service delivery options & foundations of intervention for ELLs w/ LI Flashcards
Intro: options for ELL students who qualify for special education
- There is a range of options for ELL students who qualify for special education after RtI has been found to be insufficient to meet their specific learning needs.
- Available options depend greatly upon the particular school district and what state it is in
- You have to find out what your particular school district offers
option 1
1.Consultative, collaborative service provision in which ELL students remains in the general education classroom and the teacher receives assistance from special education personnel, ESL teachers, and/or bilingual staff members
option 2
- Pull-out services in English (or, ideally, bilingual tx) conducted 1-2x a week in specialist’s room
- Usually group, but could be indiv.
apantzoglou et al. (2016). Assessing measurement invariance for…Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(2), 254-266
- If ELL ch misidentified and pulled out of class for tx, may miss significant amounts of instruction in core subjects.
- We always have to ask when we pull ch out of class: what are they missing? How can we make tx correspond with what they’re missing in the classroom?
option 3
3.Placement in regular bilingual education or Sheltered English classroom with support from special education
Sparks (2016; Education Week, vo. 35, Issue 30, s3-s6.)
- In the Sheltered English stand-alone classroom, the teacher often focuses several hours of the day on direct lang instruction in addition to academic content
- Students of all lang backgrounds grouped by English proficiency levels so lessons can be tailored
2 other options
- Monolingual English special education classroom (hopefully with primary language support using a bilingual teacher, tutor, etc.)
- Bilingual special education classroom
II.LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT IN ELL STUDENTS: FOUNDATIONS:
Legal considerations
- IDEA: students who speak a second language must be assessed in both the primary (first) language (L1) and English
- Must show delays in BOTH the primary language and English in order to be diagnosed as having a language impairment (LI)
- ELL student– true LI if difficulties learning in BOTH languages
-the student with….
- age-appropriate L1 skills and low scores in English is NOT LI and is not a candidate for special education**
- We must make teachers and administrators aware of the difference between a student with typical underlying language learning ability who needs more time and exposure to English (non special education) and the student who is truly LI (qualifies for special education).
There is increased focus on diverse students in our schools
- No Child Left Behind Act (2001)–strong emphasis on achievement for low-income, diverse, ELL students
- Replaced by Every Student Succeeds Act
Every Student Succeeds Act (signed by Obama on 12/10/15)
- Requires annual math and reading testing grades 3-8 and once in high school
- Lets states set own education goals
- Reduces federal government’s role in dictating sanctions for low-performing schools
We must emphasize to all individuals involved with these students that
- Having a LI does not impede the ch in being able to “handle” two langs
- Ch with special needs can and do become bilingual
Kay-Raining Bird et al. 2005
- Children with Down Syndrome growing up in a French-English bilingual environment were able to acquire two languages
- They had a similar number of vocabulary words compared to a monolingual English-speaking group of children with Down Syndrome
Seung, Siddiqui, & Elder, 2006
- Research with a Korean child with autism showed that learning Korean first had a positive impact on his rate of English acquisition
- It also enabled him to continue his progress in Korean
**Reetzke, R., Zou, X., Sheng, L., & Katsos, N. (2015).
- Communicative development in bilingually exposed Chinese children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, pp. 813-825.
- Interviewed parents of Chinese children with ASD
Reetzke et al. 2015 found
- Being exposed to 2 langs did not adversely affect ch
- Still had good Chinese development