Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Cognitive NeuroPsych > Semantic System > Flashcards

Semantic System Flashcards

1
Q

What is Implicit / non-declarative memory?

A

What is Implicit / non-declarative memory

  • Information that you know, but you cant verbalize out loud
  • Includes:
    • Emotional: How emotional states
    • Procedural: How you do things; eg, driving a car
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Explicit / Declarative memory?

A

Explicit / Declarative memory

  • Information that can be verbalized
    • Semantic: what; e.g. facts
    • Episodic: when information occurred; when you learnt that fact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between autobiographical and semantic memory?

A

Difference between autobiographical and semantic memory

  • Autobiographical Memory
    • Personal information
    • Specific Events
  • Semantic Memory
    • Knowledge about the world
      • How you know how to use tools, objects, cook
    • Facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is semantic memory important?

A

Most everyday cognitive activities rely on semantic memory…

  • How to recognise and use objects
  • Represent concepts in the form of language
  • Fluid and flexible knowledge manipulation, association and combination of concepts
  • Reasoning, planning the future or remembering the past doesn’t occur without conceptual content
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by category specific impairment?

A

What is meant by category specific impairment?

  • A patient is unable to name specific categories of objects
    • E.g. unable to name body parts, but they are fine at categorizing other objects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Picture Naming Task?

A

Picture Naming Task

Task: say line drawings out loud

  • includes animals, fruits/vegtables, artefacts

Picture naming task for pictures from standardised set that were matched for familiarity and frequency and visual complexity and familiarity

  • Used to test category specific impairments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Sound Identification Task?

A

Sound Identification Task

  • Task: you get sound characteristics and you need to name what is making the sound;
    • e.g. dog barking, or car horn

Used to test category specific impairments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Object Decision Task?

A

Object Decision Task

  • Task: presented with objects that are either real or two other objects put together
    • decide if the object is real of not

Used to test category specific impairments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Parts Decision Task?

A

Parts Decision Task

  • Task: given a picture of a body and a number of heads
    • Which head goes with the body

used to test category specific impairments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Visual Processing?

A

Visual Processing

  • visual matching and face recognition tasks

used to test category specific impairments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Central Attribute Judgement Task?

A

Central Attribute Judgement Task

  • Task: asks questions that tap into…
  1. visual/perceptual features
    • E.g. does a cow have a mane? Does a whale have a large tail fin?
  2. And functional/associative features
    • Does a whale fly? Does an eagle lay eggs?

used to test category specific impairments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Processing Difficulty Hypothesis?

A

Early researchers were confused by why people were much poorer at categorizing living apposed to non-living things

  • Task differences could be the result of…
  • Familiarity (how familiar people are with a word/object)
    • People arent as familiar of living things
  • Frequency (how often the word/object appears in usage)
    • People don’t see living things as frequently
  • Visual complexity
    • Living things are more visually complex than non-living
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Neural structure principle?

A

Explains how semantic knowledge is organised/structured.

Neural structure principle – conceptual knowledge is organised based on neurally specific areas (a link between mind and brain - isomorphism) that store categorical information (e.g living things, non-living things)

  • These are known as Modality specific theories, which includes…
    • Sensory/Functional Theory
    • Domain Specific Hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is isomorphism?

A

a link between mind and brain - isomorphism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Correlated structure principle?

A

Explains how semantic knowledge is organised/structured.

Correlated structure principle – conceptual knowledge (semantic system) is organized in the brain based on the statistical cooccurrence of different features of objects. Brain damage results in category specific impairments for correlated features; due to the inter relationship between the features

  • These are known as Statistical Cooccurrence, which includes…
    • Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis (OUCH)
    • Conceptual-Structural Account
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Sensory/Functional Theory?

