Semester 1 - Lecture Revision Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of research?

A

“a detailed study of a subject, especially in order to discover (new) information or reach a (new) understanding”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Difference between positivism and interpretivism?

A

Positivism, at its simplest, holds that so-called ‘positive’ knowledge is derived from empirical data - quantitative

Interpretivist research is concerned explicitly with generating understanding of the world - qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition of evidence-based medicine?

A

“The conscientious, explicit, and judicious development and use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the different ways health research may be used - think different levels of society?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are elements that one considers when making a clinical decision?

A

Different factors that go into make a plan/decision for patient treatment - not only scientific research - other pragmatical factors need to be considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some limitations to health research?

A

Some questions/areas more likely to be researched
1. Is the condition druggable?
2. Is the condition profitable?
3. Is it trendy?
4. Is it a political choice to focus on a particular condition?

In areas where there is evidence:
1. Study population may not match patient in front of you
2. Individuals may respond differently within study populations
3. Many patients have multiple conditions
4. Single studies may be over-interpreted
5. Adverse effects may take years to emerge
6. Statistical versus clinical significance - is statistical significance sufficient to warrant clinical significance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What questions are asked when conducting a population based health study?

A
  1. What conditions cause most morbidity?
  2. How many people have these conditions, who are they?
  3. What are the outcomes in a population?
  4. How good are our services?
  5. What services and interventions improve outcomes?
  6. How much does it all cost?
  7. What needs to change?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the three components of public health?

A

Three components of public health
1. Health improvement - Addressing preventable risk factors for disease
2. Health Protection - Addressing communicable diseases (primarily)
3. Healthcare improvement - Working with health services for population health

All of which is underpinned by health intelligence - research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What types of research can inform population health?

A
  1. Biomedical research
  2. Epidemiology
  3. Health services research
  4. Studies of behavioural, social and economic factors that affect health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Definition of evidence?

A

“one or more reasons for supporting a proposition about the natural or social world”

Pragmatically - what counts as evidence relates to what kinds of problems you want to address or questions you want to answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What should we keep in mind when thinking about when examining evidence?

A

Research is shaped by the researchers previous beliefs and views (power structers) - shapes the experimental design + the results that they are looking for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What evidence based tool did Edinburgh develop for delirium detection?

A

4 ‘A’s Test (4AT)

  1. Alertness
  2. 4AMT - recalling age, DOB, place and current year
  3. Attention
  4. Acute changes/fluctuating changes

Provies a score - allowing us to assess level of delirium

Tool improved delirium diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the limitations of evidence based medicine?

A
  1. How evidence is used - will it always be relevant to the case in front of you, how have the numbers/conclusions been generated and does the evidence come from a large or small study?
  2. Overstandardisation and control over clinical practice - limits clinicians ability to deal with patient idiosyncrasies/perspectives
  3. Difficulty getting evidence into clinical practice and policy - long arduous process
  4. How different values come to shape how and what forms of evidence are, or are not, taken up in the policymaking process.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are two barriers for people to access scientific articles/journals?

A
  1. Language - primary language is english
  2. Financial - subscriptions cost money
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is peer-review? What are the different ways that it can be done?

A

Peer-review - experts review

Note - not perfect as there are lots of examples/levels where bias can be introduced

Types
Double blind – authors don’t know reviewers (visa-versa)
Single blind – one group do not know about the other
Open – everyone knows everything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are pre-print repositories?

A

Pre-print repositories – articles are released before peer-review/journal acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are predatory journals?

A

Predatory Journals - accept papers for a fee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does the critical appraisal of articles entail?

A

“Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular context”.

Not about being negative - aim is to look for strengths and weaknesses and make a balanced decision about its usefulness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why is critical appraisal important?

A
  1. Lots of articles/reports on your subject of interest – you need to be able to decide which ones are most relevant and best quality.
  2. Not all studies are good quality, some have biases that affect interpretation of the findings.
  3. Basing decisions on evidence that is not reliable or trustworthy can have serious implications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When critiquing qualitative studies, what should you keep in mind?

A

Qualitative studies

Looking for detail on: sample diversity, recruitment approach (any bias) and analysis, limitations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When critiquing quantitative studies, what should you keep in mind?

A

Quantitative

Looking for detail on: sample type (probability - i.e. random, or non-probability – i.e. quota), sample size (is it representative or not, any bias), analysis, limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Provide a brief outline for the development of clinical guidelines.

