Seizures and Arrests Flashcards
Constitutional protections apply only to ________ action.
government
True or False: Individuals cannot violate the 4th, 5th, or 6th Amendment (unless they are an agent of the government).
True!
What are two exceptions to the rule that constitutional protections of the 4th-6th Amendments only apply to government action?
(1) Private persons acting as government agents
(2) Defense counsel with respect to effective assistance of counsel
Police can approach anyone in public without any constraint unless and until that turns into a _______.
Seizure
True or False:
Police have no real constraint on what they do or discover while in public unless their conduct amounts to a seizure.
True!
What is a seizure?
When an officer uses physical force or a show of authority to intentionally terminate or restrain someone’s freedom of movement.
What are some examples of physical force that qualifies for a seizure?
Tackling someone, punching someone, hitting someone with your car with the intent to stop them.
A police officer in a high-speed chase with a suspect hits a bystander. Have the police engaged in an unlawful seizure of the bystander?
No! Must apply intentional force to restrain/terminate freedom of movement.
How do we determine whether an officer conducts a seizure?
When a reasonable person does not feel free to disregatd the officer’s order.
What is a stop and frisk?
A stop and frisk - also called a Terry Stop - is where an officer stops an individual about whom he has a reasonable suspicion based on an articulable fact that the suspect is about to (or already is) engaged in criminality.
An officer only needs ____ to perform a stop and frisk (Terry Stop)?
What’s the criminal standard?
reasonable suspicion
True/False:
An officer’s reasonable suspicion can be based on a mistake of law or fact as long as the suspicion was reasonable.
True!
What three things can an officer do/not do during a stop and frisk?
(1) Pat down the suspect for weapons (for their own safety)
(2) Cannot frisk for evidence
(3) Can seize obviously shaped contraband
Thinking of the consequences of a stop and frisk, what happens if an officer’s suspicion is confirmed during the stop and frisk?
During a stop and frisk, an officer’s suspicions can be confirmed and develop into probable cause for an arrest.
An officer’s initial reasonable suspicion can be ____ during a stop and frisk based on either what the officer ____ or the suspect ______.
confirmed
finds
says
For a Terry Stop, what is the result if an officer’s initial stop was unlawful but evidence was found?
If the initial stop was unlawful but the basis for a lawful arrest develops during the stop and frisk, the evidence may be used at trial.
Will evidence be excluded if the initial stop is unlawful and no basis develops for lawful arrest?
Yes! The officer cannot use anything seized if there was no basis for the Terry stop and none develops for lawful arrest.
What does an officer need to conduct a traffic stop of a car?
To stop a car, an officer must have reasonable suspicion to believe the driver is engaged in some violation of the law.
When an officer conducts a traffic stop (following their reasonable suspicion), what are they allowed to do/search for?
May pat down the occupant for weapons if they have a reasonable suspicion the occupant is armed.
True/False: Officers need reasonable suspicion to stop cars at a checkpoint.
False - as long as no discretion is being used, officers can stop anybody without reasonble suspicion at a designated checkpoint.
What is the 4th Amendment?
Right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonble searches and seizures.
True/False: Fourth Amendment rights are personal and cannot be asserted on someone else’s behalf.
True - no vicarious assertion.
Al and Bob are accused of burglarizing an electronics store. Police find stolen DVD players in Al’s apartment after an illegal warrantless search. Who can raise a Fourth Amendment claim?
Only Al has standing to raise the issue of a Fourth Amendment violation. Bob’s rights not violated.
When an officer does not show an unambiguous intent to restrain an individual freedom of movement, a seizure occurs only if ___________________.
a reasonable innocent person would believe he was not free to leave, decline officer’s request, or terminate encounter.
A police officer must intentionally employ ________ or ________ for the officer’s actions to result in a seizure.
physical force
show of authority
During a high speed car chase, an officer forces a driver of the pursused vehicle off the road by bumping into his car. Is this a seizure?
Yes! Officer’s use of intentional force constitutes a seizure.
During a high-speed chase, an officer accidentally hits and kills the passenger of the motorcycle being pursued when the motorcycle tips over. Is this a seizure?
No! The officer’s accidental use of deadly force against the passenger did not constitute a seizure.
Only the driver of a car pulled over unlawfully by the police can claim the right against unreasonable seizure was violated. True or False?
False - passengers as well may challenge the constitutionality of the stop because they also are seized.
What is the definition of a ‘stop’? Are stops also seizures?
A temporary detention for the purpose of a criminal investigation. Yes, a stop is a seizure for the Fourth Amendment.
What standard must the officer have before making an arrest?
Arrest requires probable cause to believe the arrested individual committed a crime.
True/False:
The standard for arrest is the same as that for stop and frisk.
False!
Arrest = probable cause
Stop and frisk = reasonable suspicion + articulable fact
Arrest based on probable cause is a ________ (objective/subjective) standard.
Objective
It’s whether a reasonable officer had probable cause.
What are the two types of arrest?
Arrests with a warrant and those without a warrant
What is a pre-text arrest? Are they allowed?
A pretextual arrest/stop are stops initiated by law enforcement for a minor traffic violation, with the actual purpose of investigating or searching for evidence of another, unrelated crime.
Allows the police to pull someone over for a minor violation of law (such as not using your turn signal) but then using that traffic stop to investigate more serious crimes.
Pretext arrests are allowed under the 4th Amendment. An officer can pull someone over if they believe some crime has been committed - allowed to use that as the pretext.
What is the backstop to a potentially unlimited use of pretextual arrests and stops?
Equal Protection