Self, Death And Afterlife Flashcards

1
Q

Bertrand Russell and life after deatg

A
  • it is not rational but emotion to believe in life after death
  • we do not have a purpose so no created afterlife/end
  • no permanence concerning ourselves, so our lives would not continue after death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is dualism

A

We have a body and soul, but the soul can be independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is materialism

A

The soul and body are one entity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is monism

A

Body and soul always have to be together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Different perspectives on soul

A
  • Buddhism: no soul as there is no permanent fixed self (Anatta) -Nagasena
  • Hindu and Sikh - soul is divine, point to reunite with God
  • Descartes, cogito ergo sum - self awareness shows there is a self
  • reincarnation ans the soul - IMAGO DEI, made in the image of God in Christianity; eternal in comparison to the body
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Belief in life after death and the soul

A
  • belief in whether there is a soul determines what you think will happen when u die (eg dualists think that soul outlives dead body)
  • problem of continued identity: if there is life after death, is it still me who experiences that?
  • medically dead = no brain activity, is this physical deahf
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

arguments for ‘we are just physical beings’

A
  • scientific reasons eg anatomy, no soul has been found in human body
  • nothing to show existence of soul
  • link to mind and brain –> brain damage affects personality
  • brain affecting drugs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

arguments against ‘we are just physical beings’

A
  • self awareness, conscience
  • god within humans, non physical (divine jot, holy spirit etc)
  • immaterial thoughts, memories etc
  • reductionist to say we are physical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is materialism

A

Minds are inseparable from the body
- there is no place where the soul exists separately
- body ceases to exist at death and so does person identity
- materialists have a scientific approach to life - emotion is a psycho chemical reaction
- no distinction between body and soul

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are hard materialists

A
  • do not accept that an individuals characteristics are anything more than physical ones
  • consciousness is brain activity
  • body and mind re one - no separation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are soft materialists

A

Not all characteristics are physical
- consciousness is more than a brain process
- M and B are both interdependent
- source is physical but output can be non material processes and can affect physical world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Similarities between hard and soft materialists

A
  • brain and mind are not independent
  • body dies, brain dies
  • soft materialism - personal identity cannot exist without body
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Differences between hard and soft materialists

A

HM believes consciousness is nothing more than brain activity and individual characteristics are only physical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Differences between hard and soft materialists

A

HM believes consciousness is nothing more than brain activity and individual characteristics are only physical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why do materialists not believe in life after death or the soul

A
  • brain = body, so if body dies brain dies, PHYSICAL
  • materialists reject the soul as there is no non material substance, and the origin of self awareness etc is physical as it comes from the brain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

two types of monism

A
  • materialism: nothing exists except for material world
  • agree that consciousness is function of the brain
  • mental processes are identified with purely physical processes in the central nervous system
  • phenomenalism: physical objects and events are reducible to mental objects, properties and events
  • only mental objects like the mind exist
  • Bishop Berkeley: what we think of a our body is a perception of the mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Gilbert Ryle and conceptual versus actual experience (why is it a category mistake to view the mind as separate from the body)

A
  • speaking of the soul is a mistake in language - soul is a concept
  • ‘no ghost in the machine’
  • cannot point to separate consciousness anymore can we point to team spirit
  • it is a mental process, non Phys concept
  • like left right and a pair of gloves (right and left hand IS the pair); body and soul does not exist
  • soul is contained within the physical body, not separate
  • its existence is rooted in the B, it is not an extra thing within a person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does Ryles view align with Buddhism

A
  • links with ANATTA - no permanent fixed unchanging self = no ghost in the machine

HOWEVER
- Rule focuses on identity as the BODY one of the 5 skandas
- - Buddha says identity is actions and consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Science and the soul - Dawkins

A
  • evolution of our morality - Consciousness, art, music etc is due to genetic evolution over animals –> shows evolutionary progress
  • pass on theses genes - pass on this consciousness +human dignity
  • survival of the fittest, natural selections, these genes for morality are passed on to our ancestors and we have mistaken them for a separate entity
  • those concepts have origin in the material world - people put too much value on them but they are from the mind
  • puts value on human life due to small chance of life - dogma/ doctrine limits our ability to to be better people and scientists
20
Q

Ryle and Dawkins are right

A
  • atheist - supports human emotion/culture without God
  • agrees with Buddha and ANATTA
  • agrees with human need to improve human life as it is our evolutionary predisposition
  • damage to our physical body affects our emotional personality eg brain damage
  • empirical data from science supports
  • Ryle, ontology of different aspects
21
Q

Ryle and Dawkins are wrong

A
  • reductionist as life is complex
  • falls apart if you do not believe in evolution
  • those who believe in divine creator believe that he has the power to mold immaterial and material together
  • if being good is evolutionary beneficial, morality may be seen as self serving
22
Q

what is dualism

A
  • there is a separate mind and body but are connected
  • there are distinct physical and mental substances
23
Q

why do dualists believe in this theory

A
  • evidence for physical and mental world eg emotion and conscience
  • rich complicated mental life
  • difference between mind and body substance
24
Q

plato and the soul

A
  • believes in green PSYCHE, soul separate from the body
  • soul is different to the body
  • ‘I’ does not mean the body, as it comes from the mind/soul
  • paradigm shift –> new way of thinking
25
Q

plato and tripartite soul

A
  • soul is made of 3 parts
  • rational: concerned with truth and logical thinking
  • spirited part is concerned with passions like anger
  • appetite: bodily desire
  • believes reason is the strongest element of this
  • your essence is your soul and the whole goal is to return to the world of forms
  • eg like escaping rebirth to be with God with Mukti, or going to heaven
26
Q