A
  1. Guidelines construction - Different forms of evidence used to construct guidelines - Meta-analysis, systematic reviews and RCTs rated highly
    - Note - Sometimes some areas lack any evidence – clinical experience and recommendations are used when it is lacking
  2. Publication of guidelines and dissemination of information
  3. Guidelines under review - data collected and changes are implemented where appropriate.
  • Note - Guidelines are shaped by public involvement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the role of guidelines and who is normally responsible for creating them?

A

Guidelines help with diagnosis, management and treatment

Formed by governments or major professional organisations

Note - Guidelines inform clinical decisions – should not be used as set rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What are the moral principles governing governing ethical research?

A
  1. Ensuring respect for people and doing no harm.
  2. Recognising that participants are not a means to an end.
  3. Ensuring research is socially and/or medically valuable for participants and/or as part of a wider contribution to knowledge.
  4. Ensuring participants are cared for, particularly those who are marginalised, vulnerable, disempowered or disadvantaged.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are some practical ethical considerations when conducting research?

A
  1. Obtaining informed consent from potential research participants- can be difficult with specific groups - children, disabled, etc.
  2. Determining benefit.
  3. Minimising the risk of harmto participants - direct harm, harm of sharing the information, etc.
  4. Protecting privacy, anonymityandconfidentiality - Stripping the data of all personal and identifiable information
  5. Harms and benefits shared fairly - who is selected, who is excluded, are you excluding specific groups or are you using specific groups as they are more accessible?
26
Q

What is procedural ethics?

A

Different institutions have their own ethical guidelines – known as procedural ethics

27
Q

What is the difference between research ethics and integrity?

A

Responsible conduct of research - overarching

28
Q

What are the four principles of research integrity - European code?

A
  1. Reliability
  2. Honesty
  3. Respect
  4. Accountability
29
Q

Do drugs need to be tested on animals prior to human use?

A

Yes, drugs need to be tested on two animals prior to human use – legal requirement

30
Q

What are the conditions that must be met for research to be conducted on animals?

A
  1. The research cannot be done using non-animal methods
  2. The minimum number of animals will be used
  3. Dogs, cats or primates are only used when other species are not suitable
  4. Any discomfort or suffering is kept to a minimum by appropriate use of anaesthetics or pain killer
  5. The potential results are important enough to justify the use of animals (the harm-benefit analysis)
  6. Researchers and technicians conducting procedures have the necessary training, skills and experience
  7. Research premises have the necessary facilities to look after the animals properly
31
Q

What are the 3Rs for reducing animal suffering in research?

A
32
Q

How many licences do you need to conduct research?

A

Three licences – Licence of the place, project and person carrying out the research

Review bodies applicable to research in Edinburgh.. .

Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body – internal review body – looks at everyone involved

Home office – external body

33
Q

What are the different elements that should be present in a good hypothesis?

A

Example using the following hypothesis:
Aspirin is an effective treatment for headaches in humans

  1. Outcome - What are we measuring? What level of pain? For how long must symptoms have been present?
  2. Exposure - Clearly define exposure of interest – dose, frequency, method of administration
  3. Effective - How do we determine effectiveness? Reduction to what level of pain and how quickly? Side effects?
  4. Population - Which population we testing it on?

Takeaway - Be Specific

Overarching - Is this research question relevant – has it already been answered?

34
Q

What are the different steps involved in generating a hypothesis?

A
  1. Developing a Research Question - Gaps in knowledge, do they matter, can we formulate a testable hypothesis?
  2. Study design - Who is the hypothesis being tested on? How are we measuring? What type of study are we conducting?
  3. Analysis - Test the hypothesis against the data? It the hypothesis confirmed or denied? No data dredging (changing the research question so that you can get a positive answer)!
35
Q

Can research be conducted without an hypothesis?

A

Yes, when you have an open-ended question which you don’t have information available to predict/create a hypothesis - Research question is exploratory, so one does not predict the outcome

Inductive approach (data is collected to build a theory) rather than the deductive approach

Typically associated with quanlitative studies

Examples…
1. Research project exploring patients’ understandings and experiences of cancer genetic testing.
2. Research project exploring men’s experiences of chronic illness.

36
Q

What are the two main types/categories of questions when using an inductive approach?

A
  1. What questions (requiring description).
  2. How questions (concerned with process, change, interventions and outcomes) .
  3. Why questions (concerned with causes, reasons, relationships and activities) - associated with an deductive approach

Inductive approach is concerned with what and how questions, but is less useful for why questions.

