self report: interviews Flashcards
structured and unstructured interviews
what is an interview
type of spoken questionnaire where the interviewer recorder the responses
→ interviews can be structured with a predetermined set of questions or unstructured where no questions are decided in advance
unstructured (informal) interview
→ interviews that are like casual conversions
→ there are no set up questions and the pp is given the opportunity to raise whatever topics they feel are relevant and ask int their own way
pros of unstructured interviews
→ high in ecological validity → pps have the complete freedom to repond in any way they choose and the interview is tailored towards them as an individual
→ thoughts, feeling, fears, hopes and emotions can all be openly expressed by the pp with no manipulation from the researcher
→ the researcher has the flexibility to pursue any interesting topics that emerge during the interview and can be discussed from several different perspectives → gives rich and detailed qualitative data especially if the client feels the interviewer is sympathetic and understanding to what their problem is
cons of unstructured interviews
→ the responses cannot be compared fully as different may be asked
→ this means the qualitative data produced is not easy to analyse and compared, and standardised questions means that reliability cannot be assessed fully
→ researcher may lose their objectivity due to the imitate nature of unstructured interviews particularly if more than one interview sessions is required → they begin to feel too close to the pp and may begin to identify with them
structured (formal) interviews
→interviews that are more like job interviews
→ there is a fixed, predetermined set of questions that are put to every pp in the same order and in the same way
→ the interviewer stays within their role and maintains social distance from the interviewee
pros of structured interviews
→ the use of standardised questions means that the interview can be replicated and used by different researchers → this minimises the researcher effect as all researchers have to ‘stick to the script’ as it were rather than pursuing responses they find interesting
→ structured interviews may generate more quantitive data than unstructured interviews → which means the results can be statistically analysed and in turn increases the reliability of the findings
cons of structured interviews
→ a predetermined set of questions may be restrictive
→ the pps may say something which should be explored further but the format of the structured interview does not allow this