selective attention and awareness Flashcards
damage to V1 causes loss of visual awareness
cortical blindness: retinal inputs intact (lateralisation occurs after optic chasim)
- Lesion to V1 in humans: stroke in the posterior cerbral artery
blindsight-
- visual orienting in the absence of awareness
occurs following unilateral damage resticted to the PVC
Patient may show persevation of :- Pupillary reflexes
- Manual and saccadic localisation
- Wavelength (colour) and motion discrimination
- Orientation and shape discrimination
using perimetry to identify where vision is based on blindsight
- Patient db= right occipital lesion optic disc= chance elsewhere in blind region= above chanve.
how does visual information support unconscious perception in blindsight
- Evolutionary older pathways: superior colliculus, pulniver nucleus
- The only visual pathway for some animals, supports basic visuallyu guided response
how much of the real world are we aware of
- Evidence of blindness shows we can process visual info without consciouss awareness.
- It also provides a good reason to ask how much of the activity in visual cortex is associagted with coscious experience.
- Perceptual demonstrations show that attention limits our awareness.
why are we aware of only a small part of the visual world- why is awareness limited
- Neural limitations: bottleneck of the optic nerve
- Metabolic limitations: neural activity consumes a lot of energy and requires a lot of blood oxygenation
- Computational efficiency: assign the most neural machinery to processing important objects
Computational complexity: awareness integrates experience
the concept of attention
- William James: idea that there is withdrawal from one thing in order to deal effectively eith others, the cost of dealing with something is that we have less processing of the other things which are happening.
single brain process that corresponds to attention
- selectivity (spatial, temporal, motoric), capacity limitation, vigilance, perceptual set (sustained attention), switching
covert selective attention
- reveals prioritizing by the brain
Hermann studied effects of covert allocation of attention on visual perception; one can concentrate on the sensation from a particular part of out peripheral nervous system and at the same time exclude attention from all other parts. - car accident
spatial attention alters neural processing speed
task, theres an arrow that points to the right and the left
- We are much faster when we have a target then a que pointing away from the target.
- Slower response for invalid trials
- Enhanced processing in attended locations and less processing in places we are not attending to.,
neurons in parietal cortex are modulated by attention
- Change in repsonse to neuron if we flash the stimuls. If stimulus appears in visual field,
- To get the task right, they need to focus their attention on a specific point
- Used monkeys, much bigger response from the neuron,
attention increases spatial selectivity in V2 and V4 neurons
- Monkeys were trained to attend to one of two locations In the receptive field 1, 2 or 4
- Effective and ineffective stimuli were shown at both locations
- Stimuli were shown sequentially (one object in the RF) or simultanedously (two objects in the cells RF\
- Looked for evidence of spatial selectivity in the simultaneous condition.
- Attention to stimulus increases cells response
the difference is greatest when there are 2 stimuli in the receptive field, and they have one to focus on. Attention boosts response to asingle object.
attention enhances responses relative to competing objects inRF
- attention to a stimulus increases a cell’s response regardless of condition
- effect of attention is greatest for two stimuli in RF
- attention helps bias response to attended stimulus in RF
attention modulates early and mid-level visual processing in humans
- Watanabe
- fMRI 1.5 t
- Randomly arranged moving dots
- Translation component: v1 and MSt sensitive
- Expansion component: MST sensitive
- V1 not sensitive.
Effects of attention on early and mid level visual processing
- Passively viewing moving dots with expansion and translation does not alter the fMRI signal
- Attending to the expanding component increrases the fmri signal in MT/ MSt
- Attending to the translation component increases the fmri signal in both v1 and MT/MST where neurons are responsive to translation