Selecting, Administering, Scoring, and Interpreting Assessment Results 4 Flashcards
Scoring Assessment Instruments Interpreting Assessment Results Summary
What are the Scoring Assessment instruments?
hand-scored, computer-scored, sent to the publisher for scoring, or self-scored by the client.
What is Hand-scoring?
o the use of scoring keys or templates to aid in the scoring process
o Instructions and conversion charts for transforming raw scores into standard scores.
T or F:
Hand-scoring is efficient and cost-effective
False
Hand-scoring is neither efficient nor cost-effective given the time it takes to score the instrument, the need for qualified scorers, and the propensity for errors.
Some hand-scored instruments demand that the scorer judge the degree of…….
How does that happen? With example
the degree of correctness of the response or compare the responses to standards provided.
How?
essay questions on many college placement examinations are scored using a holistic scoring procedure.
The raters have model answers that have been given certain weights, and they compare the examinee’s essays to these.
Such raters are asked to assess answers on a 4-point scale and make an overall rating, or holistic judgment, rather than assign a certain number of points to each possible component of the answer.
What Computer-scoring involve?
inputting test results or scanning an answer sheet into a software program, which then automatically generates test results.
Computer scoring is easier. T or F?
True
Computer scoring is typically easier to perform, less time consuming, requires scorers with less training, and produces fewer scoring errors.
What the administrator have to have to use Computer scoring?
have to understand the process of scoring and the information related to standard scores in order to develop competency in the interpretation of computer-scored assessment instruments.
How to Interpret Assessment Results
- determine whether the score reflects norm-referenced or criterion-referenced interpretation.
- Another approach to interpreting assessment instruments is based on the interindividual (normative) and intra-individual (ipsative) models.
- Explain the meaning of various standard scores and their implications to the test taker (client).
- Understand factors that can affect assessment interpretation:
- Computer-generated reports or narratives:
What is norm-referenced and criterion-referenced interpretation? give example
o Norm-referenced score interpretation involves comparing an individual’s test score to the scores of other people (i.e., a norm group) who have taken the same instrument.
o Using criterion-referenced score interpretation, an individual’s score is measured against a specified standard or criterion. With a criterion-referenced instrument, the focus is not on how the individual’s performance compares with others, but rather on how the individual performs with respect to a particular standard of performance.
o E.g., Driving Tests are criterion-referenced tests, because their goal is to see whether the test taker is skilled enough to be granted a driver’s license, not to see whether one test taker is more skilled than another test taker.
Compare between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests?
This card for Criterion Referenced Test
- Test what students can actually do.
- It is possible for all students to get As if they are all able to meet the criteria.
- Motivates student to perform “up-to-standard- rather than trying to be better than other students.
- Allow users to interpret what an individual can do without considering the performance of others.
- Design to measure the results of instruction.
- Emphasizes description of performance
Compare between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests?
This card for Norm References Test
- Relates one candidate’s performance to that of other candidates.
- Places student in a percentage category.
- Seeks a bell-shaped curve in student assessment.
- Percentile Rank is obtained to determine the relative standing in a norm group.
- Emphasize discrimination among individuals
Compare between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests when it comes to interpretation?
This card for Criterion Referenced Test interpretation
- Each individual is compared with a preset standard for acceptable achievement. The performance of other examinees is irrelevant.
- A student’s score is usualy expressed as percentage.
- Student achievement is reported for individual skits.
- Assessment against fixed standards or criterion
- Example: Driving test LET Citizenship Test Classroom Assessment Competency Based Assessment
Compare between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests when it comes to interpretation?
This card for Norm References Test interpretation
- Each individual is compared with other examinees.
- A score…usually expressed as percentile, a grade equivalent score, or a stanine.
- Student achievement is reported for broad skill areas, although some norm referenced tests do report student achievement for individual
- Competitive, compares individuals with each other and ranks them
- Example: Olympics
What is inter-individual (normative) model?
- Examine differences on the same construct across test takers.
- We look at score variations among the different individuals who took the test.
What intra-individual (ipsative) models?
- Using an intra-individual approach, we compare a test taker’s scores on various scales within the same test.
- We are looking for score discrepancies within the individual.
- an instrument provides a profile of an examinee’s scores on various scales and subtests.