the realm of forms and plato

A
  • what we see are imperfect copies of perfect forms of concepts
  • for philosophers, reason is the part of the soul that can perceive the world of forms
  • we do not see this perfect truth due to ignorance
  • philosophers are the only people that can see the world of forms
27
Q

plato and the chariot analogy

A
  • white horse: spirit action and cooperation
  • black horse: desire and a rebel
  • reason =: the soul tries to stop these horses going in different directions to reach the world of forms
28
Q

the great circuit and plato

A
  • soul is great chariot race around forms –> if you fail race (overcome by black horse), soul drops in body
  • becoming a philosopher king is the best vs becoming a tyrant
  • enlightenment of the world of forms is REMEMBERING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
  • soul is the only way to know WOF as it is from that world and pre-exists the body
  • at death, soul separates from body and returns to world of forms
  • dependent on knowledge, soul goes into world of forms or rejoins chariot race
29
Q

how does Plato’s dualist theory align with Buddhism

A
  • buddha can see world of forms/nirvana through ultimate knowledge like philosophers
  • chariot race is like reincarnation
  • remember prior knowledge of WOF is like tathagatagarbha
30
Q

aristotle on the body and soul

A
  • soul is structure of the body –> function and organisation
  • reason: highest form of rationality (nous)
  • soul is a form of the body –> sum total of the operations of a human being
  • eg axe is just metal and wood without its purpose of cutting things
  • importance is telos of something
  • body and soul are not separate but one thing, different aspects
  • does not believe in immortality of the soul –> cannot exist without the body
  • this may not apply to reason
31
Q

similarities between aristotles and platos ideas on the soul and body

A
  • body is finite
  • most important part of the soul is reaosn
32
Q

differences between aristotles and platos ideas on the soul and body

A
  • plato: soul will endure and reach realm of forms
  • opens possibility for life after death and reincarnation
  • aristotle: soul is not immortal and dies when body dies
33
Q

descartes and substance of body and soul

A
  • substance dualist
  • extended substance: takes up space and has a form
  • thinking does not have a substance but happens in the mind –> MIND IS DIFFERENT FROM MATTER (matter that makes up the body)
  • mind can operate without body but body needs mind
  • religion compatible –> mind = soul (due to religious pressures)
34
Q

what makes mind and body different descartes

A
  • mind and soul are completely different substances
  • can imagine that your body is not real, but not your mind as you are still thinking
  • therefore body is not the same as the mind –> mind is too different
  • mind is more real that body
35
Q

mind and body connection with descartes

A
  • brain: connection between mind and body –> but brain is not the mind
  • mind is whole and indivisible, but body is parts and can be changed/cut up
  • animals do not have minds/souls –> but aligns with Catholicism at the time (man is the only dualistic creature)
  • interactionism: m and b are two different substances but interact in the pineal gland (now proven false)
  • said it was the ‘principle seat of the soul’
  • mind influences matter –> thinking of doing an action makes you do it
36
Q

what are Descartes 3 arguments

A
  1. argument from doubt
  2. arguments from divisibility and indivisibility
  3. argument from clear and distinct perception
37
Q

descartes argument from doubt

A
  • you can imagine your body not existing but not your mind, as you continue to think
  • mind is therefore on a higher level than body –> separate levels of substance/importance
  • therefore they are different
38
Q

strengths and weaknesses of descartes’ argument from D

A
  • anyone can do the thought experiment –> intuitively reasonable
  • consistent with religion
  • aligns with views on personhood

BUT
- from a materialist perspective: origin of thinking comes from brain –> a material part of body (not separate)
- argument does not prove that anyone else has a mind
- gilbert ryle: ghost in the machine –> concept of thinking thing does not mean it is a reality

39
Q

descartes argument for divisibility and indivisibility

A
  • brain and mind are two distinct substances
  • essential property of physical things is extension –> anything that can be extended can be divided
  • mind is not extendable and therefore indivisible
  • using LEIBNIZ’S LAW, if they are the same, they would have the same properties
40
Q

for and against from argument from divisibility and indivisibility

A

FOR
- descartes –> mind= consciousnesses
- emotions/perceptions/feelings are not different parts, but different modes

AGAINST
- mind can be divided into memory perception, emotion etc
- actual divisions of the mind are possible due to 2 hemispheres of the brain (empirical scientific evidence)

41
Q

descartes arguments from clear and distinct perception

A
  • I have a clear idea of myself as a thinking non-extended thing –> I do not take up time and space
  • body is a non thinking extended thing –> M and B are seperate
  • because they are not identical they are separate
  • contrast with triangle and 3 sides, cannot separate this
42
Q

strengths and weaknesses of clear and distinct perception

A

FOR
- triangle analogy is easy to understand

AGAINST
- masked man: can believe him to not be your father but he is
- can accidently conceive impossible

43
Q

how does DESCARTES see the body soul relationship

A
  • a problem of interaction of material and immaterial
  • INTERACTIONISM: mind and body can causally influence eachother –> mental and physical
  • no evidence for his version of where they connect –> pineal gland but proved to be associated with melatonin and sleep
  • CAUSAL INTERACTIONISM
44
Q

how does MATERIALISM see the body soul relationship

A
  • no D and S relationship as there is no S
  • ideas on immortal soul is wishful thinking
  • functionalism: how mind functions, as mind is established as purely matter
  • same substance –> brain = computer
45
Q

how does MONISM see the body soul relationship

A
  • we are one substance with 2 aspects to eachother
  • joined together –> close to aristotles view
  • a person is one thing –> body = physical and mind non physical
  • relationship between one substance
46
Q

Problem with Descartes INTERACTIONISM

A
  • does not show how it takes place
  • modern anatomy shows pineal gland is linked to melatonin and sleep production
  • working with 17th century mechanist view of universe - science is primitive