Sepsis/SIRS/MODS Flashcards

1
Q

Antipyretic Therapy in Critically Ill Septic Patients:
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Drewry et al 2016 Critical Care medicine

A

Antipyretic treatment does not significantly improve
28-day/hospital mortality in adult patients with sepsis.
suspected benefits:
- decreased metabolic rate –> decreases oxygen consumption, cardioprotective?
- disadvantage –> higher temp inhibits microorganism growth, slows viral replication, and augments antibiotic efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the benefits of elevated temperature in sepsis? Drewry et al 2016 CCM

A

high temperature inhibits microorganism growth, slows viral replication and augments antibiotic efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the negative effects of elevated temperature in sepsis? Drewry et al 2016 CCM

A

raises the metabolic rate, increases oxygen consumption, and can adversely affect cardiac function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A feasibility study investigating the utility of a point‐of‐care rapid immunoassay for detecting septic peritoneal effusion in dogs,
Human et al 2021, JVECC

A
  • RIA testing was similarly sensitive in identifying septic peritonitis compared to cytology and bacterial culture but was not very specific or accurate. As a stand-alone test, RIA commonly had false-positive test results, making it unreliable in identifying septic peritonitis
  • Cytology had the best overall predictive values and accuracy for diagnosing septic peritonitis (PPV 100%, NPV 97.9%, and accuracy 98%) compared to RIA and bacterial culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the most accurate diagnostic modality to identify septic peritonitis in dogs? Human et al 2021, JVECC

A

cytology of abdominal fluid (performed by clinical pathologist)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what survival rate for septic peritonitis are reported in current literature? Human et al 2021, JVECC

A

Recent veterinary literature reports survival
rates that vary from 36.4% to 89%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The ProCESS Investigators - 2014

A

protocol-based resuscitation of patients in whom septic shock was diagnosed in the emergency department did not improve outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Biomarker Guided Diagnosis of Septic Peritonitis in Dogs, Martiny et al, 2019, Vet Front

A

the marker that best differentiated SP
from NSA was the effusion lactate concentration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which type of lactate do bacteria mostly produce and which type do lactate meters usually measure?
Martiny et al, 2019, Vet Front

A

bacteria produce predominantly D-lactate isomers, lactate meters usually only measure L-lactate isomers (so potentially effusion lactate in SP even higher, or measured lactate from leukocyte cell metabolism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the “NO-generating loop”? Troia et al, 2020, Vet Front

A

methemoglobin activates endothelial cells by stimulation of inflammatory cytokines, leading to further iNOS expression, thus closing a “NO-generating loop”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How are NO and methemoglobin produced during sepsis?, Troia et al, 2020, Vet Front

A

Inflammatory cytokines and bacterial lipopolysaccharides in sepsis activate endothelial cells
and stimulate the production of an inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). As a result, nitric oxide
(NO) is produced, contributing to vasodilation and distributive shock. NO acts as a cytostatic and cytotoxic molecule against microorganisms and host cells, and interacts with hemoglobin forming methemoglobin and nitrates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does NO in sepsis exacerbate signs of septic shock/ cause septic shock?, Troia et al, 2020, Vet Front

A

No is contributing to vasodilation and distributive shock. NO acts as a cytostatic and cytotoxic molecule against microorganisms and host cells

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the clinical signs of methemoglobinemia? Troia et al, 2020, Vet Front

A

Methemoglobin is unable to bind oxygen, and
its overproduction leads to impaired aerobic cellular metabolism, hypoxia, chocolate-brown colored blood and mucous membranes, cyanosis, and death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you measure methemoglobin and what is its reference interval? Troia et al, 2020, Vet Front

A

with a co-oximeter
cited references: normal methemoglobin concentrations are usually kept <0.5–3% of total hemoglobin in humans and dogs
reference interval used for study: < 2.2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What toxins are known to cause methemoglobinemia in small animal patients? Troia et al, 2020, Vet Front

