Servitudes Flashcards

1
Q

Servitudes list

A

Servitudes are non-possessory rights (to do or to control) on real property ​

  1. Easement (right to use someone else land or prevent someone from using it)
  2. Profit (right to take something for the land)
  3. License (revocable right to use the land)
  4. Covenant (right to prevent or force something in someone else land)
    1. Real Covenant (Court of law right to prevent or force something in someone else land)
    2. Equitable Servitude (Court of equity right to prevent or force something in someone else land)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an easement

A

An easement is a type of servitude,

A non-possessory property interest that confers a right to use another’s land for an specific purpose

  • Servient estate = burdened land
  • Dominant estate = benefited land (not always applicable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of easement ( classifications)

A

Classification by the involvement of one or two lands:

  • Easement appurtenant - entitles a dominant estate owner to use a servient estate’s land
  • Easement in gross - entitles an individual or entity (not a dominant landowner) to use the servient estate

Classification because of the rights it gives

  • Affirmative easement- entitles its holder to make affirmative use of the servient estate (Use of a road to cross)
  • Negative easement- entitles its holder to restrict the servient estate from otherwise permissible activities (ELEMENTAL RESTRICTIONS) (LASS) (e.g.
    • L (Light) A (Airflow, view) S (Support) S (Stream of water)

Classification because whether is commercial or personal

  • Commercial purpose (benefit)
  • Personal enjoyment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Easement that are personal and commercial

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Classification by the involvement of one or two lands:

A

Classification by the involvement of one or two lands:

  • Easement appurtenant - entitles a dominant estate owner to use a servient estate’s land
    • Attaches to the dominant estate and passes automatically (even if not mentioned in a conveyance)
  • Easement in gross - entitles an individual or entity (not a dominant landowner) to use the servient estate
    • The benefit does not attach to land; there is no dominant estate, but the burden does.
    • E.g., right to place a billboard on another’s lot, right to run utility line across land, right to fish in another’s pond
    • Similar to a license, but irrevocable; may be transferred
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do you create an Easement? (PING)

A

PING

  • Prescription
  • Implication
  • Necessity
  • Grant or reservation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Scope of Easement (Expansion)

A

An easement’s scope is determined by the terms or conditions that created it. In interpreting an easement’s scope, courts will consider the reasonable intent of the original parties

  • Easement holders cannot unilaterally expand the scope of their easement (e.g., through overuse or misuse)
    • Overuse or misuse of an easement does not terminate the easement
    • Creates a Remedy for violation = injunction (Servient owner’s remedy is an injunction)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Transfer exceptions for easements

A

All easements transfer automatically with the land. However, there are two exceptions:

  1. Personal easement in gross: the burden of the easement transfers, but not the benefit.
  2. Bona fide purchaser: If a purchaser doesn’t know or shouldn’t know about the burden of the easement, he takes free from the easement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Creation of easement by express grant or reservation

A

Easements may be expressly created by grant or reservation

  • Grant - an express grant of the easement
    • Created by instrument (e.g., written agreement) in which the servient estate owner gives easement to owner of dominant estate
  • Reservation - granter conveys title to land but reserves the right to continue using the land for a designated purpose
    • Granter may only reserve an easement for himself
      • Void if reserved for the benefit of another
      • E.g., 0 conveys property to A, reserving an easement allowing access to a path across the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Requirements of a creation of an easement by grant

A

Requirements - express easements must be:

  1. In writing (otherwise will violate SoF); and
  2. Signed by the servient estate holder;
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Creation of easement by prescription

A

A process of acquiring an easement; similar to acquiring title by adverse possession. Is not called adverse possession because is to obtain an easement (nonpossessory right)

Requirements (CHAO) - acquirer’s use of another’s land must be:

  1. Continuous – for the applicable statutory period
  2. Hostile - without owner’s permission
  3. Actual & Exclusive use - the owner does not use the land
  4. Open and notorious - owner knows or should know of the easement

Note - an easement can also be terminated by prescription if the servient landowner interferes with the easement sufficiently to satisfy the above requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Creation of Easement By Implication