A

Theory of Semantic memory

Adheres to neural-structure principle

Semantic knowledge is organized into perceptual (sensory) and non-perceptual (functional) information

  • Thus there are two dimensions…
    • Visual/Perceptual characteristics (auditory, visual, tactile)
      • Naming living things
    • Functional/Associative characteristics (functions of objects and associated objects)
      • Naming non-living things

Example

  • describe characteristics of an apple
    • Would say things about
      • Colour
      • How it tastes
      • How it smells

Description of the apple is consistent with the notion of living things - Visual/perceptual representation

  • Describe characteristic of a hammer
    • Would say things about
      • Function
      • Associates (hammer and nail)
      • Uses

Description of the hammer would be consistent with non-living things - functional/associative information representation

17
Q

What are the Predictions of Sensory/Functional Theory?

  • and are these predictions supported?
A

Prediction 1: Recognition of all living things depends on representations in the same semantic sub-system (visual/ perceptual) therefore….

  • Thus, there should not be a patient who has a specific category deficits within the living things

Prediction 2: Patients with category specific deficits (e.g. living vs. non-living) will also have disproportionate deficits for the modality or type of information tapped into via the impaired category (e.g. functional/associative verse visual/perceptual)

  • e.g. If you have an impairment for living things, you will also have problems providing information or knowledge about visual/perceptual characteristic

Prediction 3: Patients with a deficit for visual/ perceptual knowledge or functional/ associative knowledge should show a categorical deficit that is most dependent on that type of knowledge

  • impaired visual/ perceptual knowledge = impairment for living things
  • impaired functional/ associative knowledge = impairment for non-living things

However, these predicitons are not supported

18
Q

What is the Domain-Specific Hypothesis?

A

Theory of Semantic memory

neural-structure principle

Domain-Specific Hypothesis

  • Assumes evolutionary pressures resulted in specialised and functionally distinct neural circuits that process perceptually and conceptually distinct categories of objects/information
    • Semantic knowledge is organised into categories (domains) that reflect evolutionary salient distinctions (relevant for our survival)

categories include

  1. Animals category
  2. fruits/vegetables category
  3. Conspecifics category (other humans)
  4. possibly tools category

Limitation: does not say how items are represented within a category

19
Q

What are the predictions of the Domain-Specific Hypothesis?

A

Prediction 1: Assumes distinct neural systems dedicated to animals, fruits/vegetables, conspecifics (humans) and tools, due to these distinct systems the other systems cannot compensate for the damaged neural system.

Prediction 2: No association between a deficit for a type or modality of knowledge and a conceptual deficit for a specific category

  • For any given category specific impairment this will be for all types of knowledge within the category
  • Patients with category-specific semantic deficits present with equivalent impairments to visual/ perceptual and functional/ associative knowledge

Prediction 3: Perceptual stages of object recognition models might be functionally organised by domain specific constraints and this predicts category specific visual agnosia despite intact early visual processes

  • The structural description stage of object representations might have those functional domains (such as functional/associative information and visual/perceptual information), but these domains do not apply to the semantic system (conceptual information is not represented this way)
20
Q

What are the limitations of the Domain-Specific Hypothesis?

A

Problems with Domain-Specific Hypothesis

  • Lack specificity how knowledge is represented within categories
  • Selective deficits → categorical organisation but approach does not explain how things are represented within each category
    • Plants – food or poison
    • Animals – attack or food
    • Tools – function, developed later
      • It is not clear how these categories are represented
21
Q

What is the Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis?

A

Theory of Semantic memory

(OUCH)

We have categories within our semantic system, categories comprise of highly correlated concepts because of overlapping/common features

  • Example
    • Humans and other animals would all cluster together in the animal category because they breathe, composed of flesh,

Assumption 1: How concepts are represented within semantic memory

  • Members of a semantic category cluster close together in feature space
  • Within a category representation occurs within semantic space and is lumpy
    • Items with a higher number of features are more central - have features in common with typical items (picture)

Assumption 2: Category specific patient deficits due to damage to lumpy region(s) within semantic spaceBrain damage affects category members because it

  • Affects objects/concepts with similar properties and these are stored in adjacent neural areas OR
  • Affects the highly correlated features of category members
22
Q

What is the benefits of the Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis (OUCH)?