A

toxicants or chemicals able to induce hemoglobin oxidation (e.g., aniline, sulfonamides, nitrates, acetaminophen, hydroxicarbamide, tetracaine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what three subgroups of septic shock are characterized in humans and small animals? Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet

A
  • vasoplegic shock
  • cryptic shock
  • dysoxic shock
    *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Classification of Septic Shock Phenotypes Based on the Presence of Hypotension and Hyperlactatemia in Cats, Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet

A
  • Cats with dysoxic shock had significantly higher APPLEfast and APPLEfull scores compared to vasoplegic and cryptic shock.
  • Mortality rates were not significantly different among cryptic (57%), dysoxic (65%) and vasoplegic shock (91%)
  • MODS occurrence was significantly lower in cats with cryptic shock (57%) compared to patients affected by dysoxic (94%) and vasoplegic (100%) shock.
  • Septic shock in cats defines a subset of patients with greater disease severity, organ dysfunction and mortality compared to uncomplicated sepsis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is dysoxic shock (subgroup septic shock)? Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet

A

patients with hyperlactatemia and hypotension requiring vasopressors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is cryptic shock (subgroup septic shock)?

A

patients with occult hypotension, characterized by hyperlactatemia without hypotension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is vasoplegic shock (subgroup septic shock)?

A

patients with hypotension requiring prolonged vasopressor therapy but without developing hyperlactatemia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Sepsi-3 definition of “Septic Shock” Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet

A

According to the Third International Consensus Definition Sepsis-3:

septic shock is defined as a subset of sepsis in which particularly profound circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than with sepsis alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the definition of septic shock in small animals? Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet

A

in small animals, septic shock is defined as a state of fluid-refractory hypotension requiring vasopressor support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How did mortality rates and length of hospitalization differ between cats in cryptic, dysoxic, or vasoplegic septic shock? Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet Sci

A

they were not significantly different, but mortality trended upwards from cryptic (57%), to dysoxic (65%), and to vasoplegic (91%) shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How did the occurence of MODS differ between cats with either cryptic, dysoxic, or vasoplegic septic shock?

Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet Sci

A

patients with cryptic (57%) shock were significantly less likely to develop MODS than dysoxic and vasoplegic shock patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How did risk of mortality and occurence of MODS differ between cats in septic shock vs uncomplicated sepsis and 2/4 SIRS criteria vs 0/4 SIRS criteria?

Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet Sci

A
  • Cats with septic shock had a significantly higher frequency of MODS (91% vs. 28%, P < 0.0001) and a significantly higher mortality rate (73% vs. 43%, P = 0.0085) than cats with uncomplicated sepsis.
  • patients presenting with at least 2/4 SIRS criteria had significantly higher frequency of MODS (76% vs. 24%, P = 0.022) and mortality (67% vs. 36%, P = 0.01) compared to those not fulfilling the feline SIRS criteria
26
Q

What parameters were associated with nonsurvival in septic shock in Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet Sci?

A

Non-survivors had significantly lower

  • body temperature
  • BCS
  • hematocrit
  • lymphocyte count
  • serum albumin compared to survivors.

Non-survivors had significantly higher:

  • circulating methemoglobin
  • serum bilirubin
  • serum urea
  • activated partial thromboplastin time
  • APPLEfast score
27
Q

What is the prognostic utility of lactate concentration in cats according to the current literature? Troia et al, 2021 Front Vet Sci

A

The prognostic utility of lactate concentrations in cats appears unclear according to the available literature

28
Q

What is SAA marker? Troia et al, 2021, Front Vet Sci

A

Serum amyloid A (SAA), a major feline acute phase protein, shown to be an excellent marker for systemic inflammation in cats

29
Q

What are the 4 cateogories for SIRS identification and what is the cutoff to identify SIRS? Kleinbart et al, 2017, JAVMA

A

It is generally accepted that a diagnosis of SIRS can be made on the basis of manifestation of ≥ 2 of the following 4 conditions:

  • body temperature outside of the RI;
  • heart rate outside of the RI;
  • tachypnea or hyperventilation, indicated by decreased Paco2;
  • and leukocytosis, leukopenia, or band neutrophil fraction > 5%
30
Q

what hemostatis parameters were signifcantly altered in spetic cats in Kleibart et al, 2017, JAVMA?