A

An easement legally implied based on prior use by a common granter on land subsequently divided into multiple plots

Requirements:

  1. Easement exists prior to division of a single tract of land;
  2. Common grantor’s use is continuous and apparent;
  3. Use is reasonably necessary for enjoyment of the dominant tenement; and
  4. Parties intended the use to continue after division of the land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Easement by implication exceptions to prior use

A

Exceptions – easement may be implied without prior use where:

  1. Subdivision plat - lots in a subdivision are sold with reference to a map plan, or
  2. Profit a prendre - holder of a profit a prendre has an implied easement to pass over the land’s surface as reasonably necessary to extract materials (e.g., wood, coal)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Creation of easement by necessity

A

An easement can arise if access to or from a property is impossible without the easement (i.e., the easement’s existence becomes necessary)

  • Creation - usually arises when a landowner sells a portion of her property and the resulting division deprives one lot owner of access to a public road or utility
    • The owner of the servient estate can choose a reasonable location for the easement
  • Termination - expires automatically when the necessity ends
  • Easement by necessity may only be used for easement of access
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Difference between an easement by implication and by necessity

A

They both have a prior common ownership requirement, however, the difference is that:

  • Necessity: Requires STRICT necessity
  • Implication: Requires reasonable necessity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Negative easements (definition and category)

A

Entitles the holder to prevent the servient landowner from engaging in otherwise permissible actions on his own land

Four categories of acts may be prevented:

  1. Light
  2. Air
  3. Support
  4. Stream of water from an artificial flow

Creation - can only be created by an express grant (writing signed by grantor)

Note -restrictive covenants are utilized more frequently than negative easements to prevent a landowner from engaging in certain activities on their land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How can you terminate an easement (MR CAPEND)

A
  1. Merger:
    • the same person owns the servient land and the easement
  2. Release
    • Written deed of release is given
  3. Condemnation
  4. Abandonment
    • Physical act required, mere words insufficient
  5. Prescription
    • CHAO, but without the Actual element
  6. Estoppel
    • Material changes in position, caused by the holder conduct and representations
  7. Necessity ends
    • the easement extinct because of the extinction of the necessity
  8. Destruction
    • unless is willing destruction by the servient owner
18
Q

License

A

Is a type of easement, a License is a right to use another person’s (licensor’s) land, which is revocable at the licensor’s will

  • Not an interest in land – license is a privilege, not an interest in land (distinguish from affirmative easement)
  • Revocable - licensor may revoke the privilege at any time, unless estoppel applies
  • Inalienable- may not be assigned or transferred (Any attempt to do so revokes the license)
  • No SoF requirement - a license may be oral or written; they can result from easements that are invalid under the SoF. A license that fails to be on a written form would be a license.
    • E.g., an oral grant of a permanent easement between neighbors may result in a license b/c SoF not satisfied
      • Stoppel could make a license enforceable
      • E.g., oral permission for neighbor to use licensor’s pool, theater tickets (grant a license to ticket holders), right to use a parking lot
19
Q

Profit

A

Profit - a non-possessory property interest (positive easement on land) entitling its holder to enter a servient estate to remove resources (e.g., minerals, timber, soil, fish)

  • All rules governing easements apply to profits (i.e., creation, transferability, and termination)
  • Extinguishment – a profit may be extinguished through misuse or overuse of resources on the servient estate
20
Q

Covenants (general definition)

A

A promise (contract law creation) included in a contract or a deed, to do or refrain from doing something related to land

  • A contractual limitation or promise regarding land
  • Note – covenants are not property interests (like an easement)
  • Covenants can be positive (affirmative) or negative (restrictive)
21
Q

Types of covenants

A
  • Affirmative covenant - a promise to do something related to land
  • Restrictive covenant - a promise to refrain from doing something related to land

And (depending on the enforceability):

  • Real Covenant: a covenant that comes from the application of law
  • Equitable servitude: a covenant that comes from the application of equity
22
Q