37
Q

What types of research methods are used to study no-hypothesis research?

A

Qualitative methods are especially suitable due to their open ended and unstructured nature.

Examples of qualitative methods include -

  1. In-depth semi-structured interviews
  2. Observations of interactions
  3. Textual analysis (diaries, letters, newspaper materials etc).
  4. Survey
38
Q

What does the iterative research refer to (research without a hypothesis)?

A

Iterative approach - Throughout the course of any research project, the researcher may want to carry out further research and data collection to ‘test’ the theories they are generating - feedback

Data collected - theories generated - theory tested - repeat

“Weaving back and forth between data and theory”

39
Q

What is participatory research?

A

Fundamental principles are that the subjects of the research become involved as partners in the process of the enquiry, and that their knowledge and capabilities are respected and valued.

40
Q

What are the reasons for performing participatory research?

A
  1. Moral Value - Equality & Diversity agenda, vulnerability of participants, minimise/eliminate abuse.
  2. Scientific Value - Insights into hard-to-reach populations, minimizing research risks, translation & implementation (research is designed in accordance/with people’s views) and it is commonly one of the funder requirements
  3. Personal - provides motivation, creates friendships, provides personal insight and allows for mutual learning.
41
Q

What is qualitative research?

A

Qualitative research - explores a particular area, collect data and generate ideas and hypotheses from these data largely through what is known as inductive reasoning

Collect data - generate hypotheses

Data is normally non-numerical

42
Q

What are the three main methods used in qualitative research?

A
  1. Observations - can be overt or covert (overt more acceptable) - observations are then coded and analyzed
  2. Interviews - Structured, semi-structured and unstructured.
  3. Documentary analysis - Lots of different types of documents – guidelines, legislation, etc. - e.g. looking at how health guideline changed over time.
43
Q

What does qualitative coding of data refer to?

A

Qualitative coding is a process of systematically categorizing excerpts in your qualitative data in order to find themes and patterns.

44
Q

What is reflexivity?

A

When performing qualitiative research we use ourselves as tools to perform research, we as individuals have our own background and views. This facilitates qualitative research but eliminates the objectivity from the research, as we are not bystanders but rather actively involved in the process.

Hence, reflexivity refers to our ability of viewing and analyzing our own preconceptions and understanding its potential influence

Can influence multiple levels of the research process - research question generation, collecting data, analysis of data, etc.

Hence, one must reflect on our own background, education, beleifs and values, and think about the implications this may have.

45
Q

What is epidemiology?

A

Epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of disease in a population

Broadly, epidemiological activity is based around 3 main areas:
a) Simple descriptions of disease patterns
b) Identification of disease-causing factors
c) Measuring the effectiveness of health care or public health interventions.

46
Q

What is the difference between a descriptive and analytical apporach in epidemiological research?

A

Descriptive - Usually focus on issues related to “person”, “time” and “place” - describing/identifying patterns
For example…
1. Person: who is affected?
2. Time: when did the disease event occur?
3. Place: where did the disease event occur?

Analytic - trying to understand something about the underlying relationship between one or more “exposures” or “risk factors” and a specific outcome

Does exposure/risk factor ‘X’, increase the liklihood of ‘Y’ occuring.

Exposure - can be fixed/non-modifiable factors, modifiable risk factors or interventions (health education, drug, etc.)

Outcome - can be negative or positive - death, disease status, degree of disability, length of survival or survival, risk reduction, satisfaction, quality of life

47
Q

What do we call an exposure that increase risk of diease? What do we call an exposure that decreases risk of diease?

A

An exposure that increases the risk of disease is often referred to as a risk factor.

An exposure that decreases the risk of disease is referred to as a protective factor.

48
Q

What are the two broad categories of study designs used by epidemiologists?

A
49
Q

What is the difference between incidence and prevalence?

A

Ways of measuring disease frequency

Prevalence - proportion of a population with disease at one time point - the number of cases divided by the size of the population

Incidence - new cases in a population over a specified time period.

Note - incidence is reported as number of new cases per person-years at risk

Person-years at risk is calculated by multiplying length of time (specified time period) by the current population.

50
Q

What are the following epidemiological study types and what are they used for?
a) cross-sectional study
b) Prospective/Co-hort study
c) Retrospective/case-control study

A
  1. Cross-sectional study- looking at the prevalance at a specific time period - taking a snapshot - e.g. relationship between levels of physical activity (PA) and diabetes in scotland in 2010 or 2019
  2. Prospective/Co-hort study - follow a sample of people selected and examine whether the exposure ‘X’ influences the likelihood of ‘Y’ over this time period
    Example - follow a sample of people in 2010 with known PA levels all the way through to 2019, at which time we would check to see whether they had been diagnosed with diabetes over that follow-up period.
  3. Retrospective/case-control study - sample a group of participants with a conditon and a group without, and establish the levels of the ‘exposure’ they encountered/experienced over a specified time period. Then by comparing the two groups, we can evaluate the impact of the exposure/risk factor
    Example - one group of people known to have diabetes plus a second sample of individuals known to be diabetes-free (controls). We would then look backwards in time to establish what their PA levels had been during the previous decade.
51
Q

What is one advantage and disadvantage of conducting a retrospective/case-control study?

A

Advantage - Usually quicker to execute and more logistically straightforward than a cohort design

Disadvantage - raises more uncertainties around the quality of the exposure or risk factor data

52
Q

What is relative risk and odds ratio? What are they used for?

A

In both cohort and case-control studies, we would usually wish to have some form of numerical measure of the association between the exposure and outcome of interest

Cohort studies - we typically measure association via the relative risk, which is a ratio of the incidence of the outcome in one exposure group relative to the incidence of outcome in the other exposure group.

Case-control study - use the Odds Ratio, which compares the odds of an outcome in one exposure group relative to the other

53
Q

What are three sources of error in epidemiological studies?

A
  1. Chance - Random Variation - due to sampling variation and measurement error
    - Address this issue with statistical interference
  2. Bias (systematic error) - induced by study design or conduct - caused by selection bias (not representative cohort), measurment bias (different groupss treated in different ways) and recall bias (can’t remeber or exaggerating?)
    - Bias is systematic error (or variation) in results away from the true population relationship
  3. Confounding - detection of an association between exposure and outcome that is an artefact of a third variable (called a confounder) being strongly associated individually with both of the exposure and outcome variables - removes casaulity

Confounding problems can be dealth with at the design stage (e.g. randomising participants to interventions) but is more commonly dealth with at the analysis stage (stratifying groups or introducing cofounder in the multifactoral statistical model).

54
Q

Do epidemiological studies provide casual relationships?

A

Epidemiological work does not necessarily demonstrate causation between the variables we investigate but rather association.

55
Q

What is a cohort study?

A

Study whereby a designated group of individuals are followed or traced over a period of time.

Concept
1. Define a population of interest
2. Sample from population of interest
3. Group people in terms of whether they have been exposed to the exposure of interest or not.
4. Follow these groups over time to see whether our outcome of interest develops

56
Q

What can cohort studies be used for?

A
  1. Determining impact of an exposure on an outcome
    or
  2. Examining the incidence of an outcome over time

Remember - correlation does not equal casauton

57
Q

What are complex interventions?

A

Interventions with several interacting components

Example - telemonitoring in COPD - people using household monitoring kits, which feeds back information that is monitored - help identify patients with COPD deterioration/exacerbation

Several interacting componenets - monitoring kit, patients using kit, monitoring and clinical support.

58
Q

What are the differen stages for developing and testing complex interventions?

A
59
Q

What is a randomised control trial (RCT)?

A

A study in which a number of similar people are randomly assigned to 2 (or more) groups to test a specific drug, treatment or other intervention.
One group (the experimental group) has the intervention being tested, the other (the comparator or control group) has an alternative intervention, a dummy intervention (placebo) or no intervention at all.

The groups are followed up to see how effective the experimental intervention was. Outcomes are measured at specific times and any difference in response between the groups is assessed statistically. This method is also used to reduce bias.

Randomization is central to RCTs as it balances participant characteristics (both observed and unobserved) between the groups allowing attribution of any differences in outcome to the study intervention.

60
Q

What is a literature review? What is a systematic review? What is a meta-analysis? How are they different?

A

Literature review - usually answer broad and descriptive research questions - provide an overview of the scientific evidence in a field of research

Systematic review - is a detailed, systematic and transparent means of gathering, appraising and synthesising evidence to answer a well-defined question.

Meta-analysis - involves combining numerical data from multiple separate studies in order to come to an answer to a well defined question.

61
Q

What is a Cochrane review?

A

A Cochrane Review is a systematic review of research in health care and health policy that is published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - High level of credibility