Semantic Activation Without Conscious Identification Flashcards
INTRO
- Consciousness
- SAWCI
Consciousness
Attentional selection is reflected by consciousness of attended stimuli
Semantic activation without conscious identification
Different experimental paradigms have tried to investigate existence of SAWCI
MAIN BODY
- Dichotic Listening Tasks
- Evaluation
- Parafoveal vision experiments
- Evaluation
- Visual masking experimenting
- Evaluation
Dichotic Listening Tasks: Corteen & Dunn (1973)
Pp showed GSR when words conditioned with electric shocks or associated words were presented in unattended channel
Suggests unattended channel’s words are processed at semantic level
Suggests there’s semantic generalisation
Suggests the selective process in attention comes after meaning of words has been accessed
DLT Evaluation
- Wardlaw & Kroll (1976)- replicated experiment but unable to find same effect- suggests Corteen & Dunn (1973) pp may have sometimes been aware of unattended messages
- Unless we can be absolutely certain pp never become aware of unattended channel, DLT cannot provide sufficiently well-controlled experiments on which to base arguments about unconscious processing
Parafoveal vision experiments
1 stimulus plan presented in centre of visual field, another in parafovea
Underwood (1976)
Semantic info in unattended stimuli was processed outside conscious awareness
Lambert (1988)
If an abrupt distractor semantically related to target appears for 30ms in the periphery, response to target slower
PVE Evaluation
Both DLT & PVE cannot guarantee that pp is not voluntarily focusing attention
Visual masking experiments
Pp shown word followed by mask
Allport (1977)
Pp couldn’t consciously remember previously shown word but recalled words semantically related to it
Suggests that semantic activation happens before conscious identification of stimulus
Marcel (1980)
Evidence of facilitation when primes masked by pattern mask
But when mask was random noise there was no priming
Evidence for 2 different kinds of masking
Noise mask- degrades the stimulus input early in processing, no priming
Pattern mask- doesn’t prevent the automatic & unconscious access to stored semantic info but prevents perceptual integration & hence access to consciousness
Marcel (1983)
Regardless of mask condition, faster responses on congruent trials & slower responses on incongruent trials (stroop effect)
Suggests that unconscious semantic processing happens even if pp cannot consciously report it
VME Evaluation
Marcel (1983)- used 60% detection threshold which is higher than chance threshold of 50%