Termination of a Covenant (MR CAPACE)

A

Just like Mr CAPEND, but with a different ending (no necessity or destruction)

  1. Merger:
    • the same person owns the servient land and the covenant
  2. Release
    • Written termination of the right of benefit
  3. Condemnation
  4. Abandonment
    • Physical act required by the person benefited by the covenant.
  5. Prescription
    • CHAO, the burdened owner of the land uses it without following the covenant
  6. Agreement
    • Agreement to terminate the covenant
  7. Changed Conditions
    • Covenant is unenforceable when the circumstances change so much that the covenant doesn’t bring a benefit
  8. Estoppel
    • Material changes in position, caused by the conduct and representations of the party benefited by the covenant
23
Q

How a covenant transfers?

A

Depends on whatever the transferred covenant is a burden or a benefit. Covenants transfer between parties (not necessarily landowner)

Burden transferring: WITHVN

Benefit transferring: (less requirements): WITV

24
Q

How to transfer of a burden created by a covenant

A

A successor in interest to the burdened estate will be bound by a covenant if the requirements below are satisfied

  1. Writing - original covenant was in writing
  2. Intent- parties intended to bind successors in interest
    • Look to language of the covenant; courts are liberal in construing requisite intent
  3. Touches and concerns the land - covenant must affect parties’ legal relations as landowners (a very low standard)
    • Homeowner association fees satisfy this requirement
  4. Horizontal and vertical privity - must exist between interested partie
    • Horizontal privity- relationship between the covenanting parties (e.g., granter/grantee, landlord/tenant, mortgagor/mortgagee)
    • Vertical Privity- voluntary relationship between covenanting parties and their successors in interest ( e.g., contract, devise, descent)
  5. Notice - successor in interest had notice of the covenant when she took her interest
    • Actual
    • Inquiry
    • Record
25
Q

How to transfer of a benefit created by a covenant

A

A successor in interest to the benefiting estate may enforce the covenant if the requirements below are satisfied

Requirements:

  1. Writing - original covenant was in writing
  2. Intent - original parties intended benefit to run with land
    • Look to language of the covenant; courts are liberal in construing requisite intent
  3. Touches and concerns the land
    • The covenant must affect parties’ legal relations as landowners (a very low standard)
  4. Vertical Privity - successors in interest are in vertical privity with the original covenanting parties (e.g., through contract, devise, or descent)
    • Horizontal privity is not required for majority of states
26
Q

Equitable Servitude

A

Equitable servitudes are covenants enforced in equity against successors through injunctive relief (i.e., injunction is the remedy)

  • I.e., a covenant that will be enforced against successors of the burdened land who have notice of the covenant
  • Privity is not required to bind successors
  • Equitable servitudes have ONLY the remedy of the injunction
27
Q

Transfer of a covenant as an equitable servitude

A

Depending of whether your are transferring a burden or a benefit the requirements are different

Burden transfer: WITN

  1. Writing - written promise
  2. Intent- original parties must intend to bind successors
  3. Touches and concerns the land
  4. Notice - successors of the burdened land had notice

Burden transfer: WIT, no notice is required

28
Q

Defenses to the enforcement of an equitable servitude

A

Defenses to enforcement- a court will not enforce an equitable servitude if any of the following conditions exist:

  1. Pervasive changes in the neighborhood
  2. Estoppel
  3. Acquiescence
  4. Unclean hands
  5. Laches
29
Q

Exception to the transferability of equitable servitudes

A

implied equitable servitude - may be implied from a common scheme for development of a residential subdivision

Requirements:

  • General scheme: A developer builds a real estate development with the same physical characteristics, this the covenant affects all properties
  • Notice:
    • Actual (e.g. deed)
    • Inquiry (physical similitudes will compel someone to inquiry)
    • Recording (the covenant was recorded)
30
Q

More on implied equitable servitude (aka Reciprocal Negative Servitudes)

A

Lot owners in residential subdivisions may enforce restrictions on the use of property against other subdivision lot owners (May be implied from a common development scheme of a residential subdivision)