A

Benefits of the Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis (OUCH)

  • Can account for very severe deficits
    • e.g., problem with animal category is a problem with the lumpy semantic space representation for animals and associated features
23
Q

What are the predictions of the Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis (OUCH)?

A

Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis (OUCH) predictions

Prediction 1: OUCH predicts modality specific semantic effects

  • Category impairments would occur due to disruption of feature representations of items within the impaired category, and not others

Prediction 2: OUCH predicts relative sparing of categorisation performance

  • While you might have damage to features within a category, you will have some level of category representation

Prediction 3: OUCH predicts category specific deficits

  • Category impairments would occur due to disruption of feature representations of items within the impaired category
    • You might have a specific deficit for plants, gem stones or furniture. The reason is the brain damaged caused disruption to the features that are most relevant to that category
24
Q

What are the strengths and limitations of the Organised Unitary Content Hypothesis (OUCH)?

A

Strengths

  • OUCH is consistent with patient data showing category specific deficits

Limitations

  • But the type of featural representation not defined
    • Animals for example; is it represented through pets, farm animals, sound characteristics
  • Ways information clusters together not specified
    • How do the items categories together
  • Functional rather than neural approach
    • May not be linked with neural deficits
25
Q

What is the Conceptual-Structure Account?

A

The Conceptual-Structure Account looks at the relationship between features of concepts which links them together into categories

  • Which explains category specific deficits due to damage to conceptual system

Similar to the OUCH model but it focuses on the relationship between features and how these items might be linked together in categories

  • Bird: large, beak, wings, eats fish, flies etc.
26
Q

What are the assumptions of the Conceptual-Structure Account?

A

Assumption 1: Living things have more shared features than non-living things. In other words, non-living things have more distinct/ informative features than living things (less things in common)

  • Furniture and tools - not many shared features
  • Animals and fruits - more shared features (life)

Assumption 2: Living things – biological information is highly correlated with shared perceptual properties (can see – has eyes) AND for artefacts function information is highly correlated with distinctive perceptual properties (used for spearing – has tines)

Assumption 3: Features that are highly correlated with other features will be more resistant to damage than features that are not highly correlated

  • OR if you disrupt a sing feature you could potentially disrupt access to all highly correlated features
27
Q

What are the predictions of the Conceptual-Structure Account?

A

There are two opposing sets of predictions

Prediction 1A:

  • Mild brain damage → deficit for living thing
    • Living things will show impairment at any level of damage, since individual features of animals are more unique and therefore more likely to be damaged
      • Mild brain damage - disproportionality effects recognition of living things as they have common features
  • Severe brain damage → deficit for non-living things
    • Artefact impairment only occurs with severe damage as the distinction between form and function is strongly correlated and therefore robust to brain damage
      • non-living things are less similar to each other - thus its severe brain damage that causes the effect

Prediction 1B:

  • Mild brain damage → impairment for non-living things because mild damage impairs the distinctive features - artefacts have many distinct features
    • It doesn’t take a lot to cause a problem here for the representation of non-living things
  • Severe brain damage → impairment for living things as severe damage would negate shared features
28
Q

What are the limitations of the Conceptual-Structure Account?

A

Problems with Conceptual-Structure Account

  • Theories ok with broad category deficits (living vs non-living) but have problems accounting for fine-grained deficits
  • Alternative views about degree of brain damage and impairments to living vs. non-living things, views are in opposition
29
Q

What are two possible Neuroanatomical Accounts of Semantic System?

A
  • The Anterior temporal cortex is the semantic store
  • The Anterior temporal cortex is the facilitator/combination area of conceptual representations that come from sensory and motor regions of the brain

Cognitive NeuroPsych (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions