMR gene screening - BUT also occurs in MMR germline mutation carriers at 1% frequency. SO it is done at same time as MLH1pm as a stronger indicator that tumour is sporadic
-• Constitutional MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is not associated with V600E
how is germline testing used in lynch syndrome?
NGS panel for MMR gene sequencing and dosage. PMS2 is challenging due to pseudogene. The 3’ end of the gene is non-amenable to NGS analysis and required long-range nested PCR to amplify PMS2 only
large rearrangements detected by NGS dosage, MLPA or array
how do EPCAM dels silence MSH2?
EPCAM dels account for 2% of lynch cases. dels of 3’ EPCAM are associated with methylation of MSH2. Dels may extend into MSH2 promotor or 5’ coding region and result in loss of the EPCAM termination codon and 3’ UTR causing transcriptional read-through from EPCAM into MSH2. smaller dels cause methylation of the MSH2 promoter and transcriptional silencing. MLPA kits available for EPCAM 3’dels and UTR/MSH2 promoter. Dels that do not extend to MSH2 coding sequence are assumed to be pathogenic by causing MSH2 pm > confirmed by MS-MLPA. 3’ EPCAM deletions are heritable and risk of CRC similar to that of MSH2 mutation carriers.
what is the testing pathway for lynch syndrome?
- Evaluation of tumour tissue for MSI/ IHC of the four MMR proteins. The presence of MSI in the tumour alone is not sufficient to diagnosis Lynch syndrome because 10%-15% of sporadic colorectal cancers exhibit MSI. IHC testing helps identify the MMR gene that most likely harbours a germline mutation.
- • If the MLH1 immunohistochemistry result is abnormal, testing of the tumour for methylation and/or somatic BRAF mutations to help identify those tumours more likely to be sporadic than hereditary. First do a BRAF V600E test, if neg do methyation. If neg do sequencing.
- Molecular genetic testing of the MMR genes (depending which is lost on IHC) to identify a germline mutation when findings are consistent with Lynch syndrome.
NICE recommends Cascade testing of relatives should be employed where appropriate as it is cost-effective
what is the function of MMR genes?
- recognises errors that escape DNA polymerase proofreading. without repair, random mutations occur.
- MSH2-MSH6 repair single base mismatches = MutSa
In the absence of MSH6, MSH2 pairs with MSH3 = MutSb. MSH2-MSH3 recognises large loop out errors
- MLH1-PMS2 = MutLa heterodimer
in the absence of PMS2, MLH1 pairs with PMS1 (MutLb).
MSH6 and PMS2 are unstable in the absence of their dominant partners.
what syndrome results from germline homozygous or compound het MMR gene mutations?
mismatch repair cancer syndrome (MMRCS) – a rare childhood cancer predisposition syndrome with 4 main tumour types; haematological malignancies, brain/central nervous system tumours, colorectal tumours and multiple intestinal polyps.
what treatment/prevention is there for CRC?
colectomy, routine colonoscopy to prevent and removal of precancerour polyps.
Chemoprevention = aspirin for people at high risk of CRC
what is familial adenomatous polyposis?
- AD
- thousands of colonic polyps - most common polyposis syndrome (1/8500 births). 95% of patients have polyps by 35 years
- caused by APC mutations (tumour suppressor gene involved in WNT signalling)
- normal APC regulates B-catenin degredation, mutant APC leads to accumulation of b-catenin which activates transcription factors resulting in expression of target genes such as proto-oncogenes
- loss of APC protein causes adenoma (benign) > carcinoma (cancer originating in epithelial cells) sequence
- 10% of cases are de novo
- symptoms include rectal bleeding, anaemia, abdominal pain, change in bowel habits and weight loss
- 100% risk of CRC if colectomy doesnt happen at early age
- with screening, most patients are diagnosed before the development of CRC
- annual colonoscopy screening begins from 10 years if APC mutation or at risk
- certain mutations (such as 5’ or 3’) cause attenuated FAP (1-100 polyps)
- MUTYH responsible for 18% of APC negative cases
what is the mutation spectrum of APC gene causing FAP?
- 80% are LOF SNVs with some frequent mutations
- 60% of mutations occur in a mutation cluster with highest number of polyps and younger onset
- 5’ or 3’ or final exon mutations may develop attenuated FAP with reduced adenomas (benign tumour that may grow) as protein doesn’t undergo NMD
- missense mutations may have small increased risk of polyps
- somatic mosaicism in 11% of de novo cases results in familial variability
- promoter mutations cause silencing of the gene
how is FAP diagnosed?
- family history and colorectal phenotype
- genetic testing - CRC panel can detect 5% mosaicism(90% pick-up rate)
- dosage/MLPA detects partial or whole gene deletion - 10% of APC cases
- blood sequencing may fail to detect mosaic cases in singletons (de novo occurrence)
- presymtomatic testing offered <16 years (rare) as early screening or reduces cost if no screening needed for negative cases
what treatments are available for FAP?
- surgical resection when polyposis develops
- chemoprevention: low toxicity, cheap and effective and can delay development of adenomas and colectomy. can prevent recurrence after surgery eg. NSAIDs or aspirin
what is attenuated FAP?
- <100 polyps, older age of onset, milder
- later diagnosis but increased risk for CRC (70% by 80 years)
- 5’, 3’ or last exon mutations where NMD doesn’t occur
- underdiagnosed
what is MUTYH-associated polyposis?
- AR caused by MUTYH (adenine base excision repair gene)
- similar presentation to AFAP. increased risk of adenoma and cancer
- average diagnosis at 48 years
- 40-100% lifetime risk of CRC
- accounts for 1% of CRC
how is MUTYH-associated polyposis diagnosed?
- genetic testing for those with 10-100 polyps and no APC mutation
- testing offered >18 years as colonoscopy begins from then
- FH consistent with recessive inheritance
what is the mutation spectrum for MUTYH-associated polyposis
- 99% are missense and 2 common mutations often tested prior to whole gene screen
- full gene analysis offered if one mutation found
- if only one mutation identified, there may be a rare deletion, mutation in another gene is responsible or polyposis may be due to non-hereditary factors. MLPA is available.
- carrier testing can be offered to partners, may just be for two common mutations
- many with polyposis tested for APC and MUTYH simultaneously on a panel
what causes CML?
- t(9;22)(q34;q11), with the shortened chromosome 22,
designated as Philadelphia chromosome, 22q- - a juxtaposition of the ABL1 gene from chromosome 9
and the BCR gene from chromosome 22, resulting in a BCR–ABL1 fusion gene that codes for proteins with high tyrosine kinase activity and promotes cell proliferation
what are the progression stages of CML?
chronic phase (3-5 years)
accelerated phase (9 months) AND/OR Blast Crisis (6 months)
Without effective therapy, most cases of CML progress from CP to AP/BP within 3-5 years of diagnosis
what are the presenting features of CML?
Fatigue - anaemia and bleeding
Night sweats
weight loss
shortness of breath
Splenomegaly
what proportion of CML patients have the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene ?
100%
90-95% have the characteristic t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) reciprocal translocation, whereas the remaining patients have either variant translocations involving a third (or even fourth chromosome) in addition to the chromosome 9 and 22, or a cryptic translocation involving 9q34.1 and 22q22.2 that cannot be identified by G-banded karyotype analysis.
how fusion is produced has No impact on outcome
what is the treatment for CML and how does it work?
imatinib (TKI)
competes with ATP for BCR-ABL1 binding site inactivating phosphorylation
why might CML TKI drug resistance emerge? what can be given instead?
subclones that have BCR-ABL1 mutations
second and third generation TKIs can be given
what should be done for CML patients on treatment with undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcripts ?
stop treatment and should remain in remission for at least a year
MRD monitoring detects disease at low levels and allows patients to resume treatment before any clinical presentation reappears
how are CML patients tested in the lab?
-G-banding analysis on blood or marrow of 10 cells and BCR/ABL1 FISH test for cryptic or variant translocations
-It is useful to carry out molecular analysis to confirm the presence of BCR::ABL1 gene rearrangement and to determine the nature of the rearrangement for future Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis.
-Patients with a positive result will benefit from treatment with Imatinib
- also scan for secondary abnormalities including +Ph, +8, +19, +21, -Y, i(17q).
how is the BCR::ABL1 fusion transcript identified mollecularly?
Reverse Transcription-qPCR
- uses cDNA to amplify BCR:ABL1 and ABL1
- uses probe located in ABL1 with 5’ reporter fluorophore and 3’ quencher-during extension, polymerase cleaves probe causing fluorescence which is directly proportional to the amount of target present
- known standards are used for comparison allowing exact amount of transcript to be determined
during treatment, how often is RT-qPCR undertaken for CML cases?
every 3 months until MMR is achieved
what is the prognosis for CML?