Created through implication if:

  1. General/common scheme - when sales began, the developer had a general scheme for all parcels of the subdivision, including the subject lot
    • Common scheme may be evidenced through:
      1. Recorded plat,
      2. General pattern of restrictions, and/or
      3. Oral representations to early buyers
  2. Notice - owner of the subject lot had notice of the covenants in the deeds of other subdivision lots
  • Notice may be one of three types:
  1. Actual - literal knowledge of covenants,
  2. Inquiry - character of the neighborhood indicates a common restriction, or
  3. Record - chain of title for the owner’s lot includes a prior deed containing a covenant
31
Q

Describe what is adverse possession (essay)

A

A trespasser may acquire title to another’s property without compensation by possessing the property for a specified period, in a manner conflicting with the true owner’s rights

32
Q

Requirements for adverse possession CHAO

A
  1. Continuous for the statutory period - possession must be similar to an ordinary owner’s use of the property
    • Daily possession is not required if an ordinary user would not use the property daily (e.g., winter cabin)
  2. Hostile - possession must be without owner’s permission
    • No intent or knowledge required from the trespasser
  3. Actual and exclusive - must possess a reasonable portion of the property to the exclusion of the owner and the public
  4. Open and notorious - trespasser’s possession must be conspicuous, such that the true owner would know of the trespass if he inspected his property regularly
    • Owner need not actually know of the trespasser’s use
33
Q

Can a Tenant use Adverse Possession?

A

No,

if a tenant stays in possession after a lease has expired, he is presumed to have permission (i.e., tenancy at sufferance arises, as opposed to the beginning of an adverse possession period)

34
Q

How adverse possession works in these cases?

  • Disability
  • Future Interests
  • Govt Land
A
  • Disability- Sol does not begin to run if the true owner was under some disability when the adverse possession began
  • Future interests - Sol does not run against future interest holders until the interest becomes possessory
  • Govt. land - cannot be acquired through adverse possession
35
Q

Taking in adverse possession, what it is?

A

Adverse possessors can tack together successive periods of adverse possession to satisfy the statutory period, even if successive possession was by different adverse possessors

  • Must be successive - there cannot be gaps between periods of adverse possession
  • Privity- requires privity between successive adverse holders
    • Satisfied if subsequent possessor takes by descent, devise, or by deed purporting to convey title (NOT HOSTILE, NO OUSTING)
      • I.e., tacking not permitted if one adverse claimant ousts the preceding claimant
36
Q

What is the difference between ousting in Tacking and ousting in a concurrent estate?

A
  • Tacking: ousting terminates the continuity of the possession. The ousting is made by someone not owning the property
  • Concurrent estates: Normally a co-tenant holding the possession of the land would not be able to use adverse possession to take the entire title of the property. NO HOSTILITY ELEMENT.
    • Here the ousting is made by someone with title to the property
    • However, if the co-tenant P oust the non-P co-tenant then he would be able to take the whole title
37
Q

Adverse possession between concurrent owners

A

co-tenants may not adversely possess each others’ interests unless ouster has occurred

  • I.e., to adversely possess a co-tenant, the co­tenant must be excluded from the land for the statutory period
  • The statutory period begins once exclusion begins
38
Q

Restrictive Covenants when adverse possession is made

A

will not run with the land if the adverse possessor’s use of land violated the covenant; but covenant will run if the adverse possessor’s use complied with the covenant

39
Q

Can an adverse possessor lease the land?

A

adverse possessors can lease a portion of the land to a third party and still possess the property

40
Q

Color of title and adverse possession

A

Color of title - a claim of title to property not actually owned

  • Adversely possessing part of the property under color of title is sufficient to acquire title to the entire property
41
Q

Adverse possession and marketable title

A

title taken by adverse possession is not marketable, unless there has been an action to quiet title

42
Q

What is the duty of repair on an easement

A

Duty to repair

  • Easement holder has a duty to make repairs if he is the sole user
  • If both the servient landowner and the easement holder use an easement, the repair costs are apportioned