SECTIONS 17/18/19 - When Property Passes Flashcards
When does risk pass?
With property, even if delivery hasn’t been made to buyer
Which section denotes that risk passes with property?
s 20(1) UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED
What happens if delivery of goods is delayed due to fault of one party?
That party bears the risk, provided loss would not have occured except due to their fault
Which section states that party at fault retains risk
s 20 (2)
What is the paramount principle of s17?
That property passes when the parties intend
Which part of s17 states property passes when parties intend?
s17 (1)
What is s17 (2)
Guidance on what courts will take into consideration as intention
Which case states courts will take into account implied as well as express intention?
RE ANCHOR LINE 1937
RE ANCHOR LINE 1937
(Crane); stipulation that the buyer was to have “entire charge of and responsibility” for a crane was taken to indicate that the buyer, who took possession of the goods, did so as a bailee and that property in the goods was still vested in the seller
What is the principle of s18?
No property is transferred to the buyer unless the goods are ascertained; prevails over the stated intention of the parties
What is s18?
The statutory presumptions of s17
How many rules are there in s18
5, but rule 5 is a selection of subrules
RULE 1 s18
Sale of specific goods, unconditional contracts
What does rule 1 mean?
Property will pass at the time of contract, even if delivery is delayed
What does unconditional mean in rule 1
the preferred view that a contract is unconditional where there is nothing that prevents property from passing
WHy has the idea of unconditional in rule 1 been the subject of debate?
Stoljar S.J. ‘Contractual Concept of Condition’ (1953)
note that contracts with a Retention of title/Romalpa clause are conditional contracts in that the passing of property is conditional on payment of the purchase price
What did Stoljar write in 1953, stating contracts with a Rompula clause are not unconditional, but depend on payment of purchase price?
Contractual Concept of Condition 1953
Cases for Rule 1
Kursell v Timber Operators
Joseph Reid pty ltd v Schultz
CASE FACTS
Kursell v Timber Operators
Timber, property not passed to the buyer pursuant to rule 1 as the timber was not specific goods. goods were identified after the contract was made
‘TIMBER’ not specific enough
CASE FACTS
Joseph Reid ltd v Schultz
contract for all the malleable timber on a plot of land. the timber was already cut and awaited collection; held to be specific goods as there was no identifying to be done after the contract was made
Difference between Joseph Reid ltd v Schultz and Kursell v Timber Operators
The specific nature, timber in Kursell was not a specific good, too general, whereas in Joseph Reid the exact timber was identified
Rule 2
sale of specific goods to be put into a deliverable state
Under rule 2 what has to happen?
Goods must be in a deliverable state and notice given to the buyer of this