Separation of national powers/ Exec powers Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does Youngstown demonstrate?

A

case sets out framework for understanding presidential power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 categories for executive power

A
  1. zenith
  2. twilight zone
  3. lowest ebb
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

zenith

A

acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization, presumption of validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

twilight zone

A

murky area of fact and case specific situation, Congressional silence, inherent power?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

lowest ebb

A

acts against express will of C

only permissible where C has acted unconst.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Presidential power question

A
  1. under which category does it fall
  2. what other issues present themselves
    a. non-delegation
    b. bicameralism
    c. presentment
    d. appointments or removals
  3. Q concerning state power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where are the Pres’s enumerated powers found?

A

Art. II

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What powers does the Pres have?

A

To execute, administer, and enforce laws passed by C.
Commander in chief, negotiate treaties.
To ensure laws are adequately enforced
Otherwise, must justify actions through provisions in const.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Dames and Moore . Regan do?

A

Case states that 3 categories of pres power are too oversimplified. Power is on a continuum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nondelegation doctrine

A

C cannot give away too much authority. Legislatuve power belongs to C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where is the nondelegation doctrine found?

A

Art I, §1, cl. 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why would C want to delegate powers?

A

lack of time
lack of expertise
allow flexibility in regulation
buck-passing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Whitman v. American Trucking Association demonstrate?

A

Case says if a nondelegation problem exists, then only C can remedy through a more specific statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

intelligible principle

A

law must guide those charged w/ administering the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

standard for C’s delegation of power

A

Ct very deferential
the greater the power delegated, the more specificity required
only been overturned twice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

legislative veto

A

C reservation of power to veto exec action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Are legislative vetoes const.?

A

No. Violate exec power. Congressional acts require bicameralism and presentment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

presentment clause

A

every bill must be presented to Pres befre becoming law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Where is the presentment clause found?

A

Art I §7, cl 2 & 3

20
Q

Where is the bicameralism requirement found?

A

Art. I §7, cl 2

21
Q

bicameralism

A

every legislative act must pass through both House and Senate

22
Q

When can C act unilaterally?

A

impeachment
advice/ consent of pres appointments
ratifying treaties

23
Q

What can C do instead of legislative veto?

A
reject agency decisions through new laws
enact more detailed legislation
conduct oversight hearings
include susnset provisions
threaten budget reductions
political--call press conferences
24
Q

What did Clinton v. NY show?

A

case determined line item vetoes are unconstit.

25
Q

What did Spreitsma v. Mercury Marine do?

A

Case showed where C silent on an issue, even if they considered the issue, there is no preemption. Expresio unis does not apply

26
Q

Where is the power to appoint fed officers found?

A

Art II, §2, cl 2

27
Q

Who has the power to appoint officers?

A

Pres nominates, Senate gives advice and consent

28
Q

Who can’t C appoint?

A

any person who executes federal law (inferior or superior)

29
Q

What did Freytag and Buckley demonstrate?

A

Cases outlined who is an officer

30
Q

Who is an officer?

A

appointee who exercises significant discretion in the enforcement of fed law

31
Q

What power does an officer have?

A

More than advisory power or ministerial duties. More than minimis or tirivial. Not members of legislature

32
Q

Line item veto

A

vetoing specific items within a larger statute

33
Q

Why is a line item veto unconst.

A

Gives pres power to veto provisions after bill has become law

34
Q

What can Pres do instead of line item veto?

A

Presidential signing statement

35
Q

Presidential signing statement

A

Pres alerts public that he will not enforce a certain provision or that he believes it to be unconst

36
Q

Superior or inferior officer?

A
  1. Subject to removal by higher exec branch?
  2. empowered to perform limited duties or more brad?
  3. Limited SMJ?
  4. Limited tenure?
37
Q

What is a head of department?

A

Like a cabinet-level dept. Superior officer

38
Q

What positions can C delegate for departments to appoint?

A

inferior officers, not superior

39
Q

Examples of “departments”

A

Treasury. Defense, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor

40
Q

Who can appoint inferior officers?

A

C decides who will appoint them: Pres alone, Cts of Law, or Heads of Dept

41
Q

Who are heads of depts?

A

all heads of cabinent-level depts and agencies. Not lesser bureaus, commission, or regional offices

42
Q

Who are cts of law?

A

At least Art I and Art III cts. Freytag leaves unclear

43
Q

Where is the Appointment Clause found?

A

Art. II, §2, cl. 2

44
Q

Is a removal limitation const.?

A

Does the restriction of removal interfere with the pres doing his job?

45
Q

What did Morrison v. Olsen do?

A

Set out a somewhat ambiguous standard that if a restriction for removal is of such a nature that it impedes the Pres’s ability to perform his Const. duty

46
Q

How to determine if a removal limitation impede’s Pres’s ability to perform his Const. duty

A
  1. siginificance of the office
    a. scope of duties, breadth of officers jx, length of tenure
  2. nature of the restriction
    a. who removes officer, for what causes
47
Q

What did Humphry’s Executory decide?

A

C may limit removal of officers of independent agencies but not of cabinet level officials