A
  • increased aPTT time
  • decreased protein C activity
  • increased D-dimer concentration
31
Q

nonregenerative anemia was relatively common (29%) in septic cats in Kleibart et al, 2017, JAVMA. What possible underlying causes are suggested?

A

mostly likely due to inflammation, possibly including

  • low-grade hemolysis,
  • oxidative damage,
  • inflammation-associated disruption of iron metabolism,
  • decreased RBC life span,
  • inadequate erythropoietin production,
  • and insufficient bone marrow response to erythropoietin
32
Q

metarubricytosis was relatively common (35%) in septic cats in Kleibart et al, 2017, JAVMA. What is the proposed underlying cause for metarubricytosis in sepsis?

A

metarubricytosis (= nucleated RBCs) might have been pathological and possibly attributable to blood-bone marrow barrier disruption, which can be associated with:

  • inflammation
  • infection
  • necrosis
  • hypoxia
  • thrombosis
  • infarction
  • hyperthermia
33
Q

what electrolyte derangements were common in septic cats in Kleinbart et al, 2017, JAVMA?

A
  • hyponatremia, accompanied by hypochloremia
  • hypocalcemia
34
Q

hypalbuminemia (47%) and hypoproteinemia (73%) was common in septic cats in Kleinbart et al, 2017, JAVMA. What underlying causes does the author propose?

A

Hypoalbuminemia was attributed to:

  • increased loss,
  • malnutrition,
  • increased capillary permeability and leakage,
  • hepatic dysfunction,
  • decreased production caused by the acute phase response,
  • loss into effusions,
  • antidiuretic hormone activation-related dilutional effects
35
Q

hyperbilirubinemia was shown in 55% of septic cats in Kleibart et al, 2017, JAVMA. What is the proposed underlying cause and how does this differ from studies on humans and dogs?

A
  • low-grade hemolysis might be the cause for the hyperbilirubinemia in these septic cats
  • sepsis-induced cholestasis has been described in dogs and humans –> low ALP and GGT in this population of cats was not indicative of cholestasis
  • hepatpcellular damage also less likely because ALT was typically within RI in this population
36
Q

high serum CK and AST was common in cats in Kleinbart et al, 2017, JAVMA. What is the proposed underlying cause?

A

muscle damage

  • possibly due to muscle ischemia, hypotension, shock, and hypoxia leading to rhabdomyolysis-like states in some cats,
  • whereas in cats with bite wounds and cellulitis, direct muscle damage, trauma, and infection were likely more important cause
37
Q

Clinical, laboratory, and hemostatic findings in cats with naturally occurring sepsis, Kleinbart et al, 2017, JAVMA

A
  • novel findings included metarubricytosis, hypertriglyceridemia, high circulating muscle enzyme activity
  • confirmed: hemostasis derangements, hypoalbuminemia/hypoproteinemia, hyponatremia, hypochloremia, hypocalcemia, hyperbilirubinemia
  • no clinicopathologic findings were significantly associated with deat
38
Q

Comparison of continuous arterial pressure waveform analysis with the lithium dilution technique to monitor cardiac output in conscious dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Duffy et al, 2009, AJVR

A

there is poor agreement between CO measurements via pulseCO and LiDCO methods, indicating that PulseCO method does not accurately track changes in CO in conscious critically ill dogs over time

39
Q

What is the Cardiac Index, and how is it superior to CO? Duffy et al, 2009, AJVR

A

Cardiac index is the CO indexed to BSA (body surface area) and is a more accurate value for comparing CO in animals of varying sizes.

