Sentence Comprehension Flashcards
Give an example of a temporarily ambiguous sentence
“The man shot the dog with the collar”
What is the minimal attachment principle?
Involves, where grammatically possible, attaching an ambiguous phrase to a tree structure using the fewest possible nodes.
Give an example of a globally ambiguous sentence
“The cop shot the prisoner with the gun”
What is incremental sentence processing?
Words are incorporated into previous sentence structures from left to right.
What are the three main properties of the garden path model?
1) the modular model: initial syntactic information is not influenced by non-syntactic information such as plausibility.
Other information is then considered after the initial syntactic analysis
2) the serial model: only a single model is adopted at a time
3) the reanalysis model: difficulty occurs when the initial analysis is inconsistent with the information used later. This triggers reanalysis.
Describe ONE experiment which shows evidence for the garden path model.
Traxler et al (1998)
Two sentences:
1) the steak with the sauce that was tough didn’t win a prize
2) the steak with the sauce that was runny didn’t win a prize
Reading times for phrase one were longer as it violates late closure
What do constraint based models argue for over garden path theory?
Constraint based models argue that syntactic processing is not modular
What are the three properties of constraint based models?
1) Interactive models: all sources of information are used immediately and interact with each other
2) Parallel models: all analyses for a structure are activated in parallel. The stronger the support for an analysis, the higher it’s activation
3) Competition models: difficulty occurs when two or more analyses are equally activated.
What is the difference between when plausibility is used in constraint based models and the garden path model?
Constraint based models use plausibility immediately. The garden path model initially ignores plausibility.
What is referential theory?
It explains how discourse context may effect syntactic ambiguity resolution. It predicts that the interpretation which contains the fewest unsatisfied presuppositions is preferred.
Give an example of referential theory
“The criminal shot the cop with the pistol”
No sentential context is used. “With the pistol” implies more than one cop. No context to suggest this. Therefore an unsatisfied presupposition.
The VP attachment should be preferred, which attached “with the pistol” to shot and suggests only one cop. The presupposition is then satisfied.
What is a discourse presupposition?
An implicit assumption taken from written or spoken communication.
When do garden path theory and referential theory agree on processing?
When there is no context, both believe in late closure and minimal attachment
What is the attachment preference of the garden path model in a multi-referent context
VP attachment
When is the attachment preference of referential theory in a multi-referent context?
NP attachment preference