Sentencing Flashcards
1
Q
Aims of sentencing
A
- when judges or magistrates have to pass a sentence they will not only look at the sentences available, they will also have to decide what they are trying to achieve but the punishment they give. Section 142 of the criminal justice act 2003 sets out the purposes of sentencing for those aged 18 and over saying that a court must have regarded to:
- the punishment of offenders
- the reduction of crime
- the reform and rehabilitation of offenders
- the protection of the public
- the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences
- in addition to the purposes of sentencing given in the 2003 act, denunciation of crime is also recognised as an aim of sentencing.
2
Q
Retribution/punishment
A
- retribution - imposing a punishment because the offender has broken the law
- retribution is based on the idea of punishment. The offender deserves punishment for his acts. This aim of sentencing does not seek to reduce crime or alter the offenders future behaviour. A judge using this aim is only concerned with the offence that was committed and making sure that the sentence given is in proportion to that offence
3
Q
Traiff sentences
A
- retribution, today is based more on the idea that each offence should have a certain tariff or level of sentencing. The sentencing council produces guidelines for all the main categories of offence. Judges have to take notice of these guidelines and should not normally give a lower sentence than the minimum set out in the guidelines
4
Q
Deterrence
A
- deterrence - giving a punishment aimed at putting off the defendant from reoffending because of fear of punishment or preventing other potential offenders from committing similar crimes
- this can be individual deterrence to general deterrence. Individual deterrence is intended to ensure that the offended does not reoffend, through fear of future punishment. General deterrence is aimed at preventing other potential offenders from committing crimes. Both are aimed at reducing future levels of crime
5
Q
Individual deterrence
A
- there are several penalties that can be imposed with the aim of deterring the individual offender from committing similar crimes in the future. These include a prison sentence, a suspended sentence or a heavy fine. However prison does not appear to deter as about 55% of adult prisoners reoffend within two years of release. With young offenders, custodial sentences have even less of a deterrent effect. Over 70% of young offenders given a custodial sentence reoffend within two years.
6
Q
General deterrence
A
- the value of this is even more doubtful as potential offenders are rarely deterred by severe sentences passed on others. However, the courts do occasionally resort to making an example of an offender in order to warn other potential offenders of the type of punishment they face
7
Q
Rehabilitation
A
- trying to alter the offenders behaviour so that he will conform to community norms and not offend in future
- under this aim of sentencing the main aim of the penalty is to reform the offender and rehabilitate him into society. It is a forward looking aim, with the hope that the offenders behaviour will be altered by the penalty imposed, so that he will bit offended in the future
8
Q
Reformation
A
- trying to reform the offenders behaviour so that he will not reoffend in future
- reformation is a very important element in the sentencing philosophy for young offenders, but is is also used for some adult offenders. The court will be given information about the defendants background, usually through a pre sentence report prepared by the probation service. Where relevant, the court will consider other factors, such as school reports, job prospects, or medical problems.
- offenders will usually be given a community order with various requirements aimed at rehabilitating them
9
Q
Protection of the public
A
- the public needs to be protected from dangerous offenders. For this reason life imprisonment or a long term of imprisonment is given to those who commit murder or other violent or serious sexual offences.
- the criminal justice act 2003 introduced a provision for serious offences that where the court is of the opinion that there is a significant risk to members of the public of serious harm being caused by the defendant in future, the court must send the defendant to prison for the protection of the public.
- for less serious offences there are other ways in which the public can be protected. E.g, dangerous drivers are disqualified from driving.
- another method of protecting the public is to impose a curfew order on the offender ordering him to remain at home for certain times of the day or night which can be monitored by an electronic tag
10
Q
Reparation
A
- where an offender compensates the victim or society for the offending behaviour
- this is aimed at compensating the victim of the crime, usually by ordering the offender to pay a sum of money to the victim to make restitution, e.g, returning stolen property to its rightful owner. The courts are required to consider ordering compensation to the victim of a crime, in addition to any other penalty they may think appropriate. There are also projects to bring offenders and victims together, so that the offenders may make direct reparation
- the concept also includes making reparation to society as a whole. This can be seen mainly in the use of unpaid work requirements where offenders are required to do so many hours work on a community project under the supervision of the probation service
11
Q
Denunciation
A
- expressing society’s disapproval of an offenders behaviour
- this is society expressing its disapproval of criminal activity. A sentence should indicate both to the offender and to other people that society condemns certain types of behaviour. It shows people that justice is being done
- denunciation also reinforces the moral boundaries of acceptable conduct and can mould societies views on the criminality of particular conduct
12
Q
Factors in sentencing
A
- when deciding what sentence to pass on a defendant the courts consider the following matters:
- the offence
- sentencing guidelines
- the offenders background
13
Q
Aggravating factors in sentencing
A
- consider how serious the crime was.
- the criminal justice act 2003 goes on to give certain factors making an offences more serious. These are:
- pervious convictions for offences of a similar nature or relevant to the present offence
- the fact that the defendant was on bail when he committed the offence
- racial or religious hostility being involved in the offence
- hostility to disability or sexual orientation being involved in the offences
- as well as these points in the criminal justice act 2003, there are also other factors which are regarded as aggravating features for specific offences. E.g, where the defendant has committed an assault, aggravating features include
- the offender being part of a group attacking the victim
- a particularly vulnerable victim
- a victim serving the public
- the fact that the assault was premeditated
- where there is an aggravating factors the court will pass a more serve sentence that it would normally given
14
Q
Mitigating factors available in sentencing
A
- a mitigating factors is one which allows the court to give a lighter sentence than would normally be given. If the offender co operates with the police, e.g, identifying others involved in the crime, then the court can take this into account when deciding sentence
- other factors taken into account in mitigation include:
- mental illness of defendant
- physical illness of defendant
- the fact that a defendant has no previous convictions
- evidence of genuine remorse
15
Q
Reduction in the sentence for a guilty plea
A
- there will also be a reduction in sentence for a guilty plea, particularly where the defendant made that plea early in the proceedings. The sentencing council guidelines on this are that the reduction for a guilty plea at first reasonable opportunity should attract a reduction of up to one third, while a plea of guilty after the trial has started would only be given one tenth reduction. The amount of reduction is on a sliding scale.
- the only exception is where the evidence is overwhelming and the defendants guilt is clear. In these circumstances, even if the defendant pleads guilty at the earliest possible opportunity, the judge need only give a 20% discount for that plea of guilty