Most people with CML will have a very good prognosis – particularly those diagnosed in the chronic phase. Recent evidence suggests that if you respond well to treatment, you could have a similar life expectancy to someone who doesn’t have cancer.
what is the most common mechanism of resistance in CML?
- point mutation in BCR-ABL kinase domain
- Second and third generation TKIs e.g. Nilotinib, Dasatinib and Ponatinib have been developed to try to overcome this TKI resistance
T315I mutation was the most frequently detected - poor prognosis
what is CML?
a myeloproliferative neoplasm originating in stem cells in the bone marrow
what is ALL?
clonal expansion of lymphoid progenitor cells in the bone marrow (BM), lymph nodes, thymus, or spleen, leading to an accumulation of immature blast cells
what % of childhood leukaemia does ALL account for?
85% (85% B-cell and 15% T cell)
what are the symptoms of ALL?
- fatigue
- weight-loss
- shortness of breath
- bruising
- infections
- splenomegaly
- anaemia
- bone and joint pain
what is the priority for infant <1 year with ALL?
urgent priority (14 days) as survival considerably worse than for older children. 20% will relapse
what is the testing strategy for < 1 year old with ALL?
FISH analysis
- MLL (poor prognosis)
- ETV6/RUNX1 (good)
- BCR-ABL1 (poor)
Also do G-banded analysis on bone marrow or blood and analyse 10 (abnormal) or 20 cells if normal
what is the most common (50%) ALL abnormality in infants <1 year?
MLL translocation t(4;11)(q21;q23)
MLL (chr11) AF4(chr4)
poor prognosis
what is the most common ALL abnormality in 1-25 years? what is the prognosis?
what would the dual fusion probe show (red and green)?
If the dual fusion showed loss of green ETV6 signal 2F1R what does this indicate loss of and how does this affect prognosis?
give 2 other chromosomal abnormalities in ALL that could be detected with the ETV6-RUNX1 probe?
t(12;21) ETV6-RUNX1 t(12;21)(p13;q22)
good prognosis (>90% cure rate)
results in fusion protein with dominant negative effect - interferes with function of RUNX1 transcription factor
2Fusion1Red1Green
- loss of ETV6 gene = poor prognosis
- iAMP21 - ≥5 copies of RUNX1 , corresponding to ≥3 extra copies of gene on 1 copy of chromosome 21. poor prognosis
-extra copies of ETV6 and RUNX1 - polysomy of chr 21 and 12
after MLL rearrangements and ETV6-RUNX1, what is the 3rd-line test for B-ALL in < 1 years?
what is the prognosis
1) t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR-ABL1 rearrangement (4%)
poor prognosis
what is the most common rearrangement in T-ALL?
TCR (T-cell receptor) rearrangements - usually placed next to transcription factors
unknown prognosis
what is the most significant genetic prognostic factors for adult ALL?
what is the prognosis?
what is the treatment?
t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR-ABL1 Philadelphia chromosome - 30% of adult ALL cases
poor prognosis
TKI therapy enhances long-term outcome
what is the second-line test in adult B-ALL? what is the prognosis?
t(4;11)(q21;q23)
MLL (chr11) AF4(chr4)
poor prognosis
other than (4;11)(q21;q23) MLL ; AF4 what other common rearrangements involving MLL are found in ALL?
o t(9;11)
o t(11;19)
other than BCR:ABL1, MLL rearrangements and ETV6-RUNX1 what other common rearrangements are found in ALL?
- high hyperdiploidy (51-56 chromosomes) - good prognosis
- hypodiploidy <44 chromosomes
- TCF3 rearrangements
- IGH rearrangements
- Dic (9;12)
- Dic(9;20)
Abn/del(9p)
what are disadvantages of G-banded analysis for leukaemia diagnosis?
- normal marrow may outgrow leukaemic clone
- high failure rate
- poor quality
- crytic and subtle rearrangements
minimum 2 cultures should be set up
if chromosome analysis fails or normal karyotype obtained and interphase FISH identifies RUNX1 extra signals in ALL sample, what further testing should be carried out?
what is the prognosis?
interphase FISH for high hyper diploidy (good prognosis)
why is multiplex reverse transcription-qPCR required in leukaemia diagnosis?
identifies exact breakpoint so molecular monitoring can be undertaken during treatment
- can be used to identify gene fusions
why might a karyotype be helpful at leukaemia relapse?
- identify karyotype evolution or secondary malignancy