40
Q

methematically the relationship between blood flow and arterial pressure requires reference to … ? Duffy et al, 2009, AJVR

A

… vascular resistance

41
Q

How does LiDCO work for cardiac output measurements?Duffy et al, 2009, AJVR

A

uses indicator-dilution technique to define CO, with lithium chloride used as the indicator

42
Q

How does pulseCO work for cardiac output measurements? Duffy et al, 2009, AJVR

A

The PulseCOb is a beat-to-beat CO monitor that calculates SV from the arterial pressure waveform by use of an autocorrelation algorithm

43
Q

List at least 3 possible methods of measuring CO in small animals

Duffy et al, 2009, AJVR

A
  • thermodilution
  • LiDCO
  • pulseCO
  • magnetic flowmetry
  • indocyanine dilution
  • partial carbon dioxide rebreathing
  • transesophageal or transthoracic continuous wave Doppler ultrasonography
  • thoracic bioimpedance
44
Q

Where are the alpha-adrenergic receptors located?

Silverstein & Beer, 2015, JVECC

A
  • pre- and postsynaptic regions of sympathetic nerve endings on smooth muscles
  • myocardium (but less than smooth muscles)
45
Q

what is the effect of stimulation of alpha-adrenergic receptors?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

stimulation vascular muscles –> vasoconstriction and increased blood pressure

stimulation myocardium –> slower onset, prolonged increased inotropy

46
Q

Where are the beta-adrenergic receptors located?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A
  • myocardium
  • peripheral vascular and bronchial smooth muscles
47
Q

What effects does stimulation of the beta-adrenergic receptors have?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A
  • stimulation myocardium –> positive inotropic and chronotropic effects
  • stimulation of vascular and bronchial smooth muscles –> relaxation
  • stimulation –> increased splanchnic and microcirculatory perfusion
48
Q

Where are the dopamine receptors located?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

located in smooth muscles of renal, coronary, splanchnic and cerebrovascular beds

49
Q

What effect does stimulation of the dopamine receptors have? Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

vasolidation (dilates the renal, mesenteric, coronary, and intracerebral vascular beds)

50
Q

What are the adverse effects of beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A
  • arrhythmias
  • cellular modification increasing energy requirements
  • lactate production
  • immunosuppression (T cell and monocyte inhibition, reduced cytokine production)
51
Q

Why could it be detrimental to only stimulate alpha-adrenergic recptors and name an example of a pure alpha-agonist?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

sole alpha-adrenergic receptor stimulation would lead to vasoconstriction with not enough increase in heart rate and contractility to work against the increased afterload –> cardiac output would subsequently decrease

52
Q

How does current literature compare norepinephrine and dopamine?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A
  • some human trials found that dopamine improved myocardial contractility more than norepinephrine, others didn’t show that controversal
  • incidence of tachyarrhythmias higher in people receiving dopamine
  • several studies showed worse outcome in people receiving dopamine over norepinephrine, but differences often slight and not certain it can be extrapolated from human to veterinary medicine
  • prospective research is currently conducted to assess difference in dogs and cats
53
Q

How does current literature compare norepinephrine to epinephrine?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A
  • higher doses of epi needed to achieve higher cardiac index and heart rate compared with norepi
  • epi associated with elevated HR and serum lactate, decreased splanchnic perfusion for up to 48 hours in people
  • epi more likely to cause tachyarrhythmias
  • no difference in adverse events or outcome in 2 human studies
  • no conclusive evidence as to which one is better –> still controversial
54
Q

How does vasopressin cause vasoconstriction?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

activates V1 receptor –> increased IC Ca via phosphatidylinositol-bisphosphonate cascade –> constriction of vascular smooth muscles

55
Q

How does vasopressin not lead to decreased CO despite causing vasoconstriction?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

increased systemic vascular resistance –> increased afterload –> BUT no decreased cardiac output observed, possibly due to increased coronary blood flow

56
Q

What is a proposed effect that prolonged hypotension has on vasopressin?

Silverstein and Beer, 2015, JVECC

A

prolonged hypotension –> may lead to depletion of endogenous vasopressin

57
Q
A
58
Q
A
59
Q
A
60
Q
A
61
Q
A
62